Indicadores específicos para la detección de simulación de la dislexia

  1. José F. Cervera-Mérida 1
  2. Ana Pellicer-Magraner 1
  3. Amparo Ygual-Fernández 2
  1. 1 Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
    info

    Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03d7a9c68

  2. 2 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
Revista de educación

ISSN: 0034-8082

Año de publicación: 2024

Número: 404

Páginas: 201-226

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2024-404-623 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de educación

Resumen

El fingimiento de la discapacidad aumenta cuando los sistemas educativos y sanitarios proporcionan ayudas compensatorias. Aunque contamos con pruebas para evaluar la dislexia, la observación directa no es suficiente para detectar conductas de engaño. Para proteger a las personas que padecen esta dificultad de aprendizaje es necesario usar estrategias específicas de detección de la simulación en caso de duda. Esta investigación busca indicadores fiables que permitan asegurar que la persona tiene dislexia o la finge. METODOLOGÍA: Participaron 30 personas con dislexia, 30 simuladores y 30 controles. Se aplicó un conjunto de tareas experimentales emparejadas: en una de ellas, las personas con dislexia tenían dificultades y en la otra no. RESULTADOS: Los simuladores tienden a generalizar un patrón de exageración en todas las pruebas, mientras que las personas con dislexia responden de forma diferencial ante tareas que se relacionan con las características neuropsicológicas de su trastorno y otras tareas libres de esa influencia. DISCUSIÓN Y CONCLUSIONES: un conjunto de cinco indicadores -lectura de textos, copia de pseudopalabras, y los efectos de la frecuencia, la supresión articulatoria y el indicador fonémico- permiten la detección del fraude con índices de sensibilidad y especificidad superiores al 90%.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Afonso, O., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2015). Spelling impairments in Spanish dyslexic adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00466
  • Alameda, J., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de Frecuencias de las Unidades Lingüísticas del Castellano. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition). American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
  • Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. 2: A clinical workbook / Russel A. Barkley; Kevin R. Murphy (3. ed). Guilford Press.
  • Bønnerup, K. H., Pedersen, A. L., Weed, E., & Parrila, R. (2019). Differences in the literacy skills of Danish dyslexic students in two types of higher education programmes. Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 25(2), 173- 189. MEDLINE Complete. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1617
  • Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., Johnsen, S. K., & Cruz, M. V. de la. (2000). TONI-2: test de inteligencia no verbal: apreciación de la habilidad cognitiva sin influencia del lenguaje. TEA.
  • Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 439-454. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.439
  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 22-40. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.22
  • Doust, C., Fontanillas, P., Eising, E., Gordon, S. D., Wang, Z., Alagöz, G., Molz, B., Pourcain, B. S., Francks, C., Marioni, R. E., Zhao, J., Paracchini, S., Talcott, J. B., Monaco, A. P., Stein, J. F., Gruen, J. R., Olson, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., DeFries, J. C., … Luciano, M. (2022). Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia. Nature Genetics, 54(11), 1621–1629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588- 022-01192-y
  • Formoso, M. A., Ortiz, A., Martinez-Murcia, F. J., Gallego, N., & Luque, J. L. (2021). Detecting Phase-Synchrony Connectivity Anomalies in EEG Signals. Application to Dyslexia Diagnosis. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 21(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217061
  • Frazier, T. W., Frazier, A. R., Busch, R. M., Kerwood, M. A., & Demaree, H. A. (2008). Detection of simulated ADHD and reading disorder using symptom validity measures. Archives of clinical neuropsychology: the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 23(5), Art. 5. MEDLINE Complete. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2008.04.001
  • Gertsovski, A., & Ahissar, M. (2022). Reduced Learning of Sound Categories in Dyslexia Is Associated with Reduced Regularity-Induced Auditory Cortex Adaptation. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 42(7), 1328–1342. https://doi. org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1533-21.2021
  • Giménez, A., Luque, J. L., López-Zamora, M., & Fernández-Navas, M. (2015). A self-report of reading disabilities for adults: ATLAS. Anales de Psicología, 31(1), 109-119. APA PsycInfo.
  • González Ordi, H., Santamaría Fernández, P., & Capilla Ramírez, P. (2012). Estrategias de detección de la simulación: un manual clínico multidisciplinar. TEA.
  • Harrison, A. G., Edwards, M. J., Armstrong, I., & Parker, K. C. H. (2010). An investigation of methods to detect feigned reading disabilities. Archives of clinical neuropsychology: the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 25(2), Art. 2. MEDLINE Complete. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp104
  • Harrison, A. G., Edwards, M. J., & Parker, K. C. H. (2008). Identifying students feigning dyslexia: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection. Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 14(3), Art. 3. MEDLINE Complete. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.366
  • Hatcher, J., Snowling, M. J., & Griffiths, Y. M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 119. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection.
  • Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2000). Two alternative ways to model the relation between reading accuracy and phonological awareness at preschool age. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 77-100. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S1532799XSSR0402_01
  • Hurtubise, J. L., Scavone, A., Sagar, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2017). Psychometric markers of genuine and feigned neurodevelopmental disorders in the context of applying for academic accommodations. Psychological Injury and Law, 10(2), Art. 2. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12207-017-9287-5
  • Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (2014). NEPSY-II. Pearson.
  • Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 243-262. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400002058
  • Lindstrom, W., Coleman, C., Thomassin, K., Southall, C. M., & Lindstrom, J. H. (2011). Simulated dyslexia in postsecondary students: Description and detection using embedded validity indicators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(2), Art. 2. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.108 0/13854046.2010.537280
  • Loser, N. M. (2013). Malingering detection measure utility and concordance in a university accommodation-seeking student population [ProQuest Information & Learning]. In Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering (Vol. 74, Issue 3–B(E)).
  • Morgan, J. E., & Sweet, J. J. (2009). Neuropsychology of malingering casebook ( J. E. Morgan & J. J. Sweet (Eds.)). Psychology Press.
  • Nergård-Nilssen, T., & Hulme, C. (2014). Developmental dyslexia in adults: Behavioural manifestations and cognitive correlates. Dyslexia (10769242), 20(3), 191-207. CINAHL Complete. https://doi. org/10.1002/dys.1477
  • Ramos, J.L. & Cuetos, F. (2005). Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores. Prolec-Se (3ª Edición). TEA.
  • Re, A. M., Tressoldi, P. E., Cornoldi, C., & Lucangeli, D. (2011). Which Tasks Best Discriminate between Dyslexic University Students and Controls in a Transparent Language? Dyslexia (10769242), 17(3), Art. 3. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection.
  • Rice, M., & Brooks, G. (2004). Developmental dyslexia in adults: a research review. National Research and Development Centre for adult literacy and numeracy.
  • Rogers, R., & Correa, A. A. (2008). Determinations of malingering: Evolution from case-based methods to detection strategies. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15(2), 213-223. APA PsycInfo. https://doi. org/10.1080/13218710802014501
  • Rouweler, L., Varkevisser, N., Brysbaert, M., Maassen, B., & Tops, W. (2020). The flamingo test: A new diagnostic instrument for dyslexia in Dutch higher education students. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(4), 529-543. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.1080/088 56257.2019.1709703
  • Ryder, D., & Norwich, B. (2019). UK higher education lecturers’ perspectives of dyslexia, dyslexic students and related disability provision. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12438
  • Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2015). Reading difficulties in Spanish adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 65(1), 33-51. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection.
  • Sullivan, B.K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom Exaggeration by College Adults in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Learning Disorder Assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(3), 189- 207. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection.
  • Sweet, J. J. (1999). Malingering: Differential diagnosis. In J. J. Sweet, Forensic neuropsychology: Fundamentals and practice (pp. 255–285). Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers
  • Szenkovitz, G., & Ramus, F. (2005). Exploring dyslexics’ phonological deficit, I: lexical vs sub-lexical and input vs output processes. Dyslexia (10769242), 11(4), 253-268. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection.
  • Tops, W., Callens, M., Lammertyn, J., Hees, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Identifying students with dyslexia in higher education. Annals of Dyslexia, 62(3), 186-203. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0072-6
  • Van den Boer, M., de Bree, E. H., & de Jong, P. F. (2018). Simulation of dyslexia. How literacy and cognitive skills can help distinguish college students with dyslexia from malingerers. PloS one, 13(5), e0196903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196903
  • Yael, W., Tami, K., & Tali, B. (2015). The effects of orthographic transparency and familiarity on reading Hebrew words in adults with and without dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 65(2), 84-102. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11881-015-0100-4
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet