Cross-culturally approaching the cycling behaviour questionnaire (CBQ): Evidence from 19 countries

  1. Useche, Sergio A. 23
  2. Alonso, Francisco 23
  3. Boyko, Aleksey
  4. Buyvol, Polina 5
  5. Castañeda, Isaac 1
  6. Cendales, Boris
  7. Cervantes, Arturo 1
  8. Echiburu, Tomas
  9. Faus, Mireia 23
  10. Feitosa, Zuleide
  11. Gene, Javier
  12. Gonzalez-Marin, Adela
  13. Gonzalez, Victor
  14. Gnap, Jozef
  15. Ibrahim, Mohd K.
  16. Janstrup, Kira H.
  17. Javadinejad, Arash
  18. Makarova, Irijna
  19. McIlroy, Rich
  20. Mikusova, Miroslava
  21. Møller, Mette
  22. Ngueuteu-Fouaka, Sylvain
  23. O'Hern, Steve
  24. Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio
  25. Shubenkova, Ksenia
  26. Siebert, Felix
  27. Soto, Jose
  28. Stephens, Amanda N.
  29. Valle-Escolano, Raquel
  30. Wang, Yonggang
  31. Willberg, Ellias
  32. Wintersberger, Phillip
  33. Zeuwts, Linus
  34. Zulkipli, Zarir H.
  35. Montoro, Luis 4
  36. Erakutsi egile guztiak +
  1. 1 Universidad Anahuac México : Naucalpan, State of Mexico, MX
  2. 2 Universitat de València (2022)
  3. 3 Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Trànsit i Seguretat Viària (INTRAS)
  4. 4 Universitat de València (Departament de Psicologia Bàsica)
  5. 5 Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
Aldizkaria:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

ISSN: 1369-8478

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Alea: 91

Orrialdeak: 386-400

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1016/J.TRF.2022.10.025 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Laburpena

Given different advances in applied literature, risky and positive behaviours keep gaining ground as key contributors for riding safety outcomes. In this regard, the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ) represents one of the tools available to assess the core dimensions of cycling behaviour and their relationship with road safety outcomes from a behavioural perspective. Nevertheless, it has never been psychometrically approached through a cross-cultural perspective. Therefore, this study aimed to perform the cross-cultural validation of the CBQ, examining its psychometric properties, reliability indexes, validity insights and descriptive scores in 19 countries distributed across five regions: Europe, America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. For this purpose, it was used the data retrieved from a full sample of 7,001 urban cyclists responding to a large-scale electronic survey. Participants had a mean age of M = 36.15 (SD = 14.71), ranging between 16 and 83 years. The results of this large-scale study empirically support the assumption that the 29-item version of the CBQ has a fair dimensional structure and item composition, good internal consistency, reliability indexes, and an interesting set of validity insights. Among these results, there can be highlighted that: (i) Structurally speaking, the questionnaire works better under a three-factor dimensionality, keeping all its 29 items, whose factor loadings are >0.400 in all cases; (ii) The CBQ shows greater reliability indexes than in previous applications using smaller samples, with good Cronbach’s alphas [0.768 - 0.915], McDonald’s omegas [0.770 - 0.913] and Composite Reliability Indexes [981 - 0.994]; and (iii) Robust tests comparing riding behaviours of riders with different levels of risk perception and crash involvement support the concurrent validity of the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire. These outcomes endorse the usefulness of the CBQ to assess both risky and positive riding behaviours of cyclists in different countries, contributing to assess and improve cycling safety from the human factors approach.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aldred, (2016), Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 90, pp. 69
  • Aldred, (2017), Transport Reviews, 37, pp. 29, 10.1080/01441647.2016.1200156
  • Banerjee, (2021), Transport Reviews, 1–25
  • Beck, (2016), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 96, pp. 219, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.012
  • Bothorn, (2022), International Journal of Legal Medicine, 136, pp. 1121, 10.1007/s00414-022-02828-8
  • Büchel, (2022), Transport Policy, 116, pp. 144, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.003
  • Buehler, (2021), Transport Reviews, 41, pp. 393, 10.1080/01441647.2021.1914900
  • Fonseca-Cabrera, (2021), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, pp. 12465, 10.3390/ijerph182312465
  • de Hartog, (2010), Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, pp. 1109, 10.1289/ehp.0901747
  • Doğru, (2021), Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81, pp. 144, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.06.002
  • Feenstra, (2011), International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 18, pp. 181, 10.1080/17457300.2010.540334
  • Green, (2021), Canadian Family Physician, 67, pp. 739, 10.46747/cfp.6710739
  • Handy, (2014), Transport Reviews, 34, pp. 4, 10.1080/01441647.2013.860204
  • Hezaveh, (2018), Journal of Transport & Health, 8, pp. 289, 10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.003
  • Huemer, (2022), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 172, 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106685
  • Iwińska, (2018), Part A, Policy and Practice, 113, pp. 291
  • Kalra, (2022), Transport Reviews
  • Kahlmeier, S., Boig, E. A., Fernandez A, C., Smeds, E., Benvenuti, F., Eriksson, U., Iacorossi, F., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Int Panis, L., Rojas-Rueda, D., Wegener, S., & de Nazelle, A. (2021). Assessing the Policy Environment for Active Mobility in Cities-Development and Feasibility of the PASTA Cycling and Walking Policy Environment Score.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,18(3), 986. 10.3390/ijerph18030986.
  • Kummeneje, (2019), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 124, pp. 40, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.021
  • Kummeneje, (2020), Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 69, pp. 135, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.007
  • Larouche, (2014), The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11, pp. 129, 10.1186/s12966-014-0129-5
  • Li, (2018), Research and Politics, 2018, pp. 1
  • Li, (2021), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 164
  • López, (2021), Sustainability, 13, pp. 8424, 10.3390/su13158424
  • Marsh, (2004), Structural Equation Modeling, 11, pp. 320, 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  • McIlroy, (2022), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 168, 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106597
  • McIlroy, (2020), Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, pp. 257, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.006
  • Møller, (2017), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 108, pp. 354, 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.016
  • Nasaescu, (2020), The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 12, pp. 85, 10.5093/ejpalc2020a10
  • Özkan, (2005), Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, pp. 355, 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.018
  • O’Hern, (2021), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10.3390/ijerph18052378
  • O'Hern, (2020), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 145
  • Oehl, (2019), Traffic Injury Prevention, 20, pp. 753, 10.1080/15389588.2019.1616179
  • Oviedo-Trespalacios, (2017), Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 49, pp. 188, 10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.011
  • Padilla, (2016), Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, pp. 436, 10.1177/0013164415593776
  • Pek, (2018), Frontiers in Psychology, 9, pp. 2104, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02104
  • Peterson, (2013), Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, pp. 194, 10.1037/a0030767
  • Prati, (2017), PloS One, 12, pp. e0171484, 10.1371/journal.pone.0171484
  • Puchades, (2018), International journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 25, pp. 70, 10.1080/17457300.2017.1341931
  • Pucher, (2007), Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28, pp. 495
  • Reason, (1990), Ergonomics, 33, pp. 1315, 10.1080/00140139008925335
  • Robinson, D., & Tannenberg, M. (2018). Self-Censorship in Authoritarian States: Response Bias in Measures of Popular Support in China. V-Dem Working Paper, 2018, 66. 10.2139/ssrn.3161915.
  • Ruiz-Hernandez, (2020), The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 12, pp. 61, 10.5093/ejpalc2020a8
  • Sanders, (2015), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 75, pp. 26, 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.004
  • Solmazer, (2020), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 138, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105459
  • Tavakol, (2011), International Journal of Medical Education, 2, pp. 53, 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  • Thomas, (2013), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 52, pp. 219, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.017
  • Timpabi, (2021), Heliyon, 7, pp. e07133, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07133
  • Tirachini, (2020), Journal of Public Transportation, 22, pp. 1, 10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1
  • Useche, (2022), Journal of Safety Research, 82, pp. 329, 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.06.009
  • Useche, (2018), Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, pp. 1021, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.003
  • Useche, (2018), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 118, pp. 86, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.022
  • Useche, (2018), PeerJ, 6, 10.7717/peerj.5616
  • Useche, (2019), Safety Science, 113, pp. 105, 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.021
  • Useche, (2019), PLoS ONE, 14, pp. e0221864, 10.1371/journal.pone.0221864
  • Useche, (2019), Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 62, pp. 587, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.014
  • Useche, (2021), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 150, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105915
  • Useche, (2021), Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 80, pp. 260, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.014
  • Useche, (2021), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 150, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105942
  • Useche, (2021), Sustainability, 13, 10.3390/su13041614
  • Ventsislavova, (2021), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, pp. 10227, 10.3390/ijerph181910227
  • Von Stülpnagel, (2022), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 164, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106470
  • Vuori, (2011), Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 21, pp. 542, 10.1097/01.jsm.0000407931.13102.0b
  • Walker, (2007), Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, pp. 417, 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.010
  • Wang, (2020), Risk Analysis, 40, pp. 1554, 10.1111/risa.13499
  • Yu, (2020), Journal of Injury & Violence Research, 12, pp. 29
  • Zenk, (2007), Health & Place, 13, pp. 452, 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.003
  • Zheng, (2019), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, pp. 4881, 10.3390/ijerph16244881