Innovaciones y prácticas organizativas como determinantes de la competitividad

Bibliographische Referenzen

• ABRUNHOSA, A. y MOURA E SÁ, P. (2008): «Are TQM principles supporting innovation in the Portuguese footwear industry?», Technovation, vol. 28, págs. 208-221.
• AGUS, A.; KRISHNAN, S.K.; LATIFAH, S. y KADIR, S. (2000): «The struc- tural impact of total quality management on financial performance relative to competitors through customer satisfaction: A study of Malaysian manufacturing companies», Total Quality Mana gement, vol. 11, nº 4-6, págs. 808-819.
• ARAGÓN-CORREA, J.A.; GARCÍA-MORALES, V.J. y CORDÓNPOZO, E. (2007): «Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain», Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 36, nº 3, págs. 349-359.
• BARON, R.M. y KENNY, D.A. (1986): “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 61, nº 6, págs. 1173-1182.
• BARROW, J.W., (1993): «Does total quality management equal organizational learning?», Quality Progress, vol. 26, nº 7, págs. 39-44.
• BEER, M. (2003): «Why Total Quality Management Programs Do Not Persist: The Role of Management Quality and Implications for Leading a TQM Transformation», Decision Sciences, vol. 34, nº 4, págs. 623-642.
• BENNER, M. J. y TUSHMAN, M. L. (2003): «Exploitation, exploration and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 28, nº 2, p. 238-256.
• BENNIS, W. y NANUS, B. (1985): «Organisational learning: the management of the collective self», New Management, vol. 3, nº. 1, págs. 7-13.
• BONTIS, N.; CROSSAN, M.M. y HULLAND, J. (2002): «Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows», Journal of Management Studies, vol. 39, págs. 437-469.
• BRENNAN, L. (2001): «Total quality management in a research and development environment», Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 12, nº 2, págs. 94-102.
• BROWN, K.; SCHMIED, H. y TARONDEAU, J-C. (2002): «Success factors in R&D: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature and derived implications for design management», Design Management Journal, vol. 2, págs. 72-105.
• CAMISÓN, C.; BORONAT, B.; VILLAR, A. y PUIG, A. (2009): «Sis temas de gestión de la calidad y desempeño: importancia de las prácticas de gestión del conocimiento y de I+D», Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 18, nº 1, págs. 123-134.
• CHOO, A. S.; LINDERMAN, K .W. y SCHROEDER, R. G. (2007): «Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management», Journal of Operations Manage ment, vol. 25, págs. 918-931.
• CONTI, T. (1993): Building Total Quality: A Guide for Mana gement. Chapman & Hold, London.
• DALE, B. G. (1997): «Characteristics of organizations not committed to Total Quality Management», Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 21, págs. 377-384
• DAMANPOUR, F. (1987): «The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors», Journal of Management, vol. 13, nº 4, págs. 675-688.
• DAMANPOUR, F. (1991): «Organizational innovation: A metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators», Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, págs. 555-590
• DEAN, J.W. y BOWEN, D. (1994): «Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory deve lopment», Academy of Management Review, vol. 19, págs. 392-418.
• DEMING, E.W. (1982). Out of crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. DEMIRBAG, M.; KOH, L.; TATOGLU, E. y ZAIM, S. (2006a): «TQM and market orientation’s impact on SEMs’ performance», Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 106, nº 8, págs. 1206-1228.
• DEMIRBAG, M.; TATOGLU, E.; TEKINKUS, M. y ZAIM, S. (2006b): «An analysis of the relationship between TQM implementation and organizational performance. Evidence from Turkish SMEs», Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 17, nº 6, págs. 829-847.
• DOSI, G. (1982): «Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change», Research Policy, vol. 11, págs. 147-162.
• DOSI, G. (1988): «Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation», Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26, págs. 1120-1171.
• DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, C.; NELSON, R.R.; SILVERBERG, G. y SOETE, L. (eds., 1988): Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, London.
• EIDT, C.M. Jr. (1992): «Applying quality to R&D means ‘learn-asyou-go’», Research Technology Management, vol. 35, nº 4, págs. 24-31.
• EISENHARDT, K.M. y MARTIN, J.A. (2000): «Dynamic Ccpabilities: What are they?», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, nº 10-11, págs. 1105-1121.
• FEIGENBAUM, A.V. (1991): Total quality control. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• FENG, J.; PRAJOGO, D.; TAN, K.C. y SOHAL; S. (2006): «The impact of TQM practices on performance. A comparative study between Australian and Singaporean organizations», European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 9, nº 3, págs. 269-278.
• FICHMAN, R.G. y KEMERER, C.F. (1997): «The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Pers pective», Management Science, vol. 43, nº 10, págs. 1345-1363.
• FIOL, C.M. y LYLES, M.A. (1985): «Organisational learning», Academy of Management Review, vol. 10, nº 4, págs. 803-813.
• FLYNN, B.B. (1994): «The Relationship between Quality Management Practices, Infrastructure and Fast Product Innovation», Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, vol. 1, nº 1, págs. 48-64.
• FLYNN, B.B.; SCHROEDER, R.G y SAKAKIBARA, S. (1994): «A Framework for Quality Management Research and an Associated Measurement Instrument», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 11, nº 4, págs. 339-366.
• FORD, W. (1991): «The learning enterprise: Integrating total quality management and workplace reform and renewal», Pro ceedings of the TQMI Conference, Sydney, págs. 56-62.
• GALENDE, J. (2006): «Analysis of technological innovation from business economics and management», Technovation, vol. 26, págs. 300-311.
• GALENDE, J. y SUÁREZ, I. (1998): «Los factores determinantes de las inversiones empresariales en I+D», Economía Industrial, 319, págs. 63-76.
• GARVIN, D.A., (1993): «Building a learning organisation», Har vard Businesss Review, vol. 71, nº 4, págs. 78-91
• HACKMAN, J.R. y WAGEMAN, R. (1995): «Total Quality Mana gement: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues», Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 40, nº 2, págs. 309-342.
• HARARI, O. (1993): «Ten reason why TQM doesn’t work», Management Review, vol. 82, nº 1, págs. 33-38.
• HELFAT, C.E. (1997): «Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, nº 5, págs. 339-360.
• HENDRICKS, K. y SINGHAL, V. (2001): «Firm characteristics, total quality management, and financial performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 19, págs. 269-285.
• HODGETTS, R.M.; LUTHANS, F y LEE, S. M. (1994): «New Paradigm Organizations: From Total Quality to Learning to World-Class», Organizational Dynamics, Winter, vol. 22, nº 3, págs. 4-19.
• HSU, C.C. y PEREIRA, A. (2008): «Internationalization and performance: The moderating effects of organizational learning», Omega, vol. 36, nº 2, págs. 188-205.
• IMAI, M. (1986): Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. Random House, New York.
• JEREZ-GÓMEZ, P.; CÉSPEDES-LORENTE, J. y VALLE-CABRERA, R. (2005): «Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement», Journal of Business Research, vol. 58, págs. 715-725.
• JURAN, J. M. (1986): «The Quality Trilogy: A Universal Approach to Managing for Quality», Quality Progress, August, págs. 19-24.
• JURAN, J. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality. Free Press, New York.
• KHANDEKAR, A. y SHARMA, A. (2006): «Organizational learning and performance. Understanding Indian scenario in present global context», Education + Training, vol. 48, nº 8-9, págs. 682-692.
• KANJI, G. K. (1996): «Can total quality management help innovation?», Total Quality Management, vol. 7, nº 1, págs. 3-9.
• KESKIN, H. (2006): «Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs. An extended model», European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 9, nº 4, págs. 396-417.
• LEE, H. y CHOI, B. (2003): «Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination», Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 20, nº 1, págs. 179-228.
• LINDERMAN, K.; SCHROEDER, R.G.; ZAHEER, S.; LIEDTKE, C. y CHOO, A. S. (2004): «Integrating quality management practices with knowledge creation processes», Journal of Operations Mana gement, vol. 22, págs. 589-607.
• LOVE, P. E.D.; LI, H.; IRANI, Z. y Faniran, O. (2000): «Total quality management and the learning organization: a dialogue for change in construction», Construction Management and Eco nomics, vol. 18, págs. 321-331.
• LOVE, J. H. y MANSURY, M. A. (2008): «External Linkages, R&D and Innovation Performance in US Business Services», Industry and Innovation, vol. 14, nº 5, págs. 477-496.
• LUNDVALL, B-A. y NIELSEN, P. (2007): «Knowledge management and innovation performance», International Journal of Manpower, vol. 28, nº 3-4, págs. 207-223.
• MAHONEY, J.T. y PANDIAN, J.R. (1992): «The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, nº 5, págs. 363-380.
• MARTÍNEZ-LORENETE, A.; DEWHURST, F. y DALE, B. (1999): «TQM and business innovation», European Journal of Innovation Mana gement, vol. 2, nº 1, págs. 12-19.
• MASCARENHAS, B.; BAVEJA, A. y JAMIL, M. (1998): «Dynamics of Core Competencies in Leading Multinational Companies», California Management Review, vol. 40, nº 4, págs. 117-132.
• McADAM, R.; ARMSTRONG, G. y KELLY, B. (1998): «Investigation of the relationship between total quality and innovations; a research study involving small organisations», European Journal of Inno vation Management, vol. 1, nº 3, págs. 139-147.
• MENKE, M. M. (1994): «Imporving R&D decisions and execution», Research Technology Management, vol. 37, nº 5, págs. 25- 32.
• MILLER, G. (1994): «Quality in research: an empirical study», Technovation, vol. 14, nº 6, págs. 381-394.
• MURRAY, P. y CHAPMAN, R. (2003): «From continuous improvement to organizational learning: developmental theory», The Learning Organization, vol. 10, nº 5, págs. 272-282.
• NELSON, R.R. (1991): «Why do firms differ and how does industry matter?», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12 (special issue winter), págs. 61-74.
• NELSON, R.R. (1995): «Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change», Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 33 (March), págs. 48-90.
• NELSON, R.R. y WINTER, S. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• PERDOMO-ORTIZ, J.; GONZÁLEZ-BENITO, J. y GALENDE, J. (2009): «The intervening effect of business innovation capability on the relationship between Total Quality Management and technological innovation», International Journal of Production Research, vol. 47, nº 18, págs. 5087-5107.
• PÉREZ-LÓPEZ, S.; MONTES-PEÓN, J. M. y VÁZQUEZ-ORDÁS, C. J. (2005): «Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance», The Learning Organization, vol. 12, nº 3, págs. 227-245.
• PETRONI, G.; DORMIO, A. I.; NOSELLA, A. y VERBANO, C. (2003): «The TQM trajectories in research and development: two Italian cases», European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 6, nº 4, págs. 239-252.
• PRAJOGO, D. y AHMED, P. (2006): «Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance», R&D Management, vol. 36, nº 5, págs. 499-515.
• PRAJOGO, D. y SOHAL, A. (2001): «TQM and innovation: a literature review and research framework», Technovation, vol. 21, págs. 539-559.
• PRAJOGO, D. y SOHAL, A. (2003): «The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance. An empirical examination», The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 20, nº 8-9, págs. 901-918.
• PRAJOGO, D. y SOHAL, A. (2004): «The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance – an empirical examination», Technovation, vol. 24, págs. 443-445.
• PRAJOGO, D.I. y SOHAL, A.S., (2006): «The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation», Omega, vol. 34, nº 3, págs. 296-312.
• POOL, S.W., (2000): «The learning organization: Motivating employees by integrating TQM philosophy in a supportive organizational culture», Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 21, nº 8, págs. 373-378.
• RUIZ-MORENO, A.; GARCÍA-MORALES, V. y LLORÉNS-MONTES, F. J. (2005): «Learning during the quality management process. Antecedents and effects in service firms», Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 105, nº 8, págs. 1001-1021.
• SANDELANDS, E. (1994): «Total Quality Equals Total Research», Work Study, vol. 43, nº 6, págs. 11-12.
• SANTOS M.L. y ÁLVAREZ, L.I. (2008): «Efectos de la gestión de calidad total en la transformación en la innovación tecnológica y administrativa», Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Em presa, nº 37, diciembre, págs. 33-65.
• SAVOLAINEN, T. y HAIKONEN, A. (2007): «Dynamics of organizational learning and continuos improvement in six sigma implementation», The TQM Magazine, vol. 9, nº 1, págs. 6-17.
• SINGH, P. y SMITH, A. (2004): «Relationship between TQM and innovation: an empirical study», Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 15, nº 5, págs. 394-401.
• SITKIN, S.B.; SUTCLIFFE, K.M. y SCHROEDER, R.G. (1994): «Dis tinguising control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective», Academy of Management Journal, vol. 19, nº 3, págs. 537-564.
• SOHAL, A. y MORRISON, M. (1995): «Is there a link between total quality management and learning organizations?», The TQM Magazine, vol. 7, nº 3, págs. 41-44.
• SOUSA, R. y VOSS, C.A. (2002): «Quality management re-visited: A reflective review and agenda for future research», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 20, nº 1, págs. 91-109.
• TAYLOR, R. y PEARSON, A. (1994): «Total Quality Management in Research and Development», The TQM Magazine, vol. 6, nº 1, págs. 26-34.
• TEECE, D.J. (1986): «Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy», Research Policy, vol. 15, nª 6, págs. 285-305.
• TEECE, D.J. y PISANO, G. (1998): «The dynamic capabilities of the firm: An introduction», en Dosi, G.; Teece, D.J.; Chytry, J. (eds.): Technology, organization, and competitiveness. Perspectives on industrial and corporate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, págs. 193-212.
• TEECE, D.J.; PISANO, G.P. y SHUEN, A. (1990): «Firm capabilities, resources, and the concept of strategy», Working Paper, Berkeley, University of California.
• TEECE, D.J.; PISANO, G. y SHUEN, A. (1997): «Dynamic capabilities and strategic management», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, nº 7, págs. 509-533.
• TERZIOVSKI, M.; HOWEL, A.; SOHAL, A. y MORRISON, M. (2000): «Establishing mutual dependence between TQM and the learning organization: a multiple case study analysis», The Learning Organization. Bradford, vol. 7, nº 1, págs. 23-31.
• TERZIOVSKI, M. y SAMSON, D. (1999): «The link between total quality management practice and organisational performance», International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 16, nº 3, págs. 226 237
• THOMPSON, V.A. (1965): «Bureaucracy and innovation», Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 5, June, págs. 1-20.
• UN, C.A. y CUERVO-CAZURRA, A. (2004): «Strategies for knowledge creation in firms», British Journal of Management, vol. 15, supplement 1, págs. 27-41.
• WANG, C. L. y AHMED, P. K. (2003): «Organisational learning: a critical review», The Learning Organization, vol. 10, nº 1, págs. 8-17.
• WINTER, S.G. (1995): «Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines and replication», en Montgomery, C.A. (ed.): Resourcebased and evolutionary theories of the Firm: Toward a Synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, págs. 147-178.
• YAM, R.C.M. y GUAN, J.C.; PUN, K.F. y TANG, E.P.Y. (2004): «An audit of technological innovation capabiltiies in Chinese firms: Some empirical findings in Beijing, China», Research Policy, vol. 33, págs. 1123-1140.
• YORK, K.M. y MIREE, C.E. (2004): «Causation or Covariation: An empirical Re-Examination of the Link Between TQM and Financial Performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 22, nº 3, págs. 291-311.
• ZU, X., FREDENDALL, L.D. y DOUGLAS, T.J., (2008): «The evolving theory of quality management: The role of six sigma», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 26, págs. 630-650.
• ZWETSLOOT, G. (2001): «The management of innovation by frontrunner companies in environmental management and health and safety», Environmental Management and Health, vol. 12, nº 2, págs. 207–214.