Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía

  1. Medina-Lopez, Carmen 1
  2. Marin-Garcia, Juan A. 2
  3. Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01460j859

Revista:
WPOM

ISSN: 1989-9068

Ano de publicación: 2010

Volume: 1

Número: 2

Páxinas: 13-30

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.4995/WPOM.V1I2.786 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: WPOM

Resumo

This paper pretend to be a guide to the systematic literature review useful to know a particular field of study, develop a theoretical framework and establish the appropriate hypothesis on which to focus research. To this end we have sought to specify the actions to take in different phases, which have been defined in five steps to follow in this process: identifying the field of study and analysis period, selection of sources of information, conducting the search (what, where and how), management and treatment of search results and analysis of results. Each of them have been described in detail and exemplified on the basis of our experience. Due to the importance of the systematic review on research, papers like the presented here, help to perform this activity while improving efficiency and increasing the quality of the results.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alfalla-Luque, R. y Medina-López, C. (2009). Supply Chain Management: Unheard of in the 1970s, core to today's company. Business History, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 201–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00076790902726558
  • Alfaro Tanco, J.A., Alvarez Gil, M.J. y Montes, M.J. (2001). Gestión de la Cadena de Suministros: evolución y tratamiento en el ámbito de la Dirección de Operaciones. Actas XI Congreso Nacional de ACEDE, Zaragoza.
  • Amoako-Gyampah, K. y Meredith, J.R. (1989). The Operations Management Research Agenda: An Update. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 8, nº. 3, August, pp. 250-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90027-2
  • Babbar, S. y Prasad, S. (1998). International Purchasing. Inventory Management and Logistics Research. An assessment and agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18 (1), pp. 6-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579810192763
  • Barman, S., Hanna, M.D. y LaForge, R.L. (2001). Perceived relevance and quality of POM journals: a decade later. Journal of Operations Management, 19 (), pp. 367-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00060-7
  • Barman, S., Tersine, RlJ. y Buckley, M.R. (1991). An Empirical Assesment of the Perceived Relevance and Quality of POM-Related Journals by Academicians. Journal of Operations Management, 10 (2), pp. 194-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(91)90022-P
  • Bath School of Management (2004). Journal ratings list. University of Bath, Bath (UK).
  • Burgess, K., Singh, P.J., y Koroglu, R. (2006). Supply chain management: A structured literature review and implications for future research. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26 (7): pp. 703-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672202
  • Chase, R.B. (1980): A Classification and Evaluation of Research in Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 1, nº. 1, pp. 9-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(80)90006-6
  • Donohue, J.M. y Fox, J.B. (2000). A multi-method evaluation of journal in the decision and management sciences by US academics. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 28 (), pp 17-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00024-9
  • Filippini, R. (1997): Operations management research: some reflections on evolution, models and empirical studies in OM. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 17, nº. 7, pp. 655-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579710175583
  • Flynn, B., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R., Bates, D. y Flynn, E. (1990): Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 9, nº. 2, pp. 250-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X
  • Goh, C., Holsapple, C.W., Johnson, L.E. y Tanner, J.R. (1997). Evaluating and classifying POM journals. Journal of Operations Management, 15 (2-May), pp 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00102-7
  • Goh, C.H., Holsapple, C.W., Johnson, L.E. y Tanner, J. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of Influences on POM Research. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 24 (3), pp. 337-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00064-X
  • Hsieh, P. & Chang, P. (2009). An assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 120 (2), pp 540-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.015
  • Holsapple, C., & Lee-Post, A. (2010). Behavior-based analysis of knowledge dissemination channels in operations management. Omega, 38(3/4), pp 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.08.002
  • Karlsson, C., & Ahlström, P. (1998). The history of thought in operations management: A European perspective. Plenary presentation at POMS Conference, Orlando, Florida.
  • Machuca, J.A.D., González-Zamora, M.M. y Aguilar-Escobar, V. G. (2007). Service Operations Management research. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (3), pp 585-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.005
  • Kher, M.H. (1996). Institutional research productivity in production and operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (), pp 55-77.
  • Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2008). Guía de investigación para el desarrollo de la carrera del profesorado: organización de empresas (volumen 13). Valencia: Editorial de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
  • McCutcheon, D.M. y Meredith, J.R. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11 (), pp 239-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
  • Meredith, J.R y Amoako-Gyampah, K. (1990): "The Genealogy of Operations Management", Journal of Operations Management, vol. 9, nº. 2, pp. 146-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90093-S
  • Meredith, J.R., Raturi, A., Amoako-Gyampah, K. y Kaplan, B. (1989): Alternative Research Paradigms in Operations. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 8, nº. 4, Oct., pp. 297-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8
  • Olson, J. E. (2005). Top-25-business-school professors rate journals in operations management and related fields. Interfaces, 35 (4), pp 323-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0149
  • Pannirselvam, G.P., Ferguson, L.A., Ash, R.C. y Siferd, S.P. (1999): Operations management research: un update for the 1990's. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 18, pp. 95-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00009-1
  • Parsons, R. y Globerson, S. (1987): Content Modification in Operations Management. Operations Management Review, vol. 5, nº. 3, pp. 1-10.
  • Piercy, N., Caldwell, N., y Rich, N. (2009). Considering connectivity in operations journals.International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(7), pp. 607-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400910989449
  • Prasad, S. y Babbar, S. (2000): International Operations Management Research. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 18, pp. 209-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00015-7
  • Prasad, S., Babbar, S. y Calis, A. (2000): International Operations Management and Operations Management research: a comparative analysis. OMEGA, vol. 28, pp. 97-110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00031-6
  • Pilkington, A. y Liston-Heyes, C. (1999). Is production and operations management a discipline? A citacion/co-citation study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19 (1), pp. 7-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910244188
  • Rungtusanatham, M.J., Choi, T.Y., Hollingworth, D.G., Wu, Z., y Forza, C. (2003). Survey research in operations management: Historical analyses. Journal of Operations Management, 21 (4), pp. 475-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00020-2
  • Scudder, G.D. y Hill, C.A. (1998): A Review and Classification of Empirical Research in Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 16, pp. 91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00008-9
  • Sekaran, U. y Boggie, R. (2010): Research methods for business. A skill building approach. Ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  • Slack, N., Lewis, M., & Bates, H. (2004). The two worlds of operations management research and practice: Can they meet, should they meet? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24 (4), pp. 372-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570410524640
  • Soteriou, A., Hadjinicola, G. y Patsia, K. (1999). Assessing production and operations management related journals: the European perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 17, pp. 225-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00040-0
  • Swamidass, P.M. (1991): Empirical Science: New Frontier in Operations Management Research. Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, nº. 4, pp. 793-814.
  • Vokurka, R.J. (1996). The Relative Importance of Journal Used in Operations Management Research. A Citation Analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (4), pp. 345-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00092-7
  • Young, S.T., Baird, B.C, y Pullman, M.E. (1996). POM research productivity in U.S. business schools. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (1), pp. 41-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(95)00038-0
Fonte de datos: Dialnet