Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del cuestionario de clima en el deporte

  1. Balaguer Solá, Isabel
  2. Castillo Fernández, Isabel
  3. Duda, Joan L.
  4. Tomás Marco, María Inés
Revista:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Año de publicación: 2009

Volumen: 18

Número: 1

Páginas: 73-83

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del deporte

Resumen

The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Sport Climate Questionnaire (S-SCQ) (SDT, Sport Climate Questionnaire, n.d.) were determined from a sample of 301 Spanish high-level competitive athletes (171 men and 130 women) from the Community of Valencia. The S-SCQ assesses athletes' perceptions of coach-provided autonomy support. The assumed uni-dimensional structure of both the long and short versions of the instrument was supported. Both versions also exhibited high reliability (internal consistency). Support for the convergent validity of the scale(s) was also obtained as the measure of coach autonomy support significantly related to the different types of motivation regulations (as assessed via the Sport Motivation Scale; Pelletier et al., 1995), in accordance with theoretical predictions.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adie, J., Duda, J. L. y Ntoumanis, N. (2008). Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory. Motivation and Emotion. DOI 10.1007/sll031-008-9095-z
  • Balaguer, I., Castillo, I. y Duda, J. L. (2003). La Escala de Motivación Deportiva: una nueva medida de la motivación intrinseca, motivación extn'nseca y no-motivación. Análisis psicométrico de la versión españiola. En Actas de resúmenes del II Congreso International de Psicología aplicada alDepone (p.165). Madrid: Dykinson, S.L.
  • Balaguer, I., Castillo, I. y Duda, J. L. (2007). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de motivación Deportiva en deportistas espafioles. Revista Mexicana de Psicologi'a, 24, 197-207.
  • Balaguer, I., Castillo, I. y Duda, J. L. (2008). Apoyo a la autonomia, satisfacción de las necesidades, motivación y bienestar en deportistas de competición: Un análisis de la teoría de la autodeterminacion. Re vista de Psicologia del Deporte, 17, 123-139.
  • Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., Duda, J. L., Álvarez, O. y Díaz, A. (2004). Favorecen los entrenadores la autonomía de los deportistas?: El Cuestionario de clima en el deporte. Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas. En Proceedings of the VII European Conference on Psychological Assessment (p. 174). Malaga: Facultad de Psicologfa, Universidad de Malága.
  • Carmines, E. G. y Mclver, J.P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. En G. W. Bornstedt y E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: current issues (pp. 112-133). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Cole, D. y Maxwell, S.E. (1985). Multitrait-multimethod comparisons across populations: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychobgical Bulletin, 88, 296-334
  • Deci, E. L. y Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
  • Deci, E. L. y Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
  • Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A., Sheinman, L. y Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adult's orientations toward control versus autonomy in children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642-650.
  • Duda, J. L. y Balaguer, I. (2007). Coach-created motivational climate. En S. Jowett, y D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social Psychology in Sport (pp. 117-130). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Edmunds, J., Ntoumanis, N. y Duda, J. L. (2006). A test of self-determination theory in exercise domain. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 269-286.
  • Hambleton, R. K. y Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 147-157.
  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N., Culverhouse, T. y Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784-795.
  • Hu, L. y Bender, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. En R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76-99). California: Sage Publications.
  • Jöreskog, K. y Sorbom, D. (2003). LISREL 8.54. Structural equation modeling with the Simplis command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Kasser, V. G. y Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness to vitality, well-being, and mortality in a nursing home. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 935-954.
  • Nuñez, J. L., Martfn-Albo, J. y Navarro, J. G. (2007). Propiedades psicometricas de la version espanola de la Escala de motivación Deportiva. Revista de Psicologta del Deporte, 16, 211-223.
  • Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444-453.
  • Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J. y Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279-306.
  • Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M. y Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-53.
  • Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. En E. L Deci y R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183-203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  • Reinboth, M., Duda, J. L. y Ntoumanis, N. (2004). Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motivation and Emotion, 28,297-313.
  • Ryan, R. M. y Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
  • Sport Climate Questionnaire (n.d.). Extrafdo en Junio de 2003 del sitio Web de la Self-Determination Theory (SDT): http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/ measures-/auton-sport.html
  • Vallerand, R. J. y Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169.
  • Williams, G. C, Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z., Ryan, R. M. y Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality, 70, 115-126.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet