Paradigma pragmático-funcional en la rehabilitación de la afasia

  1. Hernández Sacristán, Carlos
  2. Rosell Clari, Vicent
Revista:
Pragmalinguistica

ISSN: 1133-682X

Ano de publicación: 2020

Título do exemplar: Investigación en Lingüística Clínica

Número: 2

Páxinas: 199-215

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.25267/PRAGMALINGUISTICA.2020.IEXTRA2.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Pragmalinguistica

Resumo

Au cours des deux dernières décennies, la recherche sur la réhabilitation de l'aphasie a développé une vision pragmatique et fonctionnelle du langage, conduisant à une orientation de plus en plus multidimensionnelle du travail thérapeutique. Différents programmes de conception indépendante se rencontrent dans cette approche pragmatique-fonctionnel de la réhabilitation de l'aphasie, pour centrer la thérapie sur la dimension relationnelle du langage, qui comprend: les interrelations fonctionnelles entre les constituants du système linguistique; la fonction communicationnelle et l'utilisation du langage dans un contexte naturel comme la pratique des conversations quotidiennes; les relations entre la conduite verbale et les autres moyens sémiotiques comme les gestes et les rapports entre le langage et les autres capacités cognitives. Ces précédents peuvent être considérés ensemble afin de tracer un nouveau paradigme pour la réhabilitation de l'aphasie. Les dimensions fondamentales de ce paradigme, et la relation hiérarchique entre elles, sont présentées dans cette étude

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALI, M. et al. (2013): “More outcomes than trials: A call for consistent data collection across stroke rehabilitation trials”, International Journal of Stroke, 8, pp. 18-24.
  • ARMSTRONG, E. & FERGUSON, A. (2010): “Language, meaning, context, and functional communication”, Aphasiology, 24, pp. 480-496.
  • BARKLEY, R. A. (1997): “Behavioural inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD”, Psychological Bulletin, 121, pp. 65-94.
  • BRADY M. C. et al. (2012): “Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke”, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, Art. No.: CD000425.
  • BRADY, M. C. et al. (2014): “Time for a step change? Improving the efficiency, relevance, reliability, validity and transparency of aphasia rehabilitation research through core outcome measures, a common data set and improved reporting criteria”, Aphasiology, 28, pp. 1385-1392.
  • CARTER, A.; CONNOR, L. y DROMERICK, A. (2010): “Rehabilitation after stroke: Current state of science”, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 10, pp. 158-166.
  • FRANCIS, D. R.; CLARK, N. & HUMPHREY, G. W. (2002): “Circumlocution-induced naming. A treatment for effecting generalisation in anomia?”, Aphasiology, 16, pp. 234-259.
  • FRANKEL, T. & PENN, C. (2007): “Perseveration and conversation in TBI: Response to pharmacological intervention”, Aphasiology, 21, pp. 1039-1078.
  • FRANKEL, T.; PENN, C. & ORMOND-BROWN, D. (2007): “Executive dysfunction as an explanatory basis for conversation symptoms of aphasia: A pilot study.” Aphasiology, 21, pp. 814-828.
  • GALLARDO PAÚLS, B. y HERNÁNDEZ SACRISTÁN, C. (2013): Lingüística clínica. Un enfoque funcional sobre las alteraciones del lenguaje, Madrid: Arco Libros.
  • GOODWIN, C. (1995): “Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man”, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, pp. 233-260.
  • GOODWIN, C. (2000): “Pointing and the collaborative construction of meaning in aphasia”, Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium About Language and Society, Austin: University of Texas, pp. 67-76.
  • HALLIDAY, M. A. K. (1978): Language as a Social Semiotic: Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London: Edward Arnold
  • HELM-ESTABROOKS, N. & ALBERT, M. L. (1991): Manual of Aphasia Therapy, Austin TX: PRO-ED.
  • HELM-ESTABROOKS, N. & ALBERT, M. L. (2003): Manual of Aphasia and Aphasia Therapy, Austin TX: PRO-ED.
  • HERNÁNDEZ SACRISTÁN, C. (2019): “Anomia: Una perspectiva enaccionista sobre la incapacidad de acceso a las unidades léxicas”, Pruñonosa-Tomás, M. (ed.): Lenguaje, paisaje lingüístico y enacción, Valencia, Tirant Humanidades, pp. 261-275.
  • HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C.; ROSELL-CLARI, V. & MACDONALD, J. E. (2011): “Proximal and distal. Rethinking linguistic form and use for clinical purposes”, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25, pp. 37-52.
  • HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. et al. (2012): “On natural metalinguistic abilities in aphasia. A preliminary study”, Aphasiology, 26, pp. 199-219.
  • HOCKETT, C. (1960): “The origin of speech”, Scientific American, 203, pp. 88-96.
  • HOLLAND, A. (1979): “Some practical considerations in aphasia rehabilitation”, Sullivan, M. y Kommers, M. (eds.): Rationale for adult aphasia therapy, Omaha: University of Nebraska Medical Center, pp. 167-180.
  • HOLLAND, A. (1980): Communicative Abilities in Daily Living: A test of functional communication for adults, Baltimore: University Park Press.
  • HOLLAND, A. (1991): “Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia”, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, pp. 197-211.
  • JOHNSON, M. L. et al. (2014): “An Enhanced Protocol for Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy II: A Case Series”, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, pp. 60-72.
  • KAGAN, A. (1998): “Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversational partners”, Aphasiology, 12, pp. 816-830.
  • KAGAN, A. et al. (2001): “Training volunteers as conversation partners using Supported conversation for adults with aphasia (SCA): A controlled study”, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, pp. 624–638.
  • MCNEIL, M. R. et al. (1995): “Behavioral and pharmacological treatment of lexical-semantic deficits in a single patient with primary progressive aphasia”, American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 4, pp. 76-87.
  • PENN, C. et al. (2010): “Executive function and conversational strategies in bilingual aphasia”, Aphasiology, 24 (2), pp. 288-308.
  • PERKINS, M. (2000): “The scope of pragmatic disability. A cognitive approach”, Müller, N. (ed): Pragmatics in Speech and Language Pathology: Studies in Clinical Applications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 6-28.
  • ROSE, M. (2006): “The utility of arm and hand gestures in the treatment of aphasia”, Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 8, pp. 92-109.
  • ROSE, M. & DOUGLAS, J. (2003): “Limb apraxia, pantomime, and lexical gesture in aphasic speakers: preliminary findings”, Aphasiology, 17, pp. 453-464.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. y HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2014): MetAphAs. Protocolo de Exploración de Habilidades Metalingüísticas en la Afasia, Valencia: NauLlibres.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2017): “Anomia rehabilitation viewed from a pragmatic-functional paradigm. A case study”, Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 7, pp. 47-70.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2018a): MetAphAs. Metalanguage in Aphasia Assessment, Valencia: NauLlibres (Libro electrónico en Google books).
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2018b): “Aphasiarehabilitationfrom a pragmatic-functionalparadigm. A comparative study of two patients with different performance profiles in natural metalinguistic tasks”, Aphasiology, 32 (S1), pp. 50-51.
  • ROSELL-CLARI, V. & VALLES-GONZÁLEZ, B. (2016): “Theory of Mind (ToM) and language: stimulating metalinguistic skills in people with dementia”, RevistaCoDAS, 28, pp. 252-260.
  • SALTER, K. L. et al. (2007): “Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation”, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86, pp. 1007-1012.
  • SANDT-KOENDERMAN M. E., MEULEN I. & RIBBERS G. M. (2012): “Aphasia rehabilitation: more than treating the language disorder”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (1), pp. 1-3.
  • SARNO, M. T. (1969): The Functional Communication Profile: Manual of directions, New York: Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. SIMMONS-MACKIE, N. et al. (2010): “Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: A Systematic Review”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, pp. 1814-1837.
  • SPENCER, K. A. et al. (2000): “Examining the facilitative effects of rhyme in a patient with output lexical damage”, Aphasiology, 14, pp. 567-584.
  • TOMASELLO, M. (2003): Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978): Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • WILKINSON, R. & WIELAERT, S. (2012): “Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: Can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation?”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (1), pp. 70-76.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet