Predicción del bienestar hedónico y eudaimónico en envejecimiento con éxito

  1. José M. Tomás 1
  2. Laura Galiana 1
  3. Melchor Gutiérrez 1
  4. Patricia Sancho 2
  5. Amparo Oliver 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 Universidad Católica San Antonio
    info

    Universidad Católica San Antonio

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05b1rsv17

Aldizkaria:
EJIHPE: European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education

ISSN: 2174-8144,  2254-9625

Argitalpen urtea: 2016

Alea: 6

Zenbakia: 3

Orrialdeak: 167-176

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.30552/EJIHPE.V6I3.177 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: EJIHPE: European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education

Laburpena

Psychological well-being is a construct of maximum relevance in psychology, being the equivalent to health in medical sciences. It is a multifaceted construct, with two research traditions: the hedonic and the eudaimonic ones. On the other hand, the paradign of succesful aging is a good theoretical framework to study and understand optimal aging. Rowe and Kahn (1998) articulated this paradign proposing its three main characteristics:physcal health, cognitive functioning and being productive and socially active. The aim of this research is to develop a predictive model of well-being, both hedonic and eudaimonic, using the sucessful aging parading plus a dimension of spirituality. Mainresults of the model showed that social support had a significant and positive on satisfaction and to a lesser extent on well-being. Pshysical health was also a significant predictor of satisfaction. An finally, spirituality may also be considered a protector of well-being. Percentage of variance explained of life satisfaction was 23.3%, while this percentage on well-being was 10.4%.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

Esta publicación ha contado con la ayuda del proyecto de investigación PSI2014-53280R.

Finantzatzaile

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Citas Bellón, J.A., Delgado, A., Luna del Castillo, J.D., y Lardelli, P. (1996). Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de apoyo social funcional Duke-UNC-11. Atención Primaria, 18, 153-163.
  • Bentler, P.M. (2005). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software, Inc., California.
  • Berg, C.A., Smith, T.W., Henry, N.J.M., y Pearce, G.E. (2007). A developmental approach to psychosocial risk factors and successful aging. En C.M. Aldwin, C.L. Park y A. Spiro (Ed.), Handbook of Health Psychology and Aging. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Bishop, A.J., Martin, P., y Poon, L. (2006). Happiness and congruence in older adulthood: a structural model of life satisfaction. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 445-453.
  • Borg, C., Hallberg, I.R., y Blomqvist, K. (2006). Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 607-618.
  • Brown, S.L., Nesse, R.M., Vinokur, A.D., y Smith, D.M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320-327.
  • Chan, Y.K., y Lee, R.P.L. (2006). Network size, social support and happiness in later life: A comparative study of Beijing and Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 87-112.
  • Cheng, S. (2013). Defining successful aging: the need to distinguish pathways from outcomes. International Psychogeriatrics, 26, 527-531. doi:10.1017/S1041610213001713
  • Cosco, T.D., Prina, A.M., Perales, J., Stephan, B., y Brayne, C. (2013). Lay perspectives of successful ageing: a systematic review and meta ethnography. Bristish Medical Journal Open, 3, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-00271
  • Cowlishaw, S., Niele, S., Teshuva, K., Browning, C., y Kendig, H. (2013). Older adults’ spirituality and life satisfaction: a longitudinal test of social support and sense of coherence as mediating mechanisms. Ageing & Society, 33, 1243-1262.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., y Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
  • Finney, S., y Di Stefano, M. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in SEM. En G.R. Hancock y R.O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural Equation Modelling: A second course (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CO: Information Age Publishing.
  • Gow, A.J., Pattie, A., Whiteman, M.C., Whalley, L.J., y Deary, I.J. (2007). Social support and successful aging. Investigating the relationships between lifetime cognitive change and life satisfaction. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 103-115.
  • Gutiérrez, M., Tomás, J.M., Galiana, L., Sancho, P., y Cebrià, M.A. (2013). Predicting life satisfaction of the Angolan elderly: A structural model. Aging & Mental Health, 17, 94- 101.
  • Gwozdz, W., y Sousa-Poza, A. (2010). Ageing, health and life satisfaction of the oldest old: An analysis for Germany. Social Indicators Research, 97, 397-417.
  • Havighurst, R.J. (1961). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1, 8-13. doi:10.1093/geront/1.1.8
  • Hilton, J.M., Gonzalez, C.A., Saleh, M., Maitoza, R., y Anngela-Cole, L. (2012). Perceptions of successful aging among older Latinos in cross-cultural context. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 27, 183-199.
  • Hu, L., y Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Iwamasa, G.Y., y Iwasaki, M.A. (2011). A new multidimensional model of successful aging: perceptions of Japanese American older adults. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 26, 261-78. doi: 10.1007/s10823-011-9147-9.
  • Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. En D. Kahneman, E. Diener, y N. Schwarz (Eds.), WellBeing: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 3-25). New York: Russell Sage Found.
  • Keyes, C.L.M., Shmotkin, D., y Ryff, C. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022.
  • Kunzmann, U., Little, T.D., y Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin aging study. Psychology and Aging, 15, 511–526.
  • Lee, E., y Carey, T. (2013). Eudaimonic well-being as a core concept of positive functioning. MindPad, Winter 2013, 17-20.
  • Lubben, J., y Gironda, M. (2004). Measuring social networks and assessing their benefits. En C. Phillipson, G. Allan, y D. Morgan (Eds.), Social networks and social exclusion: Sociological and policy perspectives (pp. 20-35). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Ashgate.
  • Moody, H.R., y Sasser, J.R. (2012). Aging: Concepts and Controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Okabayashi, H., Liang, J., Krause, N., Akiyama, H., y Sugisawa, H. (2004). Mental health among older adults in Japan: Do sources of social support and negative interaction make a difference? Social Science and Medicine, 59, 2259–2270.
  • Pethtel, O., y Chen, Y. (2010). Cross-cultural aging in cognitive and affective components of subjective well-being. Psychology and Aging, 25, 725-729.
  • Rowe, J.W., y Kahn, R.L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Ryan, R.M., y Deci, E.L. (2001). To be happy or to be self-fulfilled: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
  • Ryff, C.D., y Singer, B.H. (2000). Interpersonal flourishing: A positive health agenda for the new millennium. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 30-44.
  • Ryff, C.D., y Singer, B.H. (2001). Emotion, social relationships, and health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Ryff, C., y Keyes, C.L.M., (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
  • Sánchez, M., González, C., Robles, R., y Andrade, P. (2012). Desarrollo y evaluación psicométrica de un índice de espiritualidad para adultos mayores en México. Psicología Iberoamericana, 20, 41-48.
  • Smith, J., Borchelt, M., Maier, H., y Jopp, D. (2002). Health and well-being in the young old and oldest old. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 715-732.
  • Theurer, K, y Wister, A. (2010) Altruistic behaviour and social capital as predictors of well-being among older Canadians. Ageing & Society, 30, 157–181. doi: 10.1017/s014 4686x09008848
  • Villar, F., Solé, C., Osuna, M.J., y Triadó, C. (2005). La medida del bienestar en personas mayores: adaptación de la Escala Ryff. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 58, 347-364.
  • Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J.E., y Gandek, B. (2001). How to Score and Interpret Single-Item Health Status Measures: A Manual for Users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
  • Waterman, A.S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678-691.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet