Introspección reflexiva del estudiante sobre su experiencia en másteres internacionales

  1. Gallarza, Martina G.
  2. Fayos Gardó, Teresa
  3. Fontana Vinat, María
  4. Derqui Zaragozá, Belén
Journal:
@tic. revista d'innovació educativa

ISSN: 1989-3477

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Autumn (July-December 2018)

Issue: 21

Pages: 57-66

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7203/ATTIC.21.13299 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: @tic. revista d'innovació educativa

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Value co-creation is becoming a mainstream in higher education, as a progress within the ‘Students as Customer’ approach. Furthermore, the development of qualitative studies through reflective methods from students can help instructors and managers. The aim of this research is to explore with the aid of a CAQDAS, 30 students’ reflective statements in two master programs. Findings are presented in terms of value dimensions: functional, emotional and social, and in terms of positive (benefits) and negative (cost) aspects of the experience. The usefulness of introspective methodologies from students is shown in the evaluation of the multidimensional and intercultural educational experience.

Bibliographic References

  • Afshar, H.S. & Rahimi, M. (2016). Reflective thinking, emotional intelligence, and speaking ability of EFL learners: Is there a relation? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.005
  • Alfaro, I. J., Boullosa, A. P., Andreu‐Besó, J. V., De Lamo, J., Sobrado, L., Sanz, R. & Arias, J. M. (2009). Student opinion of the information policies of four Spanish universities with regard to Erasmus and other international programmes. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3-4), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720903355554
  • Bain, K. (2006). Lo que hacen los mejores profesores de universidad. Universitat de València.
  • Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958-1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
  • Ciges, A. S. (2012). La formación intercultural del profesorado: estrategias para un proceso de investigación-acción. Educatio Siglo XXI, 30(1), 113-132.
  • Dahl, A. J., Peltier, J. W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2018). Critical Thinking and Reflective Learning in the Marketing Education Literature: A Historical Perspective and Future Research Needs. Journal of Marketing Education, DOI: 0273475317752452
  • De La Fuente Mella, H., Marzo Navarro, M., Riquelme, R., & Jesús, M. (2010). Análisis de la satisfacción universitaria en la Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad de Talca. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 18(3), 350-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052010000300009
  • Denzin, N. K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative research, 1(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100102
  • Deshpandé, R. (1983). Paradigms Lost: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 47 (Fall) 101-110.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: MacMillan.
  • Dollinger, M. Lodge, J. & Coate, H. (2018) Co-creation in higher education: towards a conceptual model Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
  • Fan, W., Cheung, F.M., Leong, F.T.L. & Cheung, S.F. (2012). Personality Traits, Vocational Interests, and Career Exploration: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between American and Hong Kong. Students Journal of Career Assessment, 20 (1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711417167
  • Finney, T.G. & Finney, Z. (2010). Are students their universities’customers? An exploratory study. Education+Training, 52(4), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011050954
  • Gal, I. & Ograjenšek, I. (2010). Qualitative Research in the Service of Understanding Learners and Users of Statistics. International Statistical Review, 78 (2), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00104.x
  • Gallarza, M.G.; Seric, M. & Cuadrado, M. (2017). Trading off benefits and costs in higher education: A qualitative research with international incoming students The International Journal of Management Education, 15 (3), 456-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.08.001
  • Gibbs, P. (2007). Marketing and education—A clash or a synergy in time? Journal of business research, 60(9), 1000-1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.025
  • Gummesson, E. (2005). Qualitative Research in Marketing. Road-Map for a Wilderness of Complexity and Unpredictability. European Journal of Marketing, 39 (3/4), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510581791
  • Guolla, M. (1999). Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 7(3), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501843
  • Harrison, R. L., & Reilly, T. M. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751111099300
  • Haug, G. (2016). La internacionalización de la educación superior: más allá de la movilidad europea. La cuestión universitaria, (6), 20-29.
  • Holbrook, M.B. (1999). Introduction to Consumer Value and Conclusions. In M.B. Holbrook (ed.). Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. London: Routledge, pp. 1-28 & 183-197.
  • Jackling, B., Natoli, R., Siddique, S., & Sciulli, N. (2015). Student attitudes to blogs: a case study of reflective and collaborative learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 542-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.931926
  • Kaur, A., & Noman, N. (2015). Exploring Classroom Practices in Collectivist Cultures Through the Lens of Hofstede’s Model. The Qualitative Report, 20 (11), 1794-1811.
  • Kelly, P. (2009). Group work and multicultural management education. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 20(1), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930802671273
  • Klein, S., Benjamin, R., Shavelson, R. & Bolus, R. (2007). The collegiate learning assessment: Facts and fantasies. Evaluation Review 31(5), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X07303318
  • Klenowski, V. & Lunt, I. (2008). Enhancing learning at doctoral level through the use of reflection? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292795
  • Leclercq, T., Hammedi, W. & Poncin, I. (2016). Ten years of value cocreation: An integrative review. Recherche et Applications Marketing, 31(3), 26-60.
  • Ledden, L., Kalafatis, S.P. & Samouel, P. (2007). The Relationship between Personal Values and Perceived Value of Education. Journal of Business Research, 60, 965–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.021
  • Lee, H.J., Lee, J., Makara, K.A., Fishman, B.J., & Hong, Y-I1. (2015). Does higher education foster critical and creative learners? An exploration of two universities in South Korea and the USA. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.892477
  • Mena-Marcos, J., García-Rodríguez, M., & Tillema, H. (2013). Student teacher reflective writing: What does it reveal? European Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.713933
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  • Mitchell, E. (2013). Reflective course construction: An analysis of student feedback and its role in curricular design. Education for Information, 30 (3-4), 149-166. DOI: 10.3233/EFI-130942
  • Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25 (2), 37-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redeen.2016.05.001
  • Moore, P., & Hampton, G. (2015). ‘It’s a bit of a generalisation, but…’: participant perspectives on intercultural group assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 390-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.919437
  • Moya, J. L. M., Borrasca, B. J., & Muñoz, F. I. (2010). La enseñanza reflexiva en la educación superior. Cuadernos de docencia universitaria, 17.
  • Nevid, J.S. & Sta. Maria, N.L. (1999). Multicultural issues in qualitative research. Psychology & Marketing, 16(4), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/
  • O’Shaughnessy, J. & Holbrook, M.B. (1988). Understanding Consumer Behavior: The Linguistic Turn in Marketing Research. Journal of the Market Research Society, 30(2), 197-223.
  • O´Shaughnessy, J. (2009). Interpretation in Social Life, Social Science, and Marketing. Nueva York, USA: Routledge.
  • Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research Evaluation Methods (3rd ed). California: Sage Publications.
  • Prahalad, C.K. & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(3), 5–14.
  • Rafferty, P. D. (2013). Group work experiences: Domestic MBA student experiences and outcomes when working with international students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(6), 737-749.
  • Rienties, B., Luchoomun, D. & Tempelaar, D. (2014). Academic and social integration of Master students: a cross-institutional comparison between Dutch and international students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(2), 130-141.
  • Rivza, B. & Teichler, U. (2007). The changing role of student mobility. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 457-475.
  • Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I. & Gross, B.L. (1991). Beyond semiotics and hermeneutics: Discourse analysis as a way to interpret consumers' discourses and experiences. Qualitative Market Research, 11(2), 177-191.
  • Sinkovics, R. & Alfoldi, E. (2012). Progressive Focusing and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. The Enabling Role of Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS). Management International Review, (52), 817-845. DOI: 10.1007/s11575-012-0140-5
  • Sitz, L. (2008). Beyond semiotics and hermeneutics: Discourse analysis as a way to interpret consumers' discourses and experiences. Qualitative Market Research: an international journal, 11(2), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750810864431
  • Smith, S. (2016). (Re)Counting Meaningful Learning Experiences: Using Student-Created Reflective Videos to Make Invisible Learning Visible During PBL Experiences. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1). DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1541
  • Strauss, P., U-Mackey, A. & Crothers, C. (2014). They drag my marks down!’ - challenges faced by lecturers in the allocation of marks for multicultural group projects. Intercultural Education, 25(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.905361
  • Swensson, G. & Wood, G. (2007). Are university students really customers. When illusion may lead to delusion for all. Internacional Journal of Educational Management, 21(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710716795
  • Sweeney, J. & Soutar, G. (2001). Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale. Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 203-207.
  • Tian, M. & Lowe, J. (2013). The role of feedback in cross-cultural learning: a case study of Chinese taught postgraduate students in a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 580-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.670196
  • Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2014). Service-Dominant Logic Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
  • Warwick, P. (2014). The international business of higher education–A managerial perspective on the internationalisation of UK universities. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(2), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2014.02.003
  • Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-end Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.