How do Scrabble players encode letter position during reading?

  1. Manuel Perea 1
  2. Ana Marcet 1
  3. Pablo Gómez 2
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 DePaul University
    info

    DePaul University

    Chicago, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/04xtx5t16

Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 28

Número: 1

Páginas: 7-12

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: en experimentos con lectores adultos, las pseudopalabras creadas por transposición de letras (v.g., CHOLOCATE) se confunden frecuentemente con su palabra base. Por ejemplo, en tareas de decisión léxica (“¿es el estímulo una palabra?”), los tiempos de respuesta son mayores y con mayor porcentaje de errores para CHOLOCATE que para su control ortográfico CHOTONATE (es decir, un efecto de transposición de letras). Método: en el presente experimento examinamos los procesos de codificación de la posición de las letras en individuos particularmente expertos en el procesamiento ortográfico-léxico: jugadores de Scrabble de competición. Para ello, se realizó un experimento de decisión léxica con dos tipos de pseudopalabras (vía transposición de letras [CHOLOCATE] vs. vía sustitución de letras [CHOTONATE]). Resultados: si bien los jugadores expertos de Scrabble muestran un efecto de transposición de letras, la magnitud del efecto es mucho menor que en estudiantes universitarios no entrenados a Scrabble, en particular para los datos de precisión. Conclusiones: en los modelos de reconocimiento visual de palabras, la flexibilidad en la codificación de la posición de las letras en palabras debe ser modulada por la destreza en el procesamiento ortográfico-léxico.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264.
  • Adelman, J. S. (2011). Letters in time and retinotopic space. Psychological Review, 118, 570-582.
  • Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 152-163.
  • Bilalić, M., Langner, R., Erb, M., & Grodd, W. (2010). Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: A study with chess experts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 728-742.
  • Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 90-98.
  • Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2007). ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? Neuroscience Letters, 419, 219-224.
  • Castles, A., Davis, C., & Forster, K. I. (2003). Word recognition development in children: Insights from masked-priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 345-360). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
  • Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 165-182.
  • Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
  • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identifi cation. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
  • Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56, 384-398.
  • Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81-103.
  • Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116-124.
  • Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263-279.
  • Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
  • Grainger, J., & Jacobs, M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
  • Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1-23). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Gu, J., & Li, X. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 272-281.
  • Halpern, D. F., & Wai, J. (2007). The world of competitive Scrabble: Novice and expert differences in visuopatial and verbal abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 79-94.
  • Hargreaves, I. S., Pexman, P. M., Zdrazilova, L., & Sargious, P. (2012). How a hobby can shape cognition: Visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1-7.
  • Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
  • Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254-271.
  • Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 418-422.
  • Perea, M., & Estévez, A. (2008). Transposed-letter similarity effects in naming pseudowords: Evidence from children and adults. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 33-46.
  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
  • Perea, M., & Pérez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88.
  • Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375-380.
  • Perea, M., Winskel, H., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai. Experimental Psychology, 59, 68-73.
  • Protzner, A. B., Hargreaves, I. S., Campbell, J. A., Myers-Stewart, K., van Hees, S., Goodyear, B. G., ... & Pexman, P. M. (2015). This is your brain on Scrabble: Neural correlates of visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players as measured during task and resting-state. Cortex. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.015
  • Ratcliff, R., Gómez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
  • Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
  • Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
  • Taft, M., & Van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
  • Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141-156.
  • Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet