Una propuesta configuracional para conectar futuros escenarios del trabajo con modelos de recursos humanos y tendencias en investigación organizacional

  1. Fernando J. Pons Verdú 1
  2. Amparo Ramos López 1
  3. Jośe Ramos López 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. CEF

ISSN: 2792-8314,  2792-8322

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 480

Pages: 209-239

Type: Article

DOI: 10.51302/RTSS.2024.18889 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. CEF

Abstract

People Management in organizations has evolved over the last 150 years in response to the numerous events that have occurred in the environment. During this period, the systemic effects of successive industrial revolutions have been altering the way organizations respond to the need to manage their HR. From this historical perspective, the current moment is presented as a challenge for the profession given the speed and depth of changes compared to previous times. This paper analyzes four scenarios to which organizations and workers must adapt, the six main HRM models, as well as the main trends and topics of interest for ongoing research. After the study of these three elements, an original proposal is developed within the configurational tradition, connecting them according to competitive effectiveness perspective. Next, various guidelines and implications are developed aimed at stimulating reflection in both academic and professional spheres, resulting in the improvement of the quality of decisions, something particularly relevant in a competitive context that often heavily penalizes mistakes

Bibliographic References

  • Acuña, Á., Ganga, F., Suárez, W. y Pons, O. (2022). Organizaciones saludables: una aproximación desde un estudio bibliométrico. Interciencia, 47(10), 456-465.
  • Baker, W. E. (2019). Emotional Energy, Relational Energy, and Organizational Energy: Toward a Multilevel Model. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 373-95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015047
  • BBC (2021). Tony Hsieh: el trágico final del fundador de Zappos, el emprendedor que quiso crear «la compañía más feliz del mundo». https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-58389111
  • Blustein, D. L. y Guarino, P. A. (2020). Work and unemployment in the time of COVID-19: The existential experience of loss and fear. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(5), 702-709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820934229
  • Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N. y Lepak, D. P. (2019). A systematic review of human resource management systems and their measurement. Journal of management, 45(6), 2.498-2.537. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0149206318818718
  • Boxall, P. y Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4.ª ed.). Pal-grave Macmillan.
  • Cantera, J. (1-3 de marzo de 2018). Psicología digital del trabajo: del big data comportamental a la neuroergonomía. II Congreso Internacional de Psicología del Trabajo y los RRHH.
  • Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C. y Michailidis, E. (2018). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers' well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. Euro-pean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
  • Dalal, R. S., Alaybek, B. y Lievens, F. (2020). Within-Person Job Performance Variability Over Short Timeframes: Theory, Empirical Research, and Practice. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 421–449. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045350
  • Delery, J. E. y Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-01931-002
  • Di Stefano, G. y Gaudiino, M. (2019). Worka-holism and work engagement: How are they similar? How are they different? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 329-347. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1590337
  • Fernández, M. B. (2021). El teletrabajo en España antes, durante y después del con-finamiento domiciliario. Revista Internacional y Comparada de Relaciones Laborales y Derecho del Empleo, 9(1), 377-409.
  • Galán, J. I. y Zúñiga, J. A. (2021). Gig economy: ¿el inicio de una nueva era en la gestión de los recursos humanos? Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. CEF, 463, 167-197. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2021.2486
  • García, N., Martín, F. y Sánchez, G. (2013). Una aproximación teórica a la valoración del doble ajuste en el diseño de la estrategia de recursos humanos. Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa, 19(2), 112-119.
  • González, J. A. y Calderón, M. M. (2022). Teletrabajo y sus impactos: una revisión y análisis bibliométrico. Aibi revista de investigación, administración e ingeniería, 10(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.2437
  • Guest, D. (15-16 de septiembre de 2022). Rethinking an old question: What is Human Resource Management?Congreso Inter-nacional de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones. En honor a José María Peiró.
  • Hax, A. y Majluf, N. (2004). Estrategias para el liderazgo competitivo. De la visión a los resultados. Granica.
  • Hax, A. y Wilde, D. L. (2003). El proyecto Delta. Estrategias para hacer más rentables las empresas en el mundo de hoy. Norma.
  • Joshi, A. y Neely, B. H. (2018). A Structural-Emergence Model of Diversity in Teams. AnnualReview of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 361-385.
  • Katzell, R. A. (1994). Contemporary meta-trends in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. En H. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette y L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2.ª ed.), vol. 4 (pp. 1-94). Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Anton-akis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bam-berger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., Ozcelik, H., Petriglieri, J. L.,... Vugt, M. V. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
  • Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. Hutchinson.
  • Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A. y Knight, C. (2020). Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 1-35. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837
  • López, L. E. (1997). Elementos para la reflexión sobre los problemas éticos en la administración educativa. Revista de la Universidad de La Salle, 25, 53-58.
  • Lorenzo, A. (10 de enero de 2023). Las tecnológicas han despedido a 81.400 empleados solo en los últimos cien días. El Economista. https://www.eleconomista.es/tecnologia/noticias/12102081/01/23/Las-tecnologicas-han-despedido-a-81400-empleados-solo-en-los-ultimos-cien-dias.html
  • Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J. y Mahajan, D. (10 de octubre de 2016). Independent work: choice, necessity, and the gig economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
  • Miles, R. E. y Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. Mc-Graw-Hill.
  • Oswald, F. L., Behrend, T. S., Putka, D. J. y Sinar, E. (2020). Big Data in Industrial-Orga-nizational Psychology and Human Resource Management: Forward Progress for Organizational Research and Practice. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 505-33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104553
  • Parker, S. K, Wang, Y. y Liao, J. (2019). When Is Proactivity Wise? A Review of Factors That Influence the Individual Outcomes of Proactive Behavior. Annual Review of Orga-nizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 221-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302
  • Peiró, J. M. (1999). El modelo «amigo»: marco contextualizador del desarrollo y la gestión de recursos humanos en las organizaciones. Papeles del psicólogo, 72, 3-15.
  • Peiró, J. M., Prieto, F. y Roe, R. A (1996). La aproximación psicológica al trabajo en un entorno laboral cambiante. En J. M. Peiró y F. Prieto (Eds.), Tratado de Psicología del Trabajo, vol. 1, (pp. 15-36). Editorial Síntesis.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
  • Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E. y Martínez, I. M. (2012). We need a hero! Toward a validation of the HEalthy and Resilient Organization (HERO) model. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 785-822. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1059601112470405
  • Samnani, A.-K. y Singh, P. (2013). Exploring the fit perspective: An ethnographic approach. Human Resource Management, 52(1), pp. 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21516
  • Schneider, B. (2021). People management in work organizations: Fifty years of learnings. Organizational Dynamics, 50(4), pp. 1-10.
  • Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L. y Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative Work Arrangements: Two Images of the New World of Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473-499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332
  • Stubbings, C., Williams, J., Brown, J., Gosling, T., Sethi, B., Sheppard, B., Sviokla, J. y Zarubina, D. (2018). Workforce of the future: The competing forces shaping 2030. Price Waterhouse Coopers report.
  • Taleb, N. N. (2012). El cisne negro. Paidós
Data source: Dialnet