Antecedentes y dinamismo de la ambidestreza organizativa en las Pymes

Referencias bibliográficas

• Arwal, R. & Hefalt, C. e. (2009). strategic Renewal of organizations. Organization Science, 20 (2), 281-293.
• Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, d. W. (1988). structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psy- chological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411-423.
• Armstrong, J. s. & overton, t. s. (1977). estimating nonresponse Bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
• Auh, s. & menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1652-1661.
• Barkema H.G. & vermeulen, F. (1998). international expansion through start-up or acquisitions: a learning perspective. Academy of Man- agement Journal, 41 (1), 7-27.
• Beckman, C.m. (2006). the influence of founding team company af- filiations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 741-758.
• Benner, m. J. & tushman, m. l. (2003). exploration, exploitation, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256.
• Birkinshaw, J. & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an or- ganization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45 (4), 47-55.
• Blarr, W. H. (2012). Organizational Ambidexterity: Implications for the Strategy-Performance Linkage. leipzig: springer.
• Brion, s., Favre-Bonté, v. & mothe, C. (2008). Quelles formes d’ambidextrie pur combiner innovations d’exploitation et d’exploration? Management International, 12 (3), 29-44.
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, e., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20 (4), 781-796.
• Cao, Q., simsek, Z. & Zhang, H. (2010). modeling the Joint impact of the Ceo and the tmt on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (7), 1272-1296.
• Devisser, m., de Weerd-nederhof, P., Faems, d., song, m., van looy, B. & visscher, K. (2009). structural ambidexterity in nPd processes: a firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance. Technovation, 30, 291–299.
• Eisenhardt, K.m., Furr, n.R. & Bingham, C.B. (2010). microfundations of Performance: Balancing efficiency and Flexibility in dynamic envi- ronments. Organization Science, 21 (6), 1263-1273.
• Eisenhardt, K.m. & martin, J. (2000). dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
• Escribá, a. & safón, v. (2007). la empresa valenciana: estrategias Cor- porativas y Competitivas, en la Comunidad valenciana en el um- bral del siglo XXi. estrategias de desarrollo económico. Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat de València, 427-447.
• Fornell, C. & larcker, d.F. (1981). evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (Feb), 39-50.
• Gupta, a.K., smith, K.G. & shalley, C.e. (2006). the interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 693-706.
• Gibson, C.B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). the antecedent, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2), 209-226.
• He, Z. & Wong, P. K. (2004). exploration and exploitation: an empir- ical test of the ambidextrous hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-496.
• Heavy, C. & simsek, Z. (2010). a dynamic capabilities model of organi- zational ambidexterity, Best paper of the 10th european academy of management annual Conference, Rome.
• Helfat, C.e. & Peteraf, m.a. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabil- ities: progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organiza- tion, 7 (1), 91-102.
• Iborra, m. & dolz, C. (2007). el papel del conflicto en la exploración y explotación de conocimiento en las adquisiciones, M@n@gement, 10 (1), 1-21.
• Jansen, J.J.P., tempelaar, m.P., van den Bosch, F.a.J. & volberda, H.W. (2009). structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the medi- ating Role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20 (4), 797-811.
• Kauppila, o.P. (2010). Creating ambidexterity by integrating and bal- ancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Or- ganization Science, 8 (4), 283–312.
• Koza, m.P. & lewin, a.y. (1998). the co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9, 255-264.
• Lavie, d., Kang, J. & Rosenkopf, l. (2010). Balance Within and across domains: the Performance implications of exploration and ex- ploitation in alliances, submitted to the 7th atlanta Competitive advantage Conference
• Lavie, d. & Rosenkopf, l. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploita- tion in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 797-818.
• Lavie, d., stettner, U. & tushman, m.l. (2010). exploration and exploi- tation within and across organizations. The Academy of Manage- ment Annals, 4 (1), 109-155.
• Leonard-Barton, d. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a par- adox in managing new product development. Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 13, 111-125.
• Levinthal, d. & march, J. (1993). myopia of learning. Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 14, 95-112.
• Lin, Z., yang, H. & demirkan, i. (2007). the Performance Consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance Formations: empirical in- vestigation and Computational theorizing. Management Science, 53 (10), 1645-1658.
• López, e., García, F. e. & García, s. m. (2012). de la organización que aprende a la organización ambidiestra: evolución teórica del apre- ndizaje organizativo. Cuadernos de Administración, 25 (45), 11-37.
• Lubatkin, m. H., simsek, Z., ling, y. & veiga, J. F. (2006). ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioural integration. Journal of Management, 32 (5), 646-672.
• March, J. G. (1991). exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2 (4), 71-87.
• McCarthy, i.P. & Gordon, B.R. (2011). achieving contextual ambidex- terity in R&d organizations: a management control system ap- proach. R&D Management, 41 (3), 240-258.
• Mcnamara, P. & Baden-Fuller, C. (1999). lessons from the Celltech Case: Balancing knowledge exploration and exploitation in orga- nizational renewal. British Journal of Management, 10, 291-307.
• Miller, d., lant, t. K., milliken, F. J. & Korn, H. J. (1996). the evolution of strategic simplicity: exploring two models of organizational adap- tation. Journal of Management, 22, 863-887.
• Nosella, a., Cantarello, s. & Filippini, R. (2012). the intellectual struc- ture of organizational ambidexterity: a bibliographic investi- gation into the state of the art. Strategic Organization, 10 (4), 450-465.
• Nunnally, J. C. & Berstein, i. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edition). new york: mcGrawHill.
• O’Reilly III, C.A. & Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research on Orga- nizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
• O’Reilly III, C.A. & Tushman, M.L. (2011). Organizational Ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Manage- ment Review, 53 (4), 5-22.
• Pearson, R.W., Ross, m. & dawes, R.m. (1994). Personal recall and the limits of restrospective questions in surveys, in tanur, J.m. (ed.): Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. Russell sage Foundation, ny, 65–94.
• Piao, m. (2010). thriving in the new: implication of exploration on or- ganizational longevity. Journal of Management, 36, 1529-1554
• Podsakoff, P. m., macKenzie, s. B., lee, J. y. & Podsakoff, n. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879-903.
• Raisch, s. (2008). Balanced structures: designing organizations for prof- itable growth. Long Range Planning, 41, 483-508.
• Raisch, s. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). organizational ambidexterity: ante- cedents, outcomes and moderators. Journal of Management, 34 (3), 375-409.
• Raisch, s., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. & tushman, m.l. (2009). organiza- tional ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20 (4), 1-12.
• Rothaermel, F.t. & deeds, d.l. (2004). exploration and exploitation al- liances in biothechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201–222.
• Russo, a. & vurro, C. (2010). Cross-boundary ambidexterity: balancing exploration and exploitation in the fuel cell industry. European Management Review, 30-45
• Schumacker, R.e. & lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modelling. second edition. new york: Psychology Press.
• Siggelkow, n. & levinthal, d. a. (2003). temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational ap- proaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14, 650-669.
• Simsek, Z. (2009). organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 864-894.
• Simsek,Z., Heavy, C., veiga, J.F. & souder, d. (2009). a typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, An- tecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (5), 597-624.
• Sydow, J., schreyögg, G. & Koch, J. (2009). organizational path depen- dence: opening the Black box. Academy of Managament Review, 34 (4), 689-710. Teece, d.J., Pissano, G. & shuen, a. (1997). dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509-533. Tushman, m.l., smith, W.K. & Binns, a. (2011). the ambidextrous Ceo. Harvard Business Review, 89 (6), 74-80.
• Vanhaverbeke, W., Gilsing, v., Beerkens, B. & duysters, G. (2007). Explo- ration and Exploitation in Technology-based Alliance Networks. eindhoven Center for innovation studies - eindhoven University of technology Hasselt University.
• Venkatraman, n., lee, CH. & iyer, B. (2007). strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: a longitudinal test in the software sector. http://www.softwareecosystems.com/SMJManuscript_revised. pdf. Consultado el 30 de marzo de 2012.
• Vermeulen, F. (2005). How acquisitions can revitalize companies. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46 (4), 44-51.
• Vermeulen, F. & Barkema, H. (2001). learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 457-478.
• Wagner, m. (2011). to explore or to exploit? an empirical investiga- tion of acquisitions by large incumbents. Research Policy, 40, 1217-1225.
• Zollo, m. (2010). superstitious learning with Rare strategic decisions: theory and evidence from Corporate acquisitions. Organization Science, 20 (5), 894-908