Developing mindful organizing in teamsA participation climate is not enough, teams need to feel safe to challenge their leaders

  1. Michelle Renecle 1
  2. Francisco J. Gracia 1
  3. Inés Tomas 1
  4. José M. Peiró 1
  1. 1 University of Valencia, Spain
Revista:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 36

Número: 3

Páginas: 181-193

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5093/JWOP2020A18 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Resumen

La organización consciente en equipos es una capacidad colectiva que permite a los equipos anticipar y recuperarse rápidamente de eventos inesperados. Esta capacidad colectiva es especialmente relevante en entornos de alto riesgo donde la fiabilidad en el desempeño es de máxima importancia. En este artículo contribuimos al desarrollo de la teoría de la organización consciente mostrando cómo interactúan dos condiciones de participación y comunicación en la primera línea (seguridad percibida para elevar propuestas críticas y clima de participación) para predecir la organización consciente. Además, arrojamos luz sobre la controversia acerca de los efectos de la organización consciente en la experiencia subjetiva de los equipos en el trabajo, mostrando que lleva a mayor satisfacción laboral del equipo y en consecuencia disminuye la propensión de abandonar la organización a nivel individual. Estas relaciones se pusieron a prueba con un diseño de intervalo temporal con dos momentos de recogida de datos usando una muestra de 47 equipos del sector de la energía nuclear.

Información de financiación

Cite this article as: Renecle, M., Gracia, F. J., Tomas, I., & Peiró, J. M. (2020). Developing mindful organizing in teams: A participation climate is not enough, teams need to feel safe to challenge their leaders. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 36(3), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a18 Funding: This project was funded by the Prometeo Program for Excellence Groups (Conselleria d’Educació, Investigació Cultura i Esport. Direcció General d’Universitat, Investigació i Ciència) PROMETEO-2016-138 funded by the Generalitat Valenciana. Correspondence: Francisco.Gracia@uv.es (F. J. Gracia).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ausserhofer, D., Schubert, M., Desmedt, M., Blegen, M. A., De Geest, S., & Schwendimann, R. (2013). The association of patient safety climate and nurse-related organizational factors with selected patient outcomes: A cross- sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(2), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.04.007
  • Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179
  • Barton, M. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Vogus, T. J., & DeWitt, T. (2015). Performing under uncertainty: Contextualized engagement in wildland firefighting. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(2), 74-83.
  • Bartscht, J. (2015). Why systems must explore the unknown to survive in VUCA environments. Kybernetes, 44(2), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-09-2014-0189
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • Bigley, G. A., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academic Management Journal, 44(6), 1281-300. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069401
  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (p. 349-381). Jossey-Bass.
  • Brown, R. D., & Hauenstein, N. M. (2005). Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organizational Research Methods, 8(2), 165-184.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Browne, M. W., & Du Toit, S. H. C. (1992). Automated fitting on nonstandard models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27(2), 269-300. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2702_13
  • Burgeon, J. K., Berger, C. R., & Waldron, V. R. (2000). Mindfulness and interpersonal communication. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00154
  • Burke, M. J., & Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating inter-rater agreement with the average deviation index: A user’s guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002002
  • Burke, M. J., Finkelstein, L. M., & Dusig, M. S. (1999). On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819921004
  • Carlo, J. L., Lyytinen, K., & Boland, Jr., R. J. (2012). Dialectics of collective minding: Contradictory appropriations of information technology in a high-risk project. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(4), 1081-1108. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703499
  • Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5
  • Coomber, B., & Barriball, K. L. (2007). Impact of job satisfaction components on intent to leave and turnover for hospital-based nurses: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(2), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.004
  • De Rivera, J. (1992). Emotional climate: Social structure and emotional dynamics. In A preliminary draft of this chapter was discussed at a workshop on emotional climate sponsored by the Clark European Center in Luxembourg. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
  • Dierynck, B., Leroy, H., Savage, G. T., & Choi, E. (2017). The role of individual and collective mindfulness in promoting occupational safety in health care. Medical care research and review, 74(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558716629040
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
  • Ford, J. L. (2018). Revisiting high-reliability organizing: Obstacles to safety and resilience. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-04-2017-0034
  • George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.107
  • González, P., Peiró, J. M., & Bravo, M. J. (1996). Calidad de vida laboral. In J. M. Peiró & F. Prieto (Eds.), Tratado de psicología del trabajo (Vol. I, pp. 161-186). Síntesis.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
  • Hendriks, H., Putte, B. V. D., & de Bruijn, G. J. (2015). Subjective reality: The influence of perceived and objective conversational valence on binge drinking determinants. Journal of Health Communication, 20(7), 859-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018570
  • Hollnagel, E. (1993). The phenotype of erroneous actions. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies, 39(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1051
  • Hoy, W. K., Gage III, C. Q., & Tarter, C. J. (2006). School mindfulness and faculty trust: Necessary conditions for each other? Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 236-255.
  • Hox, J. J., Maas, C. J., & Brinkhuis, M. J. (2010). The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Neerlandica, 64(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00445.x
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huang, Y. H., Lee, J., McFadden, A. C., Murphy, L. A., Robertson, M. M., Cheung, J. H., & Zohar, D. (2016). Beyond safety outcomes: An investigation of the impact of safety climate on job satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover using social exchange theory as the theoretical framework. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 248-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.007
  • Kim, H., & Kao, D. (2014). A meta-analysis of turnover intention predictors among US child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(Part 3), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.09.015
  • Klein, K. J., Ziegert, J. C., Knight, A. P., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 590-621. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.4.590
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford.
  • Knight, A. P. (2004). Measuring mindful organizing and exploring its nomological network (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12): industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333-375). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 22, pp. 137-173). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60307-x
  • LaPorte, T. R., & Consolini, P. M. (1991). Working in practice but not in theory: theoretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 1(1), 19-48.
  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852.
  • Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less- mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502-513. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0197
  • López de Castro, B., Gracia, F. J., Tomás, I., & Peiró, J. M. (2017). The Safety Culture Enactment Questionnaire (SCEQ): Theoretical model and empirical validation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 103, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.018
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39 (1), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
  • Madsen, P. M., Desai, V. M., Roberts, K. H., & Wong, D. (2006). Mitigating hazards through continuing design: The birth and evolution of a paediatric intensive care unit. Organizational Science, 17(2), 239-248.
  • Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2016). Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. Bmj, 353, 2139.
  • Martínez-Córcoles, M., & Vogus, T. J. (2020). Mindful organizing for safety. Safety Science, 124, e104614-e104614.
  • Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. 1999. The structure of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249-265.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables (Version 3). Muthén & Muthén.
  • Novak, J. M., & Sellnow, T. L. (2009). Reducing organizational risk through participatory communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(4), 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903233168
  • Osborn, R. N., & Jackson, D. H. (1988). Leaders, riverboat gamblers, or purposeful unintended consequences in the management of complex, dangerous technologies. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 924-947. https://doi.org/10.2307/256345
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review Psychology, 63, 539-569.
  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
  • Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis. Psychological Methods, 21, 189-205.
  • Ray, J. L., Baker, L. T., & Plowman, D. A. (2011). Organizational mindfulness in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2), 188-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.62798929
  • Renecle, M., Tomás, I., Gracia, F. J., & Peiró, J. M. (2020). Spanish validation of the mindful organizing scale: A questionnaire for the assessment of collective mindfulness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 134, 105351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105351
  • Rerup, C. (2009). Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organizational Science, 20(5), 876-893. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0467
  • Roberts, K. H., Stout, S. K., & Halpern, J. J. (1994). Decision dynamics in two high reliability military organizations. Management Science, 40(5), 614-624. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.5.614
  • Rochlin, G. I. (1993). Essential friction: Error-control in organizational behavior. In The necessity of friction (pp. 196-232). Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95905-9_11
  • Rochlin, G. I., La Porte, T. R., & Roberts, K. H. (1987). The self-designing high-reliability organization: Aircraft carrier flight operations at sea. Naval War College Review, 40(4), 76-90.
  • Roe, R. A. (2008). Time in applied psychology: The study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. European Psychologist, 13(1), 37-52.
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2013). Beginning behavioral research: A conceptual primer (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Sandelands, L. E., & Stablein, R. E. (1987). The concept of organization mind. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 5, 135-161.
  • Schulman, P. R. (1993). The negotiated order of organizational reliability. Administration & Society, 25(3), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979302500305
  • Schulman, P. R. (2004). General attributes of safe organisations. BMJ Quality & Safety, 13(suppl 2), ii39-ii44.
  • Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2009). Common method variance or measurement bias? The problem and possible solutions. The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (346-362). Sage.
  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
  • Sutcliffe, K. M., Vogus, T. J., & Dane, E. (2016). Mindfulness in organizations: A cross-level review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062531
  • Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrical, 38(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
  • Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228
  • Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L.L., & McLean Parks, J. (1995). Extra-role behaviours: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In B. M. Staw & L. L., Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 17, pp. 215-285). Jai Press, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068100200307
  • Vogus, T. J. (2011). Mindful organizing: Establishing and extending the foundations of highly reliable performance. In G. M. Spreitzer & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 664-676). Oxford Handbooks Online.
  • Vogus, T. J., Cooil, B., Sitterding, M., & Everett, L. Q. (2014). Safety organizing, emotional exhaustion, and turnover in hospital nursing units. Medical Care, 52(10), 870-876. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000169
  • Vogus, T. J., & Rerup, C. (2017). Sweating the “small stuff”: High-reliability organizing as a foundation for sustained superior performance. Strategic Organization, 16(2), 227- 238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739535
  • Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). The Safety Organizing Scale: Development and validation of a behavioral measure of safety culture in hospital nursing units. Medical care, 45(1), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000244635.61178.7a
  • Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2012). Organizational mindfulness and mindful organizing: A reconciliation and path forward. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 722-735. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0002c
  • Vogus, T. J., & Welbourne, T. M. (2003). Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(7), 877-903. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.221
  • Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393372
  • Weick, K., & Sutcliffe, K. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of uncertainty. Wiley.
  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of mindful organizing. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 81-123). Jai Press.
  • Westrum, R. (1988). Organizational and inter-organizational thought. Paper presented at the World Bank Conference on Safety Control and Risk Management.
  • Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait- multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900101
  • Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695-719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450