De Piaget a Kohlbergutilitat i vigència de l'ús de dilemes morals amb l'alumnat universitari
- Pérez Pérez, Cruz
- García García, Fran J.
- Zayas Latorre, Belen
ISSN: 1135-1268
Year of publication: 2017
Issue Title: Homenatge a L. Kohlberg i D. Kahneman
Volume: 18
Issue: 2
Pages: 163-181
Type: Article
More publications in: Anuari de psicologia de la Societat Valenciana de Psicologia
Abstract
When Lawrence Kohlberg’s 90th birthday is over, it is important to remember the relevance of his contributions to people’s moral-cognitive development. However, the progress of this theory would not have been possible without the previous studies of Jean Piaget on the process of construction of autonomous morality in the child. The work of both authors has had great pedagogical effects on a just and autonomous thought constitution. One of the techniques used by Kohlberg for people to progress in the stages of moral development defined by him is moral dilemma. We consider this technique continues being valid nowadays, as we have checked with university students. Nonetheless, we have seen the hypothetical dilemmas used by Kohlberg have become obsolete, changing the value system of our students and our social context where we live. Thus, we have had to create new dilemmas adapted to actuality. These quandaries have been experimented with university students to ensure their validity and effectiveness for meeting the objectives. These new dilemmas are a suitable material for working with students in order to they learn the technique and be able to advance to higher levels of moral-cognitive development.
Bibliographic References
- Beltrán, J. (1987). La Psicología de la Educación como Ciencia. Madrid: Eudema.
- Escámez, J. (1996). «Teorías contemporáneas sobre educación moral». En Cortina, A.; Escámez, J. i Pérez-Delgado, E., Un mundo de valores (pp. 39-49). València: Generalitat Valenciana.
- Habermas, J. (1985). Conciencia moral y acción comunicativa. Barcelona: Península.
- Hersh, R. H.; Paolitto, D. P. i Reimer, J. (1979). El crecimiento moral. De Piaget a Kohlberg. Madrid: Narcea.
- Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays of moral development: the psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row Publishers.
- Kohlberg, L. (1992). Psicología del desarrollo moral. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
- Kohlberg, L.; Power, F. C. i Higgins, A. (eds.) (1997). La educación moral según Lawrence Kohlberg. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
- Martí-Vilar, M.; Samper, P. i Díaz, I. (1997) «L’impacte de L. Kohlberg en la Psicologia comtemporània». Anuari de Psicologia, 4(1), pp. 24-39.
- Medina, J. R. (2003). «Las insuficiencias del formalismo». Anuario Filosófico, 36(1), pp. 365-407.
- Miraño, R.; Uruburu, A.; Moreno-Romero, A. i Pérez-López, D. (2017). «Strategies for Teaching Professional Ethics to IT Engineering Degree Students and Evaluating the Result». Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), pp. 263-286. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9746-x.
- Olivera, A.; Villacampa, J. i Sarmiento, L. F. (2015). «Quan allò moral és emocional: aproximació dimensional a la naturalesa afectiva dels dilemes morals». Anuari de Psicologia, 16(1), pp. 127-137.
- Peters, R. S. (1984). Desarrollo moral y educación moral. Mèxic: FCE. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Piaget, J. (1960). La nueva educación moral. Buenos Aires: Losada.
- Puig, J. M. i Martínez, M. (1989). Educación moral y democracia. Barcelona: Laertes.
- Rubio Carrecedo, J. (1992). Ética constructiva y autonomía personal. Madrid: Técnos.