Análisis estructural de las representaciones sociales del adicto a sustancias tóxicas

  1. Javier Pons Diez
  2. David Llopls Goig
  3. Enrique Berjano Peirats
  4. Sacramento Pinaza Hernandis
Revista:
Informació psicològica

ISSN: 0214-347X

Año de publicación: 1996

Número: 61

Páginas: 55-63

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Informació psicològica

Resumen

The main goal of this research is to make an analysis of the image in different types of addicts to institucionalized and non- institucionalized substances, depending on three structural variables: gender, age and level of studies. For that purpose, were selected 222 subjects of both genders and older than fifteen, who were applied the IMAGO-93 questionnaire. This questionnaire is made from ten sentences alluding to different conceptions of the drug consumer, and based on four different dimensions rationally stablished: refuse, Hedonism, Pathology and Psychological problems. Each one of these senytences was presenred to the opinion of the subjects by the Likert method with five steps: from totally agreement to totally disagreement. This scale of ten items was applied to different possibilities of consume related to five different types o f substances: tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, stimulants and heroine. Different ANOVAS were used, using as dependent variables the punctuation from each one of the rational factors for each one of the different type of consumers; and as non- dependent variables, the categories stablished for the three structural variables used. The results are also commented.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bandura,A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A Social CognitiveTheory. Nueva Jersey: PrenticeHall.
  • Berjano, E.. García, F.. Gracia, E. y Musitu. G. (1992). Autoconcepto ,personalidad y consumo de drogas entre alumnos en proceso de escolarización normalizada y alumnos de educación especial. Valencia: Edicions Alfons el Magnánim.
  • Ellis. A.. Mclnerney, J.F. , DiGiuseppe, R. yYeager, R.J. (1988). Rational-emotive therapy with alcoholics and substance abusers.NuevaYork: Pergamon.
  • Musitu. G., Castillo, R. y García, F. (1 989). Actitudes, información y hábitos de consumo de tabaco en profesionales de la salud y de la docencia en la Comunidad Valenciana. Valencia: Conselleriade Sanitat i Consumo
  • Elejabarrieta. F. (1991). Las representaciones sociales. En:A. Echebarría (Ed.). Psicología Social Sociocognitiva. Bilbao: DDB.
  • Farr,R. (1987).Social representations: A French tradition of research.Journal for theTheory of Social Behaviour. 17, 343-369.
  • Jodelet,D. (1989). Représentations sociales: Un domaine en expansiono En D.jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales. París:PUF.
  • Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of Social Representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18 (3), 211 -250.
  • Moscovici. S. y Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: From «naive» to the «arnateur scientist.En M.Hewstone (Ed.),Attribution theory. Social and functional explanations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Páez, D.. San Juan. c.. Romo, 1. y Vergara,A. (1991). Sida. Imagen y Prevención. Madrid: Fundamentos.