Criterios de elección de centro y segregación escolar en la ciudad de Valencia

  1. Félix Fajardo Magraner 1
  2. Julia Salom Carrasco 1
  3. María Dolores Pitarch Garrido 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
Investigaciones Geográficas (España)

ISSN: 0213-4691,  1989-9890

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 77

Pages: 339-362

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/INGEO.19086 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Investigaciones Geográficas (España)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to discover the patterns that intervene in the choice of school and detect the underlying sociodemographic, economic, and location factors. For this purpose, a survey has been carried out on the potential demand for secondary school places in the city of Valencia. The results show that the main criteria for choosing a school is the proximity between home and school. In addition, the most common way of travelling is by foot. However, this research reveals that travel costs and the means used to complete the school journey are directly related to the socioeconomic characteristics of the fami - lies and the urban morphology of the neighbourhoods. Furthermore, gender differences exist in the care of minors and in the school accompaniment task. For these reasons, the choice of school implies a process of segregation that responds to demographic, socioeconomic, and spatial factors. These processes must be valued by the school network planners to guarantee access to public education in equitable conditions.

Bibliographic References

  • Andersson, E., Malmberg, B., & Östh, J. (2012). Travel-to-school distances in Sweden 2000–2006: changing school geography with equality implications. Journal of Transport Geography, (23), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.022
  • Andrada, M. (2007). Les effets du choix de l’école selon le dispositif mis en œuvre, une approche comparative en terme d’équité, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de l’éducation, Dijon : IREDU-CNRS / Université de Bourgogne.
  • Andre-Bechely, L. (2007). Finding Space and Managing Distance: Public School Choice in an Urban California District. Urban Studies, (44), 1355-1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701302304
  • Barthon, C., & Monfroy, B. (2010). Sociospatial schooling practices: A spatial capital approach. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2010.484978
  • Boterman, W., Musterd, S., Pacchi, C., & Ranci, C. (2019). School segregation in contemporary cities: Socio-spatial dynamics, institutional context and urban outcomes. Urban Studies, 56(15), 3055-3073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019868377
  • Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2015). What parents want: School preferences and school choice. The Economic Journal, 125(587), 1262-1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12153
  • Caballo, M., Gradaílle, R. & Merelas, T. (2012). Servicios socioeducativos y corresponsabilidad en la conciliación de los tiempos familiares: situación de la infancia en la Galicia urbana. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, (20), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2012.20.05
  • Chen, J., Shaw, S.BL., Yu, H., Lu, F., Chai, Y. & Jia, Q. (2011). Exploratory data analysis of activity diary data: a space-time GIS approach. Journal of Transport Geography, (19), 394-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.11.002
  • François, J. C. (2002). Évitement à l’entrée en sixième et division sociale de l’espace scolaire à Paris. LEspace geographique, 31(4), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.3917/eg.314.0307
  • Gortázar, L., Mayor, D. & Montalbán, J. (2020). School Choice Priorities and School Segregation: Evidence from Madrid. FEDEA Estudios sobre Economía Española, 2020-06, Madrid.
  • Hastings, J., Kane, T. J.,& Staiger, D. O. (2009). Heterogeneous preferences and the efficacy of public school choice. NBER Working Paper, (2145), 1-46.
  • Hofflinger, A., Gelber, D., & Cañas, S. T. (2020). School choice and parents’ preferences for school attributes in Chile. Economics of Education Review, (74), 101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101946
  • Holme, J. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177-206. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.2.u6272x676823788r
  • Prados, M. Á. & Lara, B. M. (2015). Responsabilidad familiar. ¿Una cuestión de género?. Revista de Educación Social, (21), 28-44.
  • Poupeau, F., François, J. C., & Couratier, E. (2007). Making the right move: how families are using transfers to adapt to socio-spatial differentiation of schools in the greater Paris region. Journal of education policy, 22(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930601065858
  • Poupeau, F., & François, J. C. (2008). Le sens du placement. Ségrégation résidentielle et ségrégation scolaire. Paris: Raisons d’Agir Éditions.
  • Lindbom, A. (2010). School choice in Sweden: Effects on student performance, school costs, and segregation. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 54(6), 615-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2010.522849
  • Manzo, G. (2013). Educational choices and social interactions: A formal model and a computational test. In F. Engelstad (Coord.), Class and Stratification Analysis (pp. 47-100). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0195-6310(2013)0000030007
  • Meuret, D. Broccolichi, S. & Duru-Bellat, M. (2001). Autonomie et choix des établissements scolaires: finalités, modalités, effets. Les Cahiers de l’irédu, 62. Dijon: Irédu, CNRS-Université de Bourgogne.
  • Miller, H. J., & Shaw, S. L. (2001). Geographic information systems for transportation: principles and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Millington, J., Butler, T., & Hamnett, C. (2014). Aspiration, attainment and success: An agent-based model of distance-based school allocation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 17(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2332
  • Murillo, J., Belavi, G., & Pinilla, L. M. (2018). Segregación escolar público-privada en España. Papers: revista de sociologia, 103(3), 0307-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2392
  • Neutens, T., Delafontaine, M., Scott, D. M., & De Maeyer, P. (2012). An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space–time accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, (23), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.001
  • Östh, J., Andersson, E., & Malmberg, B. (2013). School choice and increasing performance difference: A counterfactual approach. Urban studies, 50(2), 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012452322
  • Sang, S., O’Kelly, M. & Kwan, M.BP. (2011). Examining Commuting Paderns. Urban studies, 48(5), 891-909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010368576
  • Tooley, J. (1997). Choice and diversity in education: a defence, Oxford Review of Education, 23(1), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498970230109
  • Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & De Los Ríos, D. (2010). Segregación escolar en Chile. In S. Martinic & G. Elacqua (Coords.), ¿Fin de Ciclo? Cambios en la gobernanza del sistema educativo (pp. 209-229). Santiago de Chile: Unesco
Data source: Dialnet