Estudio comparativo de la fiabilidad y reproducibilidad de los tamaños mediodistales y las medidas de la arcada dentaria, entre la Tomografía Computarizada de haz cónico (CBCT ) y un método digital.

  1. Beatriz Tarazona Álvarez 1
  2. Vanessa Paredes Gallardo 1
  3. R. Cibrian Ortiz de Anda 1
  4. José Luis Gandía Franco 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
Ortodoncia española: Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Ortodoncia

ISSN: 0210-1637

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 62

Issue: 2

Pages: 43-51

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ortodoncia española: Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Ortodoncia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of diagnostic tools such as Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and its clinical application to dentofacial 3D image, is one of the most interesting materials and latest in Orthodontics currently possible to obtain threedimensional images of the teeth and therefore measurements on them. Objectives: To assess the reliability and reproducibility of tooth size and dental arch measurements between a Three Dimensional Method (CBCT) and a digital one. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 50 pa tients who underwent a CBCT as part of orthodontic diagnosis. The CBCT used was Picasso Master 3D ®. The images were sent in DICOM format to secure the company’s Web InVivoDental (Anatomage, San Jose, California) to obtain threedimensional images of the models. To make comparative studies were made of plaster study models these patients, digitizing them with a conventional scan ner for digital models. Once the images obtained by both methods were ready, mesiodistal tooth size, bicanine width, bimolar width, and arch leng ths were measured. Subsequently, we calculated Anterior and Total Bolton Index, and the discre pancy Index. RESULTS: The results of our study do not show significant differences between measu rements made with the two methods, so we can say that they are identical. CONCLUSIONS: The re sults of mesiodistal tooth sizes and Anterior and Total Bolton Index measured with Method Digital and Three Dimensional Method (CBCT) are very similar showing slight differences clinically signi ficant, however the results of bimolar width, bica nine width, arch lengths and the discrepancy Index are identical between Digital Method and Three Dimensional Method (CBCT).

Bibliographic References

  • 1. BALLRICK, J.W; MARTIN PALOMO, J; RUCH, E; AMBERMAN, B.D; HANS, M.G. Image distorsion and spatial resolution of a commercially aviable conebeam computed tomo graphy machine. American J Orthod Dento Orthop 2008; 134:573-82.
  • 2. BAUMGAERTEL S, MARTIN PALOMO J, PALOMO L, HANS MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomo graphy dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009: 136:19-28.
  • 3. DAMSTRA, J; FOURIE, Z; HUDDLESTON SLATER, J.J; SLATER; REN, Y. Accurancy of linear measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. American J Orthod Dento Orthop 2010; 137(1):16.e1-16.e6.
  • 4. FARMAN A.G; SCARFE W,C. Development of imaging selec tion criteria and procedures should precede cephalome tric assessment with conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2006;130(2):257-65.
  • 5. KAU CH, LITTLEFIELD J, RAYNY N, NGUYEN J, CREED B. Eva luation of CBCT Digital models and traditional models using the Little’s Index. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 435-9.
  • 6. LAGRAVERE, M.O; CAREY, J; TOOGOOD, R.W; MAJOR, P.W. Three-dimensional accurancy of measurements made with software on conebeam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dento Orthop 2008; 134:112-16.
  • 7. MISCHKOWSKI R.A; PULSFORT R; RITTER L; NEUGEBAUER J; BROCHHAGEN H.G; KEEVE E; ZÖLLER J.E. Geometric accu racy of a newly developed conebeam device for maxi llofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(4):551-9.
  • 8. PAREDES V, GANDIA JL, CIBRIAN R. Determination of Bol-ton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28:120-5. 9. PAREDES, V; GANDIA, J.L; CIBRIAN, R. Método de medición del índice de Bolton mediante digitalización de la arcada dentaria. Ortod Esp 2003; 43: 75-84.
  • 10. TARAZONA B, LLAMAS JM, CIBRIAN R, GANDIA JL, PAREDES V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a Di gital Method. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Mar 22. [Epub ahead of print].
Data source: Dialnet