Las asociaciones de inmigrantes como organizaciones no gubernamentales de desarrolloEntre la agencia y la adaptación institucional

  1. Cloquell Lozano, Alexis 1
  2. Lacomba Vázquez, Joan 1
  1. 1 Universidad Católica de Valencia. España
Revista:
OBETS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales

ISSN: 1989-1385

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 15

Número: 1

Páginas: 105-136

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14198/OBETS2020.15.1.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: OBETS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales

Resumen

Immigrant associations in Spain have progressively become a major player in cooperation development. In this sense, the political arena, favoured by the incorporation of co-development in public policies since 2002, facilitated the design of a framework with new opportunities for immigrant associations. As a result, many of them went through adaptation processes or even organizational hybridisation towards the conversion into NGDO. In this respect and in light of the results of a study about the state of development cooperation entities in Spain, we analyse and discuss whether these processes refer to the capacity for action on the part of immigrant associations, or, on the contrary, if they are framed in mere institutional adaptations facing the new political structure.

Información de financiación

by looking at the transformations of a significant number of entities, originally immigrant associations, into NGDOs, or, at least, their formalisation as such in the corresponding registry of the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID to use its initials in Spanish). This organisational change can be interpreted in different ways: either as a “natural” result of the maturation of the associations and their integration into Spanish society, or as an expression of the immigrants’ own transnational commitment and their interest in promoting development cooperation with their countries of origin, or as a form of institutional adaptation to achieve greater public visibility or better political positioning in relation to the State and other social organisations. The main hypothesis of our work is that the conversion of immigrant associations into NGDOs requires a strategy at different levels in order to achieve greater social and political recognition, not only in Spain but also in their countries of origin. This strategic action could initially be framed by the migrants’ growing capacity of action and the strengthening of their organisational structures. However, the results of the present investigation have given rise to doubts over the extent of such changes. In fact, in 2018, almost half of the NGDOs of immigrant origin registered in the AECID at the start of our investigation were no longer listed as such, which raises questions over the robustness of their conversion process. The information used in this article originates from the R+D+I research project “El aporte del asociacionismo migrante a la sociedad civil española. Nuevos modelos organizativos y de relación con las Organizaciones No Gubernamentales de Desarrollo”1 (CSO2015-66181-R), financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and ERDF funds. The study, whose main objective was to investigate the status of organisations in the field of development cooperation in Spain and their ties with immigrant association, was carried out between 2016 and 2018. The population of the study consisted of 2,072 NGDOs, which as of 12th October 2016, were listed as registered in the AECID registry. Stratified probability sampling was used in this investigation, taking into account the representative population size of each autonomous community. Therefore, a sample size of 332 NGDOs was used, bearing in mind their design, a sampling error of 4.9%, and a confidence interval of 95%. Furthermore, online surveys (created via the ‘Lime Survey’ computer application) and telephone surveys were used to collect the information. The data obtained through the surveys were subject to a preliminary exploitation using the SPSS statistical programme.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abatecola, G (2012). Organizational Adaptation and Survival. A Literature Review. En 72nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Organization and Management Theory Division, Boston, MA, August, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.5465/ AMBPP.2012.13609abstract.
  • Agunias, R. D. y Newland, K. (2012). Hoja de ruta para la participación de las diásporas en el desarrollo. Un manual para políticos y profesionales de los países de origen y de acogida. Ginebra: OIM/MPI.
  • Blairon, J. (2018). “Convocatorias de proyectos. ¿El mundo asociativo rehén de una utopía inversa?”. Las Políticas Sociales en Europa, 41, 85-100.
  • Caponio, T. (2005). “Policy Networks and Immigrants’ Associations in Italy: The Cases of Milan, Bologna and Naples”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31 (5), 931-950. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830500177891
  • Casey, J. (2011). Understanding advocacy: A primer on the policy-making role of nonprofi t organizations. New York: Baruch College, City University of New York, Center for Nonprofi t Strategy.
  • Coordinadora Estatal ONGD (2012). Documento Marco sobre la idea y las prácticas del Codesarrollo. Disponible en: https://coordinadoraongd.org/old/999/ original/20111017_161047_CODESARROLLO_castellano_impreso.pdf
  • Cortés, A. y Sanmartín, A. (2018). “Asociacionismo migrante latinoamericano y codesarrollo. Ámbitos de participación política transnacional”. Papers. Revista de Sociología. Vol. 103, (4), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2506
  • Daum, C. (1995). Les migrants, partenaires de la coopération internationale: le cas des maliens de France. Document de Travail, nº 107. París, OCDE.
  • DOCV 5673/04.01.2008. ACUERDO de 28 de diciembre de 2007, del Consell, por el que aprueba el Plan Director de la Cooperación Valenciana 2008-2011. [2007/15870]
  • DOCV 6155/30.11.2009. ORDEN de 24 de noviembre de 2009, de la Conselleria de Solidaridad y Ciudadanía, por la que se convocan, para el año 2010, subvenciones a proyectos de codesarrollo que realicen organizaciones no gubernamentales para el desarrollo (ONGD), dentro del programa de cooperación internacional al desarrollo. [2009/13625]
  • Echeverri, M., Ibáñez, R., y Ortí, M. (2007). “El codesarrollo desde la perspectiva de la población inmigrante. Ecuador y Marruecos”. En Codesarrollo. Teoría y Práctica. Murcia: Coordinadora de ONGD, 38-45.
  • Fernández Suárez, B. (2018). La alteridad domesticada. La política de integración de inmigrantes en España: actores y territorios. Barcelona: Bellaterra.
  • Gaete, J. M. y Mena, L. (2016). “Los roles de los actores de la sociedad de acogida en la integración de las asociaciones de inmigrantes: una aproximación desde el análisis de redes sociales”. Migraciones, 39, 149-181. https://doi.org/10.14422/ mig.i39.y2016.006
  • Garkisch, M., Heidingsfelder, J. y Beckmann, M. (2017). “Third Sector Organizations and Migration: A Systematic Literature Review on the Contribution of Third Sector Organizations in View of Flight, Migration and Refugee Crises”. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofi t Organizations, 28 (5), 1839-1880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9895-4
  • Kingdon, J.W. (2011). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Longman.
  • Kleist, N. (2014). “Understanding Diaspora Organisations in European Development Cooperation. Approaches, Challenges and Ways Ahead”. New Diversities, 16 (2), 55-69.
  • Koopmans, R. y Statham, P. (2000). “Migration and Ethnic Relations as a Field of Political Contention: An Opportunity Structure Approach”. En R. Koopmans y P. Statham (Eds.), Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13-56.
  • Koopmans, R. (2004). “Migrant mobilisation and political opportunities: variation among German cities and a comparison with the United Kingdom and the Netherlands”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30 (3), 449-470. https://doi.org /10.1080/13691830410001682034
  • Lacomba, J., Boni, A., Cloquell, A. y Soledad, C. (2014). “Immigrant Associations and Co-development Policies. Among the Opportunities for Strengthening and the Risks of Cooptation in the Case of Valencia Region (Spain)”. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofi t Organizations, 25 (4), 1852–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9491-9
  • Giugni, M. y Morariu, M. (2007). The perception of political opportunities by immigrants and their impact on political participation: Italians and Kosovars in Geneva. Paper for the 4th ECPR Conference, Section on “The Political Participation of Immigrants in European Cities, Pisa, 6-8 September 2007.
  • McAdam, D. (1999). “Orígenes terminológicos, problemas actuales y futuras líneas de investigación”. En D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy y M. N. Zald. (Coords.), Movimientos sociales: perspectivas comparadas. Madrid: Istmo, 49-70.
  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., Zald, Mayer N. (Coords.). (1999). “Oportunidades, estructuras de movilización y procesos enmarcadores: hacia una perspectiva sintética y comparada de los movimientos sociales”. En D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy y M. N. Zald. (Coords.), Movimientos sociales: perspectivas comparadas. (pp. 21-46). Madrid: Istmo, 21-46.
  • Mertens, S. y Marée, M. (2018). “¿Dónde se sitúan las asociaciones? Los retos de las fronteras porosas”. Las Políticas Sociales en Europa, 41, 21-40.
  • Meyer, M. and Simsa, R. (2018). “Organizing the Unexpected: How Civil Society Organizations Dealt with the Refugee Crisis”. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofi t Organizations, 29 (6), 1159-1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11266-018-00050-y
  • Moraes, N. y Cutillas, I. (2018). “La estructura de oportunidad política transnacional y el giro relacional en el análisis de la participación política y el asociacionismo migrante”. Papers, 103/4, 605-624. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2508
  • Naïr, S. (1997). Rapport de bilan et d’orientation sur la politique de codéveloppement liée aux fl ux migratoires. Paris: Ministère d’Affaires Étrangères https://doi.org/10.3406/ homig.1998.3193
  • Nyhagen, L. (2008). “Political and cultural ethnic mobilisation: The role of immigrant associations in Norway”. Journal of Ethnic Migration Studies, 34 (6), 935-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802211257
  • Odmalm, P. (2004). “Civil Society, Migrant Organisations and Political Parties: Theoretical Linkages and Applications to the Swedish Context”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30 (3), 471-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830410001 682043
  • Paspuel, V. (2009). “Visión y experiencia del codesarrollo desde las asociaciones de personas migradas”. En Lacomba, J. et al. El codesarrollo y su gestión: haciendo camino al andar. Madrid: CIDEAL, 139-155.
  • Piras, G., Cazarín, R., Rennau, A., Bianchi, G., y Blanco, C. (2012). “El asociacionismo de la población andina en Madrid y el País Vasco. Voces sobre el nexo migración y desarrollo”. En Actas del VII Congreso sobre Migraciones. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
  • Pirkkalainen, P., Abdirizak, M., Aaltio, I. (2018). “Third Sector Hybridization and Migrant Integration: Cases of Two Migrant Youth Organizations in Finland”. EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 23, (2), 24-33.
  • Quadir, F. y Orgocka, A. (2014). “Exploring the role of Western NGOs in creating and strengthening local NGOs in Albania”. The European Journal of Development Research, 26 (5), 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.31
  • Rathgeb, S. (2010). “Hybridization and nonprofi t organizations: The governance challenge”. Policy and Society, 29 (3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. polsoc.2010.06.003
  • Riojas, C. (2010). “Adaptaciones institucionales en la época neoliberal”. Política y Cultura, 34, 131-157.
  • Sanmartín, A. (2011). “Las asociaciones de migrantes en las actuaciones de codesarrollo. Un estudio desde la ciudad de Madrid”. Migraciones, 30, 71-99.
  • Sardinha, J. (2007). Providing voices? Civic participation opportunities for immigrants in Portugal. POLITIS-Working paper, No. 7.
  • Senn, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Skelcher, C. y Rathgeb, S. (2015). “Theorizing hybridity: institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: the case of nonprofi ts”. Public Administration, 93 (2), 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12105
  • Soledad, C. (2011). El movimiento a favor de la inmigración en Valencia. Más allá del desarrollo. Tesis Doctoral. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
  • Tarrow, S. (1997). El poder en movimiento. Los movimientos sociales, la acción colectiva y la política. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Valenzuela, E. y Yévenes, P. (2015). Aproximación al concepto de cooptación política: la maquinaria presicrática y sus formas, Polis, 40. [En línea]. URL: http://polis. revues.org/10834, Publicado el 17 mayo 2015, consultado el 30 septiembre 2016.