Interrelaciones entre el clima motivacional y la cohesión en futbolistas cadetes

  1. Castillo Fernández, Isabel
  2. Balaguer Solá, Isabel
  3. Duda, Joan L.
Revue:
EduPsykhé: Revista de psicología y educación

ISSN: 1579-0207

Année de publication: 2003

Titre de la publication: Perspectivas actuales de la psicología de la actividad física y del deporte

Volumen: 2

Número: 2

Pages: 243-258

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: EduPsykhé: Revista de psicología y educación

Résumé

The aim of this work is to study the relationship between motivational climate and cohesion in 140 youth soccer players representing 9 league teams. Within the overall sample, 9 teams participated in cadete (ages 13-16) divisions of the Valencia youth soccer league. Spanish versions of the PMCSQ-2 (Newton & Duda, 1993) and the GEQ (Carron, Widmeyer, & Brawley, 1985) were administered to athletes by team representatives at a team practice during a one-week target period at approximately the mid-point of the competitive league season. Task climate was the stronger predictor of task and social cohesion.

Références bibliographiques

  • Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals, motivational climate, and motivational processes. En G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 161-176). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Balaguer, I., Duda, J. L., Atienza, F. L., y Mayo, C. (2002). Situational and dispositional goals as predictors of perceptions of individual and team improvement, satisfaction and coach ratings among elite female handball teams. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 293-308.
  • Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., Moreno, Y., Garrigues, V., y Soriano, L. (2003). El clima motivacional y la cohesión en equipos de fútbol. VIII Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social. Torremolinos (Málaga).
  • Balaguer, I., Duda, J. L., y Crespo, M. (1999). Motivational climate and goal orientations as predictors of perceptions of improvement, satisfaction and coach ratings among tennis players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine y Science in Sports, 9, 1-8.
  • Balaguer, I., Mayo, C., Atienza, F., y Duda, J. L. (1997). Factorial validity of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2 in the case of Spanish elite female handball teams (abstract). Journal of Sport y Exercise Psychology, 19, 27.
  • Carless, S. A., y DePaula, C. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31, 71-88.
  • Carron, A. V., y Dennis, P. W. (2001). The sport team as an effective group. En J. M. Williams (Ed.), Applied Sport Psychology. Personal growth to peak performance (pp. 120-134). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
  • Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., y Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. En J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
  • Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., y Eys, M. A. (2002). Team cohesion and teams success in sport. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20, 119-226.
  • Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., y Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
  • Castillo, I., Balaguer, I., y Pérez-Recio, G. (en curso). Cuestionario de Entorno de Grupo: Versión española para medir la cohesión grupal.
  • Cota, A. A., Evans, C. R., Dion, K. L., Kilik, L., y Longman, R. S. (1995). The structure of group cohesion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 572- 580.
  • Cox, R. H. (1990). Sport psychology: Concepts and applications. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
  • Dion, K. L. (2000). Group cohesión: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics, 4, 7-26.
  • Duda, J. L. (2001). Goals perspectives research in sport: Pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstandings. En G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 129-182). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Duda, J. L., y Balaguer, I. (1999). Toward an integration of models of leadership with a contemporary theory of motivation. En R. Lidor, y M. Bar-Eli (Eds.), Sport Psychology: Linking theory and practice (pp. 213-230). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
  • Duda, J.l., y Whitehead, J. (1998). Measurement of goal perspectives in the physical domain. En J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp.21-48). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
  • Dyce, J. A., y Cornell, J. (1996). Factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire among musicians. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 263-264.
  • Gill, D. L. (1978). Cohesiveness and peformance in sport groups. En R. S. Hutton (Ed.), Exercise and sport science reviews (Vol. 5, pp. 131-155). Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publications Affiliates.
  • Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. From attraction to social identity. New York: Harvester.
  • Newton, M. L., Duda, J. L., y Yin, Z. (2000). Examination of the psychometric properties of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire – 2 in a sample of female athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 275-290.
  • Newton, M. L., y Duda, J. L. (1993). The Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire: Construct and Predictive utility. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 5-56.
  • Nicholls, J.G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Ntoumanis, y Biddle, S. (1999). A review of motivational climate in physical activity. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 643-665.
  • Pardo, A., y Mayo, C. (1999). El estudio de la orientación de metas, el clima motivacional y la cohesión grupal en balonmano. En I. Balaguer, y I. Castillo (Coord.), Rendimiento y bienestar en los deportistas de élite (pp. 101-123). Valencia: CSV.
  • Paskevich, D. M. (1995). Conceptual and measurement factors of collective efficacy in its relationship to cfohesion and performance outcome. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
  • Paskevich, D. M., Estabrooks, P. A., Brawley, L. R., y Carron, A. V. (2001). Group cohesion in sport and exercise. En R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, y C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 472-494). New York: John Wiley y Sons, Inc.
  • Pensgaard, A. M., y Roberts, G. C. (2000). The relationship between motivational climate, perceived ability and sources of distress among elite athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 191-200.
  • Prapavessis, H., y Carron, A. V. (1997). The role of sacrifice in the dynamics of sports teams. Group Dynamics, 1, 231-240.
  • Schutz, R. W., Eom, H. J., Smoll, F. L., y Smith, R. E. (1994). Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 226-236.
  • Seifriz, J. J., Duda, J. L., y Chi, L. (1992). The relationship of perceived motivational climate and intrinsic motivation and beliefs about success in basketball. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 375-391.
  • Spink, K. S., y Carron, A. V. (1992). Group cohesion and adherence in exercise classes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 78-86.
  • Wann, D. L. (1997). Sport psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
La source de données: Dialnet