Gestión de equipos virtuales en las organizaciones laboralesalgunas aportaciones desde la investigación

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34(5), 575-618.
• Axtell, C.M.; Fleck,S.J. y Turner, N. (2004). Virtual teams: collaborating across distance. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 19; 205-248.
• Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Bell, B. S., y Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27 (1), 14- 49.
• Beranek, P. M., & Martz, B. (2005). Making virtual teams more effective: improving relational links. Team Performance Management, 11(5/6), 200-213.
• Beranek, P.M. (2005). A Comparison of Relational and Trust Training Techniques for Virtual Team Communication; How Much Training is Enough?. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii Interrantinal Conference on System Sciences, 1-10.
• Bergiel, J.B., Bergiel, E.B. y Balsmeier, P.W. (2008). Nature of virtual teams: a summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31, 99-110.
• Bjorn, P. y Ngwenyama, O. (2011). Technology Alignment: A New Area in Virtual Team Research. IEEE Transactions Professional Communication, 54, 1.
• Bordia, P. (1997). Face to Face versus Computer-Mediated Communicacion: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature. The Journal of Business Communication, 34, 1, 99-120.
• Burke, K. y Chidambaram, L. (1999). How Much Bandwidth is Enough? A longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 23, 557-580.
• Carlson, J.R. y Zmud, R.W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (2), 153-170.
• Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups. MIS Quarterly, June, 143-163.
• Cohen, S. G. y C. B. Gibson. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and framework. En C. B. Gibson y S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, 1–13. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Cramton, C. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 3, 346-371.
• Cuevas, H.M., Fiore, S.M., Salas, E. y Bowers, C.A. (2004). Virtual Teams as Sociotechnical Systems. En S. Godar & S. Ferris, Virtual and Collaborative Teams, pp. 1-19). New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.
• Curseu, P.L., Schalk, R. y Wessel, I. (2008). How do virtual teams process information?. A literature review and implications for management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 6, 628-652.
• Daft,R.L. & Lengel,R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32,(5), 554-71.
• DeSanctis, G. y M. S. Poole. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Science. 5(2) 121–147.
• DeSanctis, G., y Monge, P. R. (1999). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 693–703.
• Ebrahim, N.A., Ahmed, S. y Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual Teams: a literature Review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3, 3, 2653-2669.
• Geister, S., Konradt, U. y Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37: 459-489.
• Gibson, C. B., y Cohen, S. G. (2003). The last word: Conclusions and implications. En C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen, Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 403-421). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
• Gibson, C.B. (1999). Do they do what thety belive they can?. Group efficiency and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
• González-Navarro, P., Orengo, V. Zornoza, A., Ripoll, P. y Peiró, J.M. (2010). Group interaction styles in a virtual context: The effects on Group outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1472-1480.
• Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E. y Neale, M. A. (2003).Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27: 265-287.
• Guzzo, R.A., Yost, P.R., Campbell, R.J. y Shea, G.P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
• Hertel, G., Geister, S., y Konradt, U. (2005). “Managing virtual teams: A review ofcurrent empirical research.” Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Jhonson, M. D., y Jundt, D. K. (2005). Teams in organizations: From Input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., y Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29-64.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., y Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791-815.
• Jarvenpaa, S.L., Shaw, T.R. y Staples, D.S., (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15 (3), 250-267.
• Jones, G.,y George, J. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531-546.
• Kanawattanachai, P., y Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 187-213.
• Kozlowsky, S.W.J., y Ilgen, D.R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work Group and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 3, 77-124.
• Krebs, S.A., Hobman, E.V. and Bordia, P., (2006). Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity: Consequences for the development of trust. Small Group Research, 37, 6, 721-741.
• Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). The social contexts of computer-mediated communication. Hemmel Hampstead,UK: Harvester-Wheatshead.
• LePine, J.A., Piccolo, R.F., Jackson, C.L., Mathieu, J.E. y Saul, J.R. (2008). A Meta-Analysis of Teamwork Processes: Tests of a Multidimensional Model and Relationships with Team Effectiveness Criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273-307.
• Leung, K., y Peterson, M. (2011). Managing a globally distributed workforce: Social and interpersonal issues. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 771-805). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.
• Lin, C.; Standing, C. y Liu, Y. (2008). A model to develop effective virtual teams. Decision Support Systems, 45, 4, 1031-1045.
• Lipnack, J. y Stamps, J., (2000). Virtual teams: People working across boundaries with technology. New York: Wiley.
• Lira, E., Ripoll, P., Peiró, J.M. y González-Navarro, P. (2007). The roles of group potency and information and communication technologies in the relationship beween task conflict and team effectiveness: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2888-2903.
• Lira, E., Ripoll, P., Peiró, J.M. y Orengo, V. (2008). How do different types of intragroup conflict affect group potency in virtual compared with face-to-face teams?. A longitudinal study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27, 2, 107-114.
• Lira, E., Ripoll, P., Peiró, J.M. y Zornona, A. (2008). The Role of Informatin and Communication Technologies in the Relationship Between Group Effectiuveness and Group Potency. A Longitudinal Study. Small Group Research, 39, 6, 728-745.
• Lurey, J.S. y Raisinghani, M.S. (2001). An emprirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information and Management, 38, 523-544.
• Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E. y Zaccaro, S.J. (2001). A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 3, 356-376.
• Marrone, J.A. (2010). Team Boundary Spanning: A Multilevel Review of Past Research and Proposals for the Future. Journal of Management, 36, 4, 911-940.
• Martínez-Moreno, E., González-Navarro, P., Zornoza, A., y Ripoll, P. (2009). Relationship, task and process conflicts on team performance: the moderating role of communication media. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20 (3), 251-268.
• Martins,L.L.; Gilson, L.L. y Maynard, M.T. (2004). Virtual teams: what do we know and where do we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30,6, 805-835.
• Maruping, L.M. y Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A tasktechnology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (6), 975-990.
• Mathieu, J.; Maynard, M.T.; Rappm T. y Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into de future. Journal of Management, 34, 3, 410-476.
• Maznevski, M.L. y Chudoba, K.M. (2000), “Bridging space over time: global virtual-team dynamics and effectiveness”, Organization Science, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 473-92.
• Munkvold, B. E. y Zigurs, I. (2007) Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams. Information & Management, 44, 287–299.
• Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., Prieto, F. y Peiró, J.M. (2000). The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communications media. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 141-159.
• Pearce, C.L., Gallagher, C.A. y Ensley, M.D. (2002). Confidence at the grup level of analysis: a longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 115-119.
• Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V. Zornoza, A. y Lira, E. (2007). Team trust effects on group planning process in virtual teams. Presentado al XIIIth European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology. Estocolmo.
• Peñarroja, V.; Lira, E. M.; Ripoll, P.; y Zornoza, A. (2005). Efectos de la interacción entre el medio de comunicación y la presión temporal percibida sobre el rendimiento grupal y la satisfacción con los resultados en tareas de negociación. Revista de Psicología Social y Aplicada, 15 (3), 99-115.
• Piccoli, G., e Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365-395.
• Powell, A., Piccoli, G., e Ives, B. (2004). “Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research.” Advances in Information Systems, 35:1, 6-24.
• Priest, H.A., Stagl, K.C. Klein, C y Salas, E. (2005). Vir- tual Teams: Creating Context for Distributed Teamwork. En C. A. Bowers, E. Salas, and F. Jentsch (Eds.) Creating High-Tech Teams. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Rice, D. J., Davidson, B. D., Dannenhoffer, J. F. y Gay, G. K. (2007) Improving the Effectiveness of Virtual Teams by Adapting Team Processes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 567–594.
• Rico, R., Cohen, S. y Gil, F. (2006). Efectos de la interdependencia de tarea y la sincronía en las tecnologías de comunicación so bre el rendimiento de los equpos virtuales de trabajo. Psicothema, 18, 743-749.
• Ripoll, P., González-Navarro, P., Zornoza, A., Orengo, V. y Peiró, J.M. (2004). La influencia de los procesos de interacción grupal y el medio de comunicación sobre la eficacia de los grupos de trabajo. Revista latinoamericana de Psicología, 36 (2), 195-208..
• Rosen, B., Furst, S., y Blackburn, R. (2006). Training for virtual teams: and investigation of current practices and future needs. Human Resource Management, 45 (2), 229-247.
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., y Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-disciplinary view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
• Rousseau, V., Aubé, C. y Savoie, A., (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37 (5), 540-570.
• Saviki, V., Kelley, M. y Ammon, B. (2002). Effects of training on computer-mediated communication in single or mixed gender small task groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 257-269.
• Schiller,SZ. y Mindviwalla, M. (2007). Virtual team research: An analysis of Theory use and a framework for Theory Appropiation. Small group research, 38,12- 59.
• Siegel, J.; Dubrovsky, V.; Kiesler, S. & McGuire, T.W. (1986). Group Processes and Computer-Mediated Communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
• Vartianien, M. y Andriessen, J.H.E. (2008). Virtual Team-Working and Collaboration Technology. En Nick Chmiel (Ed.), An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology. A European Perspective, cap. 10, 209-233. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Walther, J. B., & Bunz, U. (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computermediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828-846.
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computermediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
• Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20: 473–501.
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43
• Walther, J.B. (1995). Relational Aspects of Computermediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time. Organizational Science, 6, 186-203.
• Warketin, M. y Beranek, P.M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Info Systems, 9, 271- 289
• Wilson, J.M., Strauss, S. y McEvily, B., 2006. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 99, 16-33.
• Zheng, J., Bos, N.D., Olson, J.S., y Olson, G.M. (2001). Trust without touch: jump-start trust with social chat. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems. Extended Abstracts, New York: ACM.
• Zornoza, A. Ripoll, P. y Peiró, J.M. (2002). Conflict Management in groups that work in two different communication contexts: FtF and CMC. Small Group Research, 33, 481-508.
• Zornoza, A. Orengo, V., Gosálvez, I. y González-Navarro, P. (2002). Teamwork in different communication contexts: A longitudinal study. Psychology in Spain, 6, 1, 41-55.
• Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., y Peñarroja, V. (2009). Trust and social capital in teams and organizations. Social Science Information, 48(2), 257-281.
• Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., Ripoll, P. y González-Navarro, P. (2003). The influence of Time on Socially Oriented Communication in Groups that Work in FtF and CMC. Comunicación presentada al XIth European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology. Lisboa, 14-17 Mayo.
• Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., Ripoll, P., González-Navarro, P. y Peiró, J.M. (2007). Antecedents of trust in teams with different virtuality levels. A longitudinal study. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 9, 30-53.
• Zornoza, A., Ripoll, P., Orengo, V., González-Navarro, P. y Peiró, J.M. (2008). Los procesos de influencia social en entornos virtuales y su incidencia sobre la eficacia grupal. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40 (2), 213-227.