How Fact-Checkers Define and Apply “Objective Journalism”. Cases of Study of Italy and Spain

  1. Claudia Capelli 1
  2. Lorena Cano-Orón 2
  3. Pina Lalli 1
  1. 1 University of Bologna
    info

    University of Bologna

    Bolonia, Italia

    ROR https://ror.org/01111rn36

  2. 2 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
Trípodos

ISSN: 1138-3305,  2340-5007

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: Comunication in search of trust. Journalism, advertising and digital citizenship

Número: 54

Páginas: 28-46

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.51698/TRIPODOS.2023.54.02 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Trípodos

Resumen

The process of fact-checking has emerged as a specialised practice within the news media industry. This research aims to examine how fact-checkers contribute to the construction of “objectivity” through their verification practices, with a specific focus on the methods and sources that they employ. In addition, it analyses how fact-checkers distinguish themselves from traditional practices of legacy media in how they define themselves. To achieve this, we looked into two cases of study involving two fact-checkers from Italy and two from Spain. We conducted a qualitative analysis of the self-presentation of each media outlet and a content analysis of the news they published over the course of a year. The findings reveal differences between the Spanish and Italian fact-checkers in terms of the topics covered and the sources used for debunking. Despite their perceived image as champions of “journalistic purity” and advocates of “truth”, we criticise this aspect, particularly with regard to their selection of information sources. We question how the fact-checkers’ image and identity directly impact journalism and the broader information ecosystem.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Amazeen, Michelle A. (2020). Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking. Journalism, 21(1), 95-111.
  • Anderson, Chris (2021). Fake news is not a virus: On platforms and their effects. Communication Theory, 31(1), 42-61.
  • Arqoub, Omar Abu; Elega, Adeola Abdulateef; Özad, Bahire Efe; Dwikat, Hanadi, and Oloyede, Felix Adedamola (2022). Mapping the scholarship of fake news research: A systematic review. Journalism Practice, 16(1), 56-86.
  • Bakir, Vian and McStay, Andrew (2018). Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154-175.
  • Brandtzaeg, Petter Bae; Følstad, Asbjørn, and Chaparro Domínguez, María Ángeles (2018). How journalists and social media users perceive online fact-checking and verification services. Journalism Practice, 12(9), 1109-1129.
  • Cano-Orón, Lorena; Calvo, Dafne; LlorcaAbad, Germán, and Mestre-Pérez, Rosanna (2021). Media crisis and disinformation: The participation of digital newspapers in the dissemination of a denialist hoax. Profesional de la Información, 30(4).
  • Carlson, Matt and Lewis, Seth C. (2015). Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation. Routledge.
  • Coddington, Mark; Molyneux, Logan, and Lawrence, Regina G. (2014). Fact checking the campaign: How political reporters use Twitter to set the record straight (or not). International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(4), 391-409.
  • Díez-Garrido, María; Calvo, Dafne, and CanoOrón, Lorena (2021). The mirage of truth: The instrumentalization of fact-checking to spread an ideological discourse. In Dolors Palau-Sampio, Guillermo López García, and Laura Iannelli (Eds.), Contemporary politics, communication, and the impact on democracy (pp. 133-151). IGI Global.
  • Fernández-Roldán, Alejandro; Elías, Carlos; Santiago-Caballero, Carlos, and Teira, David (2023). Can we detect bias in political fact-checking? Evidence from a Spanish case study. Journalism Practice, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2 262444
  • Ferracioli, Paulo; Kniess, Andressa Butture, and Marques, Francisco Paulo Jamil (2022). The watchdog role of fact-checkers in different media systems. Digital Journalism, 10(5), 717-737.
  • Graves, Lucas (2017). Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(3), 518-537.
  • Graves, Lucas (2018). Boundaries not drawn: Mapping the institutional roots of the global fact-checking movement. Journalism Studies, 19(5), 613-631.
  • Graves, Lucas and Cherubini, Federica (2016). The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/The%2520Rise%2520of%2520Fact-Check ing%2520Sites%2520in%2520Europe.pdf
  • Hester, Joe B. and Dougall, Elizabeth (2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811-824.
  • IFCN (2022). State of the fact-checkers 2021. Poynter. https://www.poynter.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/01/IFCN_2022_StateFactChecking2021_v06.pdf
  • Lim, Chloe (2018). Checking how fact-checkers check. Research & Politics, 5(3).
  • López, Germán (2016). Pizzagate, the fake news conspiracy theory that led a gunman to DC’s Comet Ping Pong, explained. Vox. http://www.vox.com/policy-andpolitics/2016/12/5/13842258/pizzagatecomet-ping-pong-fakenews.
  • Moreno-Gil, Victoria; Ramon-Vegas, Xavier, and Mauri-Ríos, Marcel (2022). Bringing journalism back to its roots: Examining fact-checking practices, methods, and challenges in the Mediterranean context. Profesional de la Información, 31(2).
  • Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Eddy, Kirsten, and Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis (2022). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/Digital_News-Report_2022.pdf
  • Peña Ascacíbar, Gonzalo; Bermejo Malumbres, Eloy, and Zanni, Stefano (2021). Fact checking durante la COVID-19: Análisis comparativo de la verificación de contenidos falsos en España e Italia. Revista de Comunicación, 20(1), 197-215.
  • Sampedro, Víctor and Mosca, Lorenzo (2018). Digital media, contentious politics and party systems in Italy and Spain. JavnostThe Public, 25(1-2), 160-168.
  • Schudson, Michael (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 2(2), 149-170.
  • Schudson, Michael and Anderson, Chris W. (2009). Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (108-121). Routledge.
  • Schütz, Alfred (1946). The well-informed citizen: An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research, 43(4), 463-478.
  • Singer, Jane B. (2018). Fact-checkers as entrepreneurs. Journalism Practice, 12(8), 1070-1080.
  • Singer, Jane B. (2021). Border patrol: The rise and role of fact-checkers and their challenge to journalists’ normative boundaries. Journalism, 22(8), 1929-1946.
  • Silverman, Craig (2016). This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-realnews-on-facebook?utm_term=.kvDBB2nVWj#.shQBBLp2ed.
  • Steensen, Steen; Bélair-Gagnon, Valérie; Graves, Lucas; Kalsnes, Bente, and Westlund, Oscar (2022). Journalism and source criticism. Revised approaches to assessing truth-claims. Journalism Studies, 23(16), 2119-2137.
  • Stencel, Mark; Ryan, Erica, and Luther, Joel (2022). Fact-checkers extend their global reach with 391 outlets, but growth has slowed. Duke Reporters’ Lab. https://reporterslab.org/fact-checkers-extend-theirglobal-reach-with-391-outlets-but-growthhas-slowed/?print=true.
  • Tandoc, Edson C. (2019). The facts of fake news: A research review. Sociology Compass, 13.
  • Tsang, Nathan L. T.; Feng, Mengzhe, and Lee, Francis L. F. (2022). How fact-checkers delimit their scope of practices and use sources: Comparing professional and partisan practitioners. Journalism, 0(0).
  • Ufarte-Ruiz, María José; Anzera, Giusseppe, and Murcia-Verdú, Francisco José (2020). Plataformas independientes de fact-checking en España e Italia. Características, organización y método. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 11(2), 23-39.
  • Uscinski, Joseph E. and Butler, Ryden W. (2013). Epistemology of fact checking. Critical Review, 25(2), 162-180.
  • Vázquez-Herrero, Jorge; Vizoso, Ángel, and López-García, Xosé (2019). Innovación tecnológica y comunicativa para combatir la desinformación: 135 experiencias para un cambio de rumbo. El Profesional de la Información, 28(3).
  • Vu, Hong Tien; Baines, Annalise, and Nguyen, Nhung (2023). Fact-checking climate change: An analysis of claims and verification practices by fact-checkers in four coun tries. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(2), 286-307.
  • Waisbord, Silvio R. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. Polity Press.
  • Wheatley, Dawn (2020). A typology of news sourcing: Routine and non-routine channels of production. Journalism Practice, 14(3), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1617042 Wimmer, Roger D. and Dominick, Joseph R. (2011). Mass media research. Thomson.
  • Yousuf, Mohammad (2023). Mediating the truth: Influences of routines on legacy news media fact-checking. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.20 23.2169187
  • Yousuf, Mohammad and Habib, Arif Md Tareque (2023). Influences of media routines on fact-checking: An exploratory study of sources in politifact fact-checks. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.58997/smc.v38i2.117
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet