Percepciones de estudiantes universitarios sobre su formación en física en educación secundaria

  1. Torres, Nidia 1
  2. Bolívar, Alejandro 1
  3. Solbes, Jordi 2
  4. Parada, Mónica 1
  1. 1 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
    info

    Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia

    Tunja, Colombia

    ROR https://ror.org/04vdmbk59

  2. 2 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Zeitschrift:
Actualidad y Divulgación UDCA

ISSN: 0123-4226,  2619-2551

Datum der Publikation: 2018

Titel der Ausgabe: Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica. Julio-Diciembre

Ausgabe: 21

Nummer: 2

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.31910/RUDCA.V21.N2.2018.975 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Actualidad y Divulgación UDCA

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

This article presents the results of a diagnostic questionnaire about perceptions towards physics, by 104 students who start their professional careers as future graduates in Natural Sciences and Environmental Education in a Colombian university. This study focused on the following categories: experiences on learning of physics, methodology of teacher in the physics class, difficulties of the students to learn physics and suggestions to improve their teaching. The results reflect importance of exploring and generating strategies that optimize the four dimensions; for example, in relation to the learning of physics, the participants show the predominance of the abstract approach. Likewise, they indicate the need to include experimental practices and their contextualization in teaching of physics. Positive comments were found towards the study of physics when students have studied it from the first grades of secondary basic education, which suggests that an earlier and qualitative education may favor interest in the teaching of physics.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • ABUBAKAR, S.; DANJUMA, I. 2012. Effects of explicit problem-solving strategy on student’s achievement and retention in senior secondary school physics. Journal of Science, Technology and Education. 1(1):123-128.
  • ANGELL, C.; GUTTERSRUD, Ø.; HENRIKSEN, E.K.; ISNES, A. 2004. Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils' and teachers' views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education- 88(5):683-706.
  • BOLÍVAR, A.; TORRES, N.; SOLBES, J. 2017. Propuesta de contextualizar la enseñanza de la física usando los accidentes de tráfico. Enseñanza de las ciencias, Nº extra. P.561-566.
  • BANFIELD, J.; WILKERSON, B. 2014. Increasing student intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy through gamification pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Education Research. 7(4):291-298.
  • BIGOZZI, L.; TARCHI, C.; FALSINI, P.; FIORENTINI, C. 2014. ‘Slow Science’: Building scientific concepts in physics in high school. International J. Science Education. 36(13):2221-2242.
  • BOIXADERAS, N.; DE LA VILA, J.; SANMARTÍ, N. 1990. Test de actitudes relacionadas con la asignatura de física y química. Departamento de Didáctica de las matemáticas y las ciencias experimentales, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. 5p.
  • CERÓN, M.C. 2006. Metodologías de la investigación social. LOM ediciones. Santiago de Chile. 219p.
  • COLETTA, V.P.; PHILLIPS, J.A. 2005. Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability. American J. Physics. 73(12): 1172-1182.
  • DOCKTOR, J.L.; STRAND, N.E.; MESTRE, J.P.; ROSS, B.H. 2015. Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 11(2).1-13.
  • DRURY, C.; ALLEN, A. 2002. Task force on the physical sciences: report and recommendations. Department of Education and Science. Ireland. 200p.
  • EDGAR, T.W.; MANZ, D.O. 2017. Research methods for cyber security. Syngress. Unites States. 428p.
  • GEORGE, R. 2000. Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. Science Education and Technology. 9(3):213-225.
  • GOERTZEN, R.M.; SCHERR, R.E.; ELBY, A. 2010. Respecting tutorial instructors' beliefs and experiences: A case study of a physics-teaching assistant. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research. 6(2): 020125.
  • KEYS, C.W.; BRYAN, L.A. 2001. Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. J. Research in Science Teaching. 38(6):631-645.
  • KOENIG, K.M.; ENDORF, R.J.; BRAUN, G.A. 2007. Effectiveness of different tutorial recitation teaching methods and its implications for TA training. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research. 3(1): 010104.
  • MORTIMER, E.; SCOTT, P. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classroomsaa. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). 150p.
  • OSBORNE, J.; SIMON, S.; COLLINS, S. 2003. Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International J. Science Education. 25(9):1049-1079.
  • PINOCHET, J.; RIVERA, M. 2014. Adaptación y validación del Scale of Attitudes Towards Physics (SAP) en una muestra de estudiantes chilenos de ingeniería. Latin-American J. Physics Ed. 8(1):65-74.
  • REBELLO, N.S.; CUI, L.; BENNETT, A.G., ZOLLMAN, D.A., OZIMEK, D.J. 2007. Transfer of learning in problem solving in the context of mathematics and physics. In: D. Jonassen (Ed.). Learning to solve complex scientific problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum. p.223-246.
  • ROBLES, A.; SOLBES, J.; CANTÓ, J.R.; LOZANO, O.R. 2015. Actitudes de los estudiantes hacia la ciencia escolar en el primer ciclo de la Enseñanza Secundaria Obligatoria. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las ciencias. 14(3):361-376.
  • ROCARD, M.; CSERMELY, P.; JORDE, D.; LENZEN, D.; WALBERG-HENRIKSSON, H.; HEMMO, V. 2007. Science education Now: A renewed Pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Communities: Belgium. p.1-22.
  • SOLBES, J. 2013. ¿Física contemporánea o física para la ciudadanía? Alambique: Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales. 75:9-17.
  • SOLBES, J.; MONTSERRAT, R.; FURIÓ, C. 2007. El desinterés del alumnado hacia el aprendizaje de la ciencia: implicaciones en su enseñanza. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales. 21:91-117.
  • STEWAR T, J.; GRIFFIN, H.; STEWART, G. 2007. Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research. 3(1):010102-6.
  • THOMSON, S.; LOKAN, J.; LAMB, S.; AINLEY, J. 2001. Lessons from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. A study commissioned by the Australian Government. p.1-9.
  • TORRES, N. 2011. Las cuestiones socio-científicas: una alternativa de educación para la sostenibilidad. Luna Azul. 32:45-51.
  • TORRES, N.; SOLBES, J. 2016. Contribuciones de una intervención didáctica usando cuestiones socio científicas para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico. Enseñanza de las ciencias. 34(2):43-65.
  • VÁZQUEZ, A.; MANASSERO, M. 2008. El declive de las actitudes hacia la ciencia de los estudiantes: un indicador inquietante para la educación científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias. 5(3):274-292.
  • VELOO, A.; NOR, R.; KHALID, R. 2015. Attitude towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement. International Education Studies. 8(3).35-43.
  • VISSER, Y.L. 2007. Convergence and Divergence in Children’s Attitudes toward the Sciences and Science Education. Learning Development Institute, Florida Atlantic University. p.3
  • ZOHAR, A.; SELA, D. 2003. Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International J. Science Education. 25(2):245-268.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet