A teachers’ orientation approach to understand the university teacher-student relationship

  1. Inés Küster-Boluda 1
  2. Natalia Vila-López 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revue:
ESE: Estudios sobre educación.

ISSN: 1578-7001

Année de publication: 2021

Número: 40

Pages: 149-172

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15581/004.40.149-172 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: ESE: Estudios sobre educación.

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

This research intends to advance the understanding of the university teacher-student relationship in the context of teachers’ market orientation with the aim to improve students’ performance. Thus, the study is articulated on three axes: the students’ performance approach, the relationship among diverse aspects of teachers, and, fi nally, the effect of these aspects on students’ performance. The results gained from a sample of 45 teachers and 932 students show that teachers’ student orientation infl uences perceived learning and student satisfaction. Other interesting results are also attained that lead to certain conclusions and implications.

Références bibliographiques

  • Ackerman, D. S. and Hu, J. (2011). Effect of type of curriculum on educational outcomes and motivation among marketing students with different learning styles. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(3), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0273475311420233
  • Aldás, J. and Uriel, E. (2006). Análisis multivariante aplicado: aplicaciones al marketing, investigación de mercados, economía, dirección de empresas y turismo. Madrid: Thomson.
  • Cabrera, B. and Báez de la Fe, B. F. (2003). Profesores por omisión: reforma, burocracia, lealtad y vocación en la docencia universitaria. La Laguna: Resma.
  • Caballero, C. (2006). Burnout, engagement y rendimiento académico entre estudiantes universitarios que trabajan y aquellos que no trabajan. Revista Psicogente, 9(6), 11-27.
  • Cañadas, I. and Cuétara, I. D. (2018). Estudio psicométrico y validación de un cuestionario para la evaluación del profesorado universitario de enseñanza a distancia. Revista de Estudios de Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 5(2), 102- 112. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2018.5.2.3701
  • Capelleras, J. L. and Veciana, J. M. (2004). Actitudes del personal hacia el trabajo y la organización. Una aplicación empírica en la Universidad. ESIC Market, 119, 47-74.
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Methodology for business and management. Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Costa, C., Cardoso, A. P., Lima, M. P., Ferreira, M. and Abrantes, J. L. (2015). Pedagogical Interaction and Learning Performance as Determinants of Academic Achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 874-881.
  • Danko, W. D. and Schaninger, C. M. (1988). Applying Marketing Techniques to Improve Students’ Perceptions of Marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 10(2), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/027347538801000207 de Vries, W. and Ibarra, E. (2004). La gestión de la universidad. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 9(22), 575-584.
  • Elliot, A. J., Shell, M. M., Henry, K. B. and Maier, M. A. (2005). Achievement goals, performance contingencies, and performance attainment. An experimental test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 430-440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.630
  • Elzinga, K. G. (2001). Fifteen theses on classroom teaching. Southern Economic Journal, 68, 249-257. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061593
  • Fenollar, P., Cuestas, P. J. and Román, S. (200W8). Antecedentes del rendimiento académico. aplicación a la docencia en marketing. Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing, 12(2), 7-24.
  • Flavián, C. and Lozano, F. J. (2003). Diseño de una escala para medir la orientación al entorno de la nueva formación profesional. Cuadernos de economía y dirección de la empresa, 15, 157-187.
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Models with Unobservables Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 39-50.
  • Gao, Z. and Xiang, P. (2007). Exploring the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationships Between Achievement Goals and Fitness Testing Scores Among Secondary Physical Education Students. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(1), A56-A57.
  • González-Romá, V. (2008). Modelos multinivel en la investigación psicosocial. In J. F. Morales Domínguez, C. Huici Casal, A. Gómez Jiménez y E. Gaviria (Coords.), Método, teoría e investigación en psicología social (pp. 69-84). Madrid: Pearson Educación.
  • González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. and Llorens, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.003
  • Greene, B. A. and Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0015 Gullason, E. T. (2009). A compilation and synthesis of effective teaching strategies in the economics discipline. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 15(2), 83-105.
  • Hair Jr, F., Sarstedt, J., Hopkins, M. and Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  • Harris, E. G., Mowen, J. C. and Brown, T. J. (2005). Re-examining salesperson goal orientations, personality influencers, customer orientation, and work satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304267927
  • Ibarra, E. (2005). Origen de la empresarialización de la universidad. El pasado de la gestión de los negocios en el presente del manejo de la universidad. Revista de la Educación Superior, 33(134), 2. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-27602005000200013&lng=es&nrm=i&tlng=es
  • Keith, K. (1998). The responsive university in the twenty century. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), The Responsive University: Restructuring for High Performance (pp. 48-61). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
  • Knight, P. (2007). Fostering and assessing ‘wicked’ competences. https://docplayer.net/99662287-Fostering-and-assessing-wicked-competences.html.
  • Lackritz, J. R. (2004). Exploring burnout among university faculty: Incidence, performance, and demographic issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 713- 729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.002
  • Leiter, M. P. and Maslach, C. (1999). Six areas of worklife: a model of the organizational context of burnout. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, (Spring), 472-489.
  • Loureiro, S. M. C. and Miranda, F. J. (2011). Brand equity and brand loyalty in the internet banking context: FIMIX-PLS market segmentation. Journal of Service Science and Management, 4(4), 476. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2011.44054.
  • Marks, H. and Seashores, K. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245-275. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1164465?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
  • Marks, R. B. (2000). Determinants of Student Evaluations of Global Measures of Instructor and Course Value. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 108-119.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Student evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
  • Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1991). Students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: the stability of mean ratings of the same teachers over a 13-year period. Teaching & Teacher Education, 7(4), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(91)90001-6
  • Maslach, C. (2003). Job burnout. New directions in research and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 189-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01258
  • Maslach, C. and Leiter, M. P. (2001). Teacher burnout. A research agenda. In R. Vandenberghe and A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout (pp. 295-303). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B. and Leiter, M. P. (2001). Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
  • Mateo, J. and Vlachopoulos, D. (2013). Evaluación en la universidad en el contexto de un nuevo paradigma para la educación superior. Educación XX1, 16(2), 183- 208. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.16.2.2639
  • Meece, J. L. and Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582-590. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.85.4.582
  • Midgley C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. H., Anderman, E. and Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0965
  • Moriana Elvira, J. A. and Herruzo Cabrera, J. (2004). Estrés y burnout en profesores. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 4(3), 597-621.
  • Murphy, P. K. and Alexander, P. A. (2000). A Motivated Exploration of Motivation Terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3-53. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nurmi, J. E., Onatsu, T. and Haavisto, T. (1995). Underachievers’ cognitive and behavioral strategiess-self-handicapping at school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1012
  • Olivares, O. J. (2001). Student interest, grading leniency, and teacher ratings. A conceptual analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 382-399. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1070
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543066004543
  • Pajares, F., Hartley, J. and Valiante, G. (2001). Response format in writing selfefficacy assessment. Greater discrimination increases prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33(4), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2001.12069012
  • Petruzzellis, L., D’Uggento, A. M. and Romanazzi, S. (2006). Students satisfaction and quality of service in Italian universities. Managing Service Quality, 16(4), 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520610675694
  • Phillips, J. M. and Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 792-802. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.82.5.792
  • Schaufeli, W. and Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with Burnout and Engagement. A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. and Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout. A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  • Scott, C. and Dinham, S. (2003). The development of scales to measure teacher and school executive occupational satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310457448
  • Seifert, T. L. and O’Keefe, B. A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158406
  • Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71-81. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.71
  • Sullivan, J. R., War, S. and Hsieh, P. (2007). A Closer Look at College Students. Self-Efficacy and Goal Orientation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(3), 454- 476. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-500
  • Summers, J. J., Davis, H. A. and Hoy, A. W. (2017). The effects of teachers’ efficacy beliefs on students’ perceptions of teacher relationship quality. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.004
  • Usher, E. L. and Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory effi- cacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002
  • Vila, N., Küster, I. and Pardo, E. (2012): Antecedentes y efectos del burnout-engagement del vendedor. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 15(3), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.02.001
  • Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Joreskog and H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation. Causality, structure and prediction. Part II (pp. 1-54). Netherlands. Amsterdam: North- Holland.