Paradigma pragmático-funcional en la rehabilitación de la afasia

  1. Hernández Sacristán, Carlos
  2. Rosell Clari, Vicent
Revista:
Pragmalinguistica

ISSN: 1133-682X

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Investigación en Lingüística Clínica

Número: 2

Páginas: 199-215

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.25267/PRAGMALINGUISTICA.2020.IEXTRA2.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Pragmalinguistica

Resumen

Durante las últimas dos décadas, la investigación sobre la rehabilitación de la afasia ha desarrollado una visión pragmática y funcional del lenguaje, lo que ha llevado a una orientación cada vez más multifacética del trabajo terapéutico. En este enfoque pragmático-funcional de la rehabilitación de la afasia convergen diferentes programas concebidos de forma independiente, centrando la terapia en la dimensión relacional del lenguaje, que incluye: las interrelaciones funcionales entre los componentes del sistema lingüístico; la función comunicativa y el uso del lenguaje en contextos naturales como las conversaciones cotidianas; las interrelaciones entre el comporta-miento verbal y otros medios semióticos como la gestualidad; y las interrelaciones entre el lenguaje y otras habilidades cognitivas. Estos precedentes pue-den ser considerados en conjunto para esbozar un nuevo paradigma para la rehabilitación de la afasia. Las dimensiones básicas de este paradigma y la relación jerárquica entre las mismas, son presentadas en el presente estudio

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALI, M. et al. (2013): “More outcomes than trials: A call for consistent data collection across stroke rehabilitation trials”, International Journal of Stroke, 8, pp. 18-24.
  • ARMSTRONG, E. & FERGUSON, A. (2010): “Language, meaning, context, and functional communication”, Aphasiology, 24, pp. 480-496.
  • BARKLEY, R. A. (1997): “Behavioural inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD”, Psychological Bulletin, 121, pp. 65-94.
  • BRADY M. C. et al. (2012): “Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke”, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, Art. No.: CD000425.
  • BRADY, M. C. et al. (2014): “Time for a step change? Improving the efficiency, relevance, reliability, validity and transparency of aphasia rehabilitation research through core outcome measures, a common data set and improved reporting criteria”, Aphasiology, 28, pp. 1385-1392.
  • CARTER, A.; CONNOR, L. y DROMERICK, A. (2010): “Rehabilitation after stroke: Current state of science”, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 10, pp. 158-166.
  • FRANCIS, D. R.; CLARK, N. & HUMPHREY, G. W. (2002): “Circumlocution-induced naming. A treatment for effecting generalisation in anomia?”, Aphasiology, 16, pp. 234-259.
  • FRANKEL, T. & PENN, C. (2007): “Perseveration and conversation in TBI: Response to pharmacological intervention”, Aphasiology, 21, pp. 1039-1078.
  • FRANKEL, T.; PENN, C. & ORMOND-BROWN, D. (2007): “Executive dysfunction as an explanatory basis for conversation symptoms of aphasia: A pilot study.” Aphasiology, 21, pp. 814-828.
  • GALLARDO PAÚLS, B. y HERNÁNDEZ SACRISTÁN, C. (2013): Lingüística clínica. Un enfoque funcional sobre las alteraciones del lenguaje, Madrid: Arco Libros.
  • GOODWIN, C. (1995): “Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man”, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, pp. 233-260.
  • GOODWIN, C. (2000): “Pointing and the collaborative construction of meaning in aphasia”, Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium About Language and Society, Austin: University of Texas, pp. 67-76.
  • HALLIDAY, M. A. K. (1978): Language as a Social Semiotic: Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London: Edward Arnold
  • HELM-ESTABROOKS, N. & ALBERT, M. L. (1991): Manual of Aphasia Therapy, Austin TX: PRO-ED.
  • HELM-ESTABROOKS, N. & ALBERT, M. L. (2003): Manual of Aphasia and Aphasia Therapy, Austin TX: PRO-ED.
  • HERNÁNDEZ SACRISTÁN, C. (2019): “Anomia: Una perspectiva enaccionista sobre la incapacidad de acceso a las unidades léxicas”, Pruñonosa-Tomás, M. (ed.): Lenguaje, paisaje lingüístico y enacción, Valencia, Tirant Humanidades, pp. 261-275.
  • HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C.; ROSELL-CLARI, V. & MACDONALD, J. E. (2011): “Proximal and distal. Rethinking linguistic form and use for clinical purposes”, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25, pp. 37-52.
  • HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. et al. (2012): “On natural metalinguistic abilities in aphasia. A preliminary study”, Aphasiology, 26, pp. 199-219.
  • HOCKETT, C. (1960): “The origin of speech”, Scientific American, 203, pp. 88-96.
  • HOLLAND, A. (1979): “Some practical considerations in aphasia rehabilitation”, Sullivan, M. y Kommers, M. (eds.): Rationale for adult aphasia therapy, Omaha: University of Nebraska Medical Center, pp. 167-180.
  • HOLLAND, A. (1980): Communicative Abilities in Daily Living: A test of functional communication for adults, Baltimore: University Park Press.
  • HOLLAND, A. (1991): “Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia”, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, pp. 197-211.
  • JOHNSON, M. L. et al. (2014): “An Enhanced Protocol for Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy II: A Case Series”, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, pp. 60-72.
  • KAGAN, A. (1998): “Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversational partners”, Aphasiology, 12, pp. 816-830.
  • KAGAN, A. et al. (2001): “Training volunteers as conversation partners using Supported conversation for adults with aphasia (SCA): A controlled study”, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, pp. 624–638.
  • MCNEIL, M. R. et al. (1995): “Behavioral and pharmacological treatment of lexical-semantic deficits in a single patient with primary progressive aphasia”, American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 4, pp. 76-87.
  • PENN, C. et al. (2010): “Executive function and conversational strategies in bilingual aphasia”, Aphasiology, 24 (2), pp. 288-308.
  • PERKINS, M. (2000): “The scope of pragmatic disability. A cognitive approach”, Müller, N. (ed): Pragmatics in Speech and Language Pathology: Studies in Clinical Applications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 6-28.
  • ROSE, M. (2006): “The utility of arm and hand gestures in the treatment of aphasia”, Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 8, pp. 92-109.
  • ROSE, M. & DOUGLAS, J. (2003): “Limb apraxia, pantomime, and lexical gesture in aphasic speakers: preliminary findings”, Aphasiology, 17, pp. 453-464.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. y HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2014): MetAphAs. Protocolo de Exploración de Habilidades Metalingüísticas en la Afasia, Valencia: NauLlibres.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2017): “Anomia rehabilitation viewed from a pragmatic-functional paradigm. A case study”, Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 7, pp. 47-70.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2018a): MetAphAs. Metalanguage in Aphasia Assessment, Valencia: NauLlibres (Libro electrónico en Google books).
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2018b): “Aphasiarehabilitationfrom a pragmatic-functionalparadigm. A comparative study of two patients with different performance profiles in natural metalinguistic tasks”, Aphasiology, 32 (S1), pp. 50-51.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & VALLES-GONZÁLEZ, B. (2016): “Theory of Mind (ToM) and language: stimulating metalinguistic skills in people with dementia”, RevistaCoDAS, 28, pp. 252-260.
  • SALTER, K. L. et al. (2007): “Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation”, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86, pp. 1007-1012.
  • SANDT-KOENDERMAN M. E., MEULEN I. & RIBBERS G. M. (2012): “Aphasia rehabilitation: more than treating the language disorder”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (1), pp. 1-3.
  • SARNO, M. T. (1969): The Functional Communication Profile: Manual of directions, New York: Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. SIMMONS-MACKIE, N. et al. (2010): “Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: A Systematic Review”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, pp. 1814-1837.
  • SPENCER, K. A. et al. (2000): “Examining the facilitative effects of rhyme in a patient with output lexical damage”, Aphasiology, 14, pp. 567-584.
  • TOMASELLO, M. (2003): Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978): Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • WILKINSON, R. & WIELAERT, S. (2012): “Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: Can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation?”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (1), pp. 70-76.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet