Publikationen in Zusammenarbeit mit Forschern von Hospital General Universitario de Elche (19)

2023

  1. Dual neoadjuvant blockade plus chemotherapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of women with non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Clinical and Translational Oncology, Vol. 25, Núm. 4, pp. 941-958

  2. The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review

    Clinical and Translational Oncology, Vol. 25, Núm. 2, pp. 417-428

2022

  1. The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy: an overview

    Clinical and Translational Oncology, Vol. 24, Núm. 9, pp. 1744-1754

2020

  1. Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine After Standard Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01)

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 38, Núm. 3, pp. 203-213

2019

  1. A Pathology-Based Combined Model to Identify PAM50 Non-luminal Intrinsic Disease in Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

    Frontiers in Oncology, Vol. 9, Núm. APR

2018

  1. Outcomes of single versus double hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. A GEICAM/9906 sub-study

    European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 94, pp. 199-205

  2. Prognostic role for the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in early breast cancer: a GEICAM/9906 substudy

    Clinical and Translational Oncology, Vol. 20, Núm. 12, pp. 1548-1556

2017

  1. A definition for aggressive disease in patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: an expert consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)

    Clinical and Translational Oncology, Vol. 19, Núm. 5, pp. 616-624

2015

  1. Epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel versus epirubicin plus docetaxel followed by capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for node-positive early breast cancer: Results from the GEICAM/2003-10 study

    Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 33, Núm. 32, pp. 3788-3795

2014

  1. Predicting response and survival in chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer

    British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 111, Núm. 8, pp. 1532-1541

2013

  1. Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: Results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study

    Journal of Clinical Oncology

  2. Obesity and survival in operable breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes according to pathological subtypes: A pooled analysis

    Breast Cancer Research, Vol. 15, Núm. 6

2011

  1. Hormone-responsive breast cancer

    Advances in Therapy, Vol. 28, Núm. 12, pp. 1045-1058

2010

  1. Adjuvant docetaxel for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer

    New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 363, Núm. 23, pp. 2200-2210

  2. Current controversies in the management of breast cancer

    Clinical and Translational Oncology, Vol. 12, Núm. 4, pp. 278-286

  3. Erratum: Current controversies in the management of breast cancer (Clinical and Translational Oncology 12:4 (278-286))

    Clinical and Translational Oncology

2008

  1. Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone or followed by paclitaxel for early breast cancer

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 100, Núm. 11, pp. 805-814

2007

  1. Evidence-based use of taxanes in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer. A review of randomized phase III trials

    Cancer Treatment Reviews, Vol. 33, Núm. 5, pp. 474-483

  2. The use of taxanes in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer: A review of randomized phase II/III trials

    Clinical Breast Cancer, Vol. 7, Núm. 10, pp. 764-774