¿Influyen las características del entorno en los comportamientos activos de las personas jóvenes?

  1. Javier Molina-García 1
  2. Palma Chillón 2
  3. Ana Queralt 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Tándem: Didáctica de la educación física

ISSN: 1577-0834

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 81

Páginas: 44-52

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Tándem: Didáctica de la educación física

Resumen

A partir de una serie de estudios, se puede afirmar que la práctica de actividad física de una persona se ve influida por las características del entorno en el que desarrolla su vida. En este sentido, el entorno puede ser determinante en cómo se desplaza el alumnado al centro escolar o en su nivel de actividad física y participación en juegos activos durante el tiempo de ocio.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Cain, K. L. et al. (2018). Development and reliability of a streetscape observation instrument for international use: MAPS-global. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15 (1), 19.
  • Carson, V. y Hunter, S. (2020). Physical activity domains. En T. Brusseau, S. Fairclough y D. Lubans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Youth Physical Activity (pp. 3-16). Routledge.
  • Chaput, J. P. et al. (2020). 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: summary of the evidence. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity , 17 (1), 141.
  • Estevan, I.; Queralt, A.; Molina‐García, J. (2018). Biking to school: the role of bicycle‐sharing programs in adolescents. Journal of School Health , 88 (12), 871-876.
  • Frank, L. D. et al. (2010). The development of a walkability index: application to the neighborhood quality of life study. British Journal of Sports Medicine , 44 (13), 924-933.
  • García-Cervantes, L. et al. (2014): Reliability and validity of an adapted version of the ALPHA environmental questionnaire on physical activity in Spanish youth. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 30(5), 1118-1124.
  • Guthould, R. et al. (2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child & Adolescent Health , 4 (1), 23-35.
  • Huang, J.-H. et al. (2020). Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity among Children in Low-Income Diverse Neighborhoods in New York City. Preventive Medicine, (131), 105948.
  • Huertas-Delgado, F. J. et al. (2019). A questionnaire to assess parental perception of barriers towards active commuting to school (PABACS): Reliability and validity. Journal of Transport & Health , (12), 97-104.
  • McGrath, L. J., Hopkins, W. G. y Hinckson, E. A. (2015). Associations of objectively measured built-environment attributes with youth moderate–vigorous physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, (45), 841-865.
  • Molina-García, J. et al. (2020). Different neighborhood walkability indexes for active commuting to school are necessary for urban and rural children and adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, (17), 1-11.
  • Molina-García, J. et al. (2019). Built environment, psychosocial factors and active commuting to school in adolescents: clustering a self-organizing map analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(1), 83.
  • Molina-García, J. et al. (2022). Associations between Park and Playground Availability and Proximity and Children’s Physical Activity and Body Mass Index: The BEACH Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 250.
  • Molina-García, J. y Queralt, A. (2017). Neighborhood built environment and socioeconomic status in relation to active commuting to School in Children. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 14(10), 761-765.
  • Molina-García, J. et al. (2017). Neighborhood built environment and socio-economic status in relation to multiple health outcomes in adolescents. Preventive Medicine, (105), 88-94.
  • Molina-García, J. et al. (2016). Barreras percibidas en el desplazamiento activo al centro educativo: fiabilidad y validez de una escala. Gaceta Sanitaria, (30), 426-431.
  • Queralt, A. y Molina-García, J. (2019). Physical activity and active commuting in relation to objectively measured built-environment attributes among adolescents. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 16(5), 371-374.
  • Rodriguez-Lopez, C. et al. (2017). The threshold distance associated with walking from home to school. Health Education & Behavior, 44(6), 857-66.
  • Saelens, B. E.y Handy, S. L. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(7S), S550-S566.
  • Sallis, J. F. et al. (2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health, (27), 297-322.
  • Sánchez-Miguel, P. A. et al. (2021). Does gender moderate the relationship between physical activity and body dissatisfaction among adolescents? Journal of Gender Studies, 30(6), 676-686.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet