Información corporativa e interés públicoalgunas reflexiones

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abela, M. ; Mora, A. (2012). Understanding the consequences of accounting standards in Europe: the role of EFRAG. Accounting in Europe, 9(2), 147-170.
• Box, R. C. (2007). Redescribing the public interest. The Social Science Journal, 44(4), 585-598.
• Di Fabio, C. (2020). The use of Public Interest Arguments in the European Accounting Fleld. Accounting in Europe, 17(3), 334-366.
• García P. ; Mora, A. (2021). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa, conflicto de intereses y encaje jurídico: reflexiones sobre la situación actual, Revista AECA, 134,15-17.
• Giner, B. (2022). Sustainability reporting: some challenges from and forthe European Union. Comptabilite Controle Audit, 28 (4), 7-20.
• Giner, B. ; Luque-Vílchez, M. (2022). A commentary on the “new” institutional actors in sustainability reporting standard-setting: A European perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,13(6), 1284-1309.
• Giner, B. ; Mora, A. (2019). A vueltas con los objetivos de la información contable: ¿Un nuevo paradigma contable? Revista AECA, 127, 39-42.
• Lambert, R. (2010). Discussion on ¡mplications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 287-295.
• Mora, A. (2022). Discussion on Moving Towards the Expected Credit Loss Model under IFRS 9: Capital Transitional Arrangement and Bank Systematic Risk. Accounting and Business Research 52 (6), 680-689.
• Schmidt, J. (2012). “Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Litigation: The Role of Nonaudit Services Fees”, The Accounting Review 87(3), 1033-1065
• Zeff, S. (2012). The evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the challenges it faces. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 807-837.