Teleworking Components and Scientific Productivity in Spanish ERC-Granted TeamsThe Mediating Role of Climate and Well-Being

  1. Guido Martinolli 3
  2. Alejandro Sanín Posada 4
  3. Simone Belli 1
  4. Inés Tomas 2
  5. Núria Tordera 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
  2. 2 Institut d´Investigació en Psicologia dels Recursos Humans, del Desenvolupament Organitzacional, i de la Qualitat de Vida Laboral (IDOCAL), Universitat de València, Spain
  3. 3 Institut d´Investigació en Psicologia dels Recursos Humans, del Desenvolupament Organitzacional, i de la Qualitat de Vida Laboral (IDOCAL), Universitat de València, Spain; 2Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain; 3Siete Gestión Humana y Organizacional S.A.S. – Mejores personas, mejores empresas
  4. 4 Siete Gestión Humana y Organizacional S.A.S. – Mejores personas, mejores empresas
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 39

Número: 3

Páginas: 131-143

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Resumen

La práctica del teletrabajo se está utilizando de manera consistente y sin precedentes en múltiples sectores laborales, también en el de la investigación. No obstante, todavía quedan cuestiones que dilucidar sobre la relación entre aspectos específicos del diseño del teletrabajo y la productividad, así como los posibles mecanismos mediadores entre ambos a distintos niveles de análisis (individual, equipo). El trabajo tiene como objetivo explorar el papel mediador del clima para el bienestar y sus consecuencias en la relación entre múltiples componentes del teletrabajo y la productividad científica, tanto a nivel individual como de equipo. Se han recogido datos de 358 miembros de 48 equipos españoles subvencionados por el Consejo Europeo de Investigación (ERC). Los análisis se han realizado a ambos niveles tras comprobar los índices de agregación pertinentes. Cuatro componentes del teletrabajo (intensidad, frecuencia, flexibilidad y voluntariedad) presentaban relaciones significativas, directas e indirectas, con la productividad científica, confirmando la necesidad de investigar cómo se diseña e implementa en los equipos el teletrabajo. Se ha visto que el clima para el bienestar, el bienestar eudaimónico y las emociones negativas mediaban la relación entre algunos componentes del teletrabajo (la flexibilidad y la voluntariedad del teletrabajo) y la productividad científica. Además, la intensidad y la frecuencia del teletrabajo tenían, respectivamente, una relación positiva y negativa con la productividad científica. Las implicaciones prácticas y teóricas se analizan con más detalle en el artículo.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baba, H., Ikegami, K., Ando, H., Eguchi, H., Tsuji, M., Tateishi, S., Nagata, M., Matsuda, S., & Fujino, Y. (2022). Telecommuting frequency and preference among Japanese workers according to regional cumulative COVID-19 incidence: A cross-sectional study. SAGE Open, 12(1), Article 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082134
  • Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144
  • Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. L., De Saá-Pérez, P., García-Carbonell, N., Martín-Alcázar, F., & Sánchez-Gardey, G. (2022). Exploring the determinants of scientific productivity: A proposed typology of researchers. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 195-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2019-0178
  • Banfield, P., Kay, R., & Royles, D. (2018). Introduction to human resource management. Oxford University Press.
  • Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912
  • Barsade, S. G., Brief, A. P., & Spataro, S. E. (2003). The affective revolution in organizational behavior: The emergence of a paradigm. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 3-52). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.24286163
  • Bartels, A. L., Peterson, S. J., & Reina, C. S. (2019). Understanding well-being at work: Development and validation of the Eudaimonic Workplace Well-Being Scale. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0215957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215957
  • Beckel, J. L. O., & Fisher, G. G. (2022). Telework and worker health and well-being: A review and recommendations for research and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), Article 3879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073879
  • Blau, P. (1968). Social exchange. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 452-457). Macmillan & Free Press.
  • Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814001
  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. K. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). Jossey-Bass.
  • Bliese, P. D. (2016a). Multilevel: Multilevel functions. R package version 2.6. https://cran.r-project.org/package=multilevel
  • Bliese, P. D. (2016b). Multilevel modeling in R (2.6). http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib//Bliese_Multilevel.pdf
  • Bommer, W. H., Johnson, J. L., Rich, G. A., Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01772.x
  • Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.12736076
  • Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2016). Reflections on the 2014 decade award: Is there strength in the construct of HR system strength? Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0323
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Brunetto, Y., Teo, S. T. T., Shacklock, K., & Farr-Wharton, R. (2012). Emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, well-being and engagement: Explaining organisational commitment and turnover intentions in policing. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00198.x
  • Burke, M. J., & Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A user’s guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002002
  • Burke, M. J., Finkelstein, L. M., & Dusig, M. S. (1999). On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819921004
  • Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote E-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  • Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2001). When a “happy” worker is really a “productive” worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(3), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.53.3.182
  • Davenport, T. H., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Beers, M. C. (1996). Improving knowledge work processes. Sloan Management Review, 37(4), 53-66.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335-362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
  • Espejo, B., Checa, I., Perales-Puchalt, J., & Lisón, J. F. (2020). Validation and measurement invariance of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in a Spanish general sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), Article 8359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228359
  • Eurofound. (2020). Living, working and covid-19. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2020/living-working-and-covid-19
  • Eurofound, & ILO. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work.
  • Fichman, M., & Cummings, J. N. (2003). Multiple imputation for missing data: Making the most of what you know. Organizational Research Methods, 6(3), 282-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103255532
  • Fleiss, J. L. (1999). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032923
  • Friedland, D. S., & Price, R. H. (2003). Underemployment: Consequences for the health and well-being of workers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1-2), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025638705649
  • George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.107
  • Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31(2), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271768
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the fob diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Addison Wesley.
  • Hackney, A., Yung, M., Somasundram, K. G., Nowrouzi-Kia, B., Oakman, J., & Yazdani, A. (2022). Working in the digital economy: A systematic review of the impact of work from home arrangements on personal and organizational performance and productivity. PLOS ONE, 17(10), Article e0274728. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274728
  • Hsu, Y.-S., Chen, Y.-P., & Shaffer, M. A. (2021). Reducing work and home cognitive failures: The roles of workplace flextime use and perceived control. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09673-4
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jahoda, M. (1981). Work, employment, and unemployment: Values, theories, and approaches in social research. American Psychologist, 36(2), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.184
  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
  • Kozlowasky, S. W. J., & Klein, K. L. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowsky (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  • Kuoppala, J., Lamminpää, A., Liira, J., & Vainio, H. (2008). Leadership, fob well-being, and health effects - a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 50(8), 904-915. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817e918d
  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
  • Lorca, J. G., & Belli, S. (2023). Towards a funambulist leadership in researchers well-being: Managing equilibriums and tensions in the hybrid work era. Administrative Sciences, 13(2), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020063
  • Lunde, L.-K., Fløvik, L., Christensen, J. O., Johannessen, H. A., Finne, L. B., Jørgensen, I. L., Mohr, B., & Vleeshouwers, J. (2022). The relationship between telework from home and employee health: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 22(1), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12481-2
  • Maitland, A., & Thomson, P. (2014). Future work (expanded and updated): Changing organizational culture for the new world of work. Springer International Publishing.
  • Martinolli, G., Tordera, N., & Sanín Posada, A. (in press). The ECO VI Scale: A climate for Well-Being Scale validation and refinement study.
  • Mazzi, A. (1996). Proceedings of Telecommuting ‘96 Conference. In R. Watson & R. Bostrom (Eds.), Alternative office structures for telecommuters. http://www.cba.uga.edu/tc96/proceedings.html
  • Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (No. 8).
  • Mutiganda, J. C., Wiitavaara, B., Heiden, M., Svensson, S., Fagerström, A., Bergström, G., & Aboagye, E. (2022). A systematic review of the research on telework and organizational economic performance indicators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1035310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035310
  • Newman, A., Round, H., Wang, S., & Mount, M. (2020). Innovation climate: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 73-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12283
  • Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Peiró, J. M., Ayala, Y., Tordera, N., Lorente, L., & Rodríguez, I. (2014). Bienestar sostenible en el trabajo: revisión y reformulación [Sustainable well-being at work: A review and reformulation]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 35(1), 5-14.
  • R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Ramesh Babu, A., & Singh, Y. P. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43(3), 309–-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457402
  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
  • Salazar, F. B. C., Sipiyaruk, K., White, S., & Gallagher, J. E. (2019). Key determinants of health and wellbeing of dentists within the UK: A rapid review of over two decades of research. British Dental Journal, 227(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0485-2
  • Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2022). Cross-cultural evidence of the relationship between subjective well-being and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 38(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a3
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398105
  • Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2011). Organizational climate research: Achievements and the road ahead. In The handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 29-49). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483307961.n3
  • Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Smith, D. B., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2003). Which comes first: Employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 836-851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.836
  • Shifrin, N. V., & Michel, J. S. (2022). Flexible work arrangements and employee health: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress, 36(1), 60-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1936287
  • Taylor, F. W. (2003). Scientific management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203498569
  • Toro, A. F. (1992). Diseño y validación de un instrumento para evaluación del clima organizacional. Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional, 11(1-2), 151 -162.
  • Toro, A. F. (1996). Clima organizacional y productividad laboral. Revista Antioqueña de Economía y Desarrollo, 49, 66 -72.
  • Toro, A. F. (2008). Análisis psicométrico de la encuesta ECO IV de clima organizacional por países. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 27, 44 -57. http://revista.cincel.com.co/cincel/index.php/RPO/article/view/92/pdf>
  • Valls, V., Tomás, I., González-Romá, V., & Rico, R. (2021). The influence of age-based faultlines on team performance: Examining mediational paths. European Management Journal, 39(4), 456-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.10.008
  • Warr, P. (1987). Work, unemployment and mental health. Oxford University Press.
  • Warr, P. (2007). Work, happiness, and unhappiness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Warr, P., & Nielsen, K. (2018). Wellbeing and work performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
  • WHO. (2023). Back-translation. https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
  • Wright, T. A., Cropanzano, R., & Bonett, D. G. (2007). The moderating role of employee positive well being on the relation between job satisfaction and job performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.2.93
  • Zelenski, J. M., Murphy, S. A., & Jenkins, D. A. (2008). The happy-productive worker thesis revisited. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(4), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9087-4
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet