Validez factorial para factores psicosociales de demanda de la Batería UNIPSICO en empresas de tecnología chilenas

  1. Julio Lavarello-Salinas 1
  2. Pedro Gil-Monte 1
  3. Verónica Kramm-Vergara 2
  4. Pedro Gil-LaOrden 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valencia, España
  2. 2 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
Revue:
Interdisciplinaria: Revista de psicología y ciencias afines = journal of psychology and related sciences

ISSN: 0325-8203,  1668-7027

Année de publication: 2024

Volumen: 41

Número: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.16888/INTERD.2024.41.1.10 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Interdisciplinaria: Revista de psicología y ciencias afines = journal of psychology and related sciences

Résumé

The objective was to analyze the psychometric properties of the scales associated with the psychosocial factors of demand that are included in the UNIPSICO Questionnaire of a group of Chilean workers. The sample consisted of 655 workers from Chilean technology transfer companies, where 55.6 % were men, 41.3 % of the participants were between 25 and 34 years old, and 61.8 % of the workers had been in the organization for a maximum of four years. The sampling was carried out in a group of workers who worked in person and another remotely. The data collection was carried out through the UNIPSICO Questionnaire in its five scales associated with psychosocial factors of demand at work (26 items) that are grouped into: Interpersonal Conflicts (with five items, which is defined as the perception of the frequency with which the conflicts arise). coexistence with the organization's management, colleagues, supervisors, internal clients and external clients if applicable to the position), Inequity in social exchanges (with 5 items, defined as the perception of lack of justice in the organization), Role conflict (with five items that is defined as the perception that the person has of situations that cannot simultaneously satisfy their expectations with the role they have in the organization), Role ambiguity (refers to the perception of the uncertainty that the worker has regarding its function (generally explained by the lack of communication, it has five items) and finally, Workload (with six items that refer to the perception of load, either quantitative or qualitative, the first referring to the number of activities associated with work and the second to how difficult it can be to perform them.) Item analysis, construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, confidence analysis was performed. reliability according to Cronbach's alpha and predictive validity with linear regression. Regarding the results, all the items presented adequate values of asymmetry and reliability of the item, only the item "I know what the responsibilities at work are" does not meet the expected criteria. The five scales present values of asymmetry within the interval +/-1. The hypothetical factorial model of five factors presented an inadequate adjustment of the data in the first instance (GFI = .900, NNFI = .858, CFI = .897, RMSEA = .058). After correcting five covariances through the modification indices (items 3 and 4 of Role conflict; item 4 and 5 of Workload; item 1 and 5 of Interpersonal conflicts; item 2 and 5 of Workload and finally, item 3 and 4 of Interpersonal conflicts), adequate values were obtained for the associated indicators (GFI = .923, NNFI = .897, CFI = .937, RMSEA = .046). The five scales have Cronbach's alpha reliability values greater than .70. In the regression models, all the variables were significant predictors of psychosomatic problems, with the exception of role ambiguity, which obtained a significance greater than expected. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the five scales are valid and reliable for evaluating the psychosocial factors of job demand.

Références bibliographiques

  • Alvarado, R., Pérez-Franco, J., Saavedra, N., Fuentealba, C., Alarcón, A., Marchetti, N. y Aranda, W. (2012). Validación de un cuestionario para evaluar riesgos psicosociales en el ambiente laboral en Chile. Revista Médica de Chile, 140(9), 1154-1163. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872012000900008
  • Arredondo, M. y Viña, S. (2019). Experiencia cubana con el ISTAS 21 en la evaluación de los factores de riesgo psicosociales laborales en un centro de telecomunicaciones. Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo, 20(1), 58-64. https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=87659
  • Asante, J. O., Li, M. J., Liao, J., Huang, Y. X. y Hao, Y. T. (2019). The relationship between psychosocial risk factors, burnout and quality of life among primary healthcare workers in rural Guangdong province: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4278-8
  • Bravo, C. y Nazar, G. (2015). Riesgo psicosocial en el trabajo y salud en conductores de locomoción colectiva urbana en Chile. Salud de los Trabajadores, 23(2), 105-114. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3758/375844217004/html/
  • Burgos, J. (2011). Validación de constructo del cuestionario CopSoQ (ISTAS 21): una aplicación del Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio usando Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. Universidad de Chile. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/106341
  • Cerda-Silva, G. y Porras-Tapia, F. (2018). Revisión de las Propiedades de Psicométricas de la Escala de Evaluación de Riesgos Psicosociales en el Trabajo SUCESO/ ISTAS 21 en el Contexto Chileno. Ciencia y Trabajo, 20(63), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-24492018000300121
  • Dupret, E., Teherani, M., Feltrin, M., Bocéréan, C. y Pejtersen, J. H. (2012). Psychosocial risk assessment: French validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(5), 482-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812453888
  • French, J., Caplan, R. y Harrison, R. (1982). Mechanism of Job Stress and Strain. John Wiley.
  • Gil-Monte, P. (2014). Manual de psicosociología aplicada al trabajo y a la prevención de los riesgos laborales. Pirámide. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2183.9040
  • Gil-Monte, P. (2016a). The UNIPSICO questionnaire: psychometric properties of the scales measuring psychosocial resource factors. Archivos de Prevencion de Riesgos Laborales, 19(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2016.19.2.03
  • Gil-Monte, P. (2016b). The UNIPSICO questionnaire: psychometric properties of the scales measuring psychosocial demands. Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, 19(2), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2016.19.02.2
  • Gil-Monte, P, López-Vílchez, J., Llorca-Rubio, J. L. y Sánchez Piernas, J. (2016). Prevalencia de riesgos psicosociales en personal de la administración de justicia de la comunidad valenciana (España). Liberabit: Revista Peruana de Psicología, 22(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2016.v22n1.01
  • Hadžibajramović, E., Ahlborg, G. y Grimby-Ekman, A. (2019). Concurrent and lagged effects of psychosocial job stressors on symptoms of burnout. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(7), 1013-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01437-0
  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. En Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97753-001
  • Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
  • Kristensen, T. S., Hannerz, H., Høgh, A. y Borg, V. (2005). The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 31(6), 438-449. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.948
  • Lavarello-Salinas, J. R. y Gómez-Montecinos, M. B. (2017). Riesgos psicosociales en trabajadores de una empresa de transporte de Santiago de Chile. Revista de Salud Pública, 21(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.31052/1853.1180.v21.n3.17326
  • Manzini, J. L. (2000). Declaración de Helsinki: Principios éticos para la investigación médica sobre sujetos humanos. Análisis de la 5a Reforma, aprobada por la Asamblea General de la Asociación Médica Mundial en octubre del año 2000, en Edimburgo. Acta Bioethica, 6(2). http://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2000000200010
  • Mendoza-Llanos, R. y Moyano-Díaz, E. (2019). Hacia la validación del SUSESO ISTAS 21, versión breve en trabajadores de hospitales públicos. Terapia Psicológica, 37(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082019000100015
  • Moncada, S., Llorens, C., Navarro, A., Kristensen, T. S. y Moncada Lluís, S. (2005). ISTAS21: The Spanish version of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ) originales. https://istas.net/descargas/8n1orig1.pdf
  • Nuebling, M. y Hasselhorn, H. M. (2010). The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire in Germany: From the validation of the instrument to the formation of a job-specific database of psychosocial factors at work. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(3), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809353652
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hil).
  • Organización Internacional del Trabajo [OIT]. (2013). La organización del trabajo y los riesgos psicosociales: una mirada de género. Género, Salud y Seguridad en el Trabajo, 1, 8. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---americas/---ro-lima/---sro-san_jose/documents/publication/wcms_227402.pdf
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS]. (2019). Burn-out, an "occupational phenomenon": International Classification of Diseases. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases
  • Pihl-Thingvad, J., Elklit, A., Brandt, L. P. A. y Andersen, L. L. (2019). Workplace violence and development of burnout symptoms: a prospective cohort study on 1823 social educators. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(6), 843-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01424-5
  • República de Chile (2017). Ministerio De Salud Aprueba Actualización De Protocolo De Vigilancia De Riesgo Psicosocial En El Trabajo. Diario Oficial de la República de Chile, 1-17. https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=1111248
  • Siegrist, J. (2002). Effort-reward imbalance at work and health. Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, 2, 261-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3555(02)02007-3
  • Sun, C., Hon, C. K. H., Way, K. A., Jimmieson, N. L. y Xia, B. (2022). The relationship between psychosocial hazards and mental health in the construction industry: A meta-analysis. Safety Science, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105485
  • Superintendencia de Seguridad Social. (2020). Panorama Mensual Seguridad y Salud en el trabajo octubre 2020. https://www.suseso.cl/607/w3-article-612597.html
La source de données: Dialnet