Dar a luzDe la vulnerabilidad al empoderamiento

  1. Virginia Ballesteros 1
  2. Pablo Moreno-Romero 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Journal:
En-claves del pensamiento

ISSN: 1870-879X,  2594-1100

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 17

Issue: 33

Type: Article

DOI: 10.46530/ECDP.V0I33.597 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: En-claves del pensamiento

Abstract

Giving birth encompasses a spectrum of potentialities: it can range from a deeply traumatic experience toan empowering experience that increases the birthing person's confidence in their abilities and in their environment. The element we analyze here to understand these potentialities is the specific vulnerability of childbirth. We argue that the vulnerability of the birthing process involves a radical openness and codependency that exposes us to harm, but also enables the creation of unique bonds with one's own body and with others. We explore pain and uncontrollability as central features of the childbirth experience and propose a re-signified notion of control as key to making childbirth a positive and even empowering experience. We understand this empowerment from the coordinates of relational autonomy, since it would only be possible to achieve it if, after opening ourselves to the world and to others, we find the necessary support, trust, and care.

Bibliographic References

  • Allen, Sarah. “A Qualitative Analysis of the Process, Mediating Variables and Impact of Traumatic Childbirth”. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 16, núms. 2-3 (1998): 107-31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839808404563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839808404563
  • Arminchiardi, Susana, Emiliano Casal, Susana Chiarotti, Viviana Della Siega, y Gloria Schuster. Con todo al aire 2: reporte sobre Derechos Humanos en atención a salud reproductiva en hospitales públicos. Rosario, Argentina: Instituto de Género, Derecho y Desarrollo, 2008.
  • Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (Informe de la Relatora Especial sobre la violencia contra la mujer, sus causas y consecuencias). “Enfoque basado en los derechos humanos del maltrato y la violencia contra la mujer en los servicios de salud reproductiva, con especial hincapié en la atención del parto y la violencia obstétrica”. Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, 2019.
  • Ballard, C. G., A. K. Stanley, y I. F. Brockington. “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after Childbirth”. British Journal of Psychiatry 166, núm. 4 (1995): 525-28. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.166.4.525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.166.4.525
  • Ballesteros, Virginia. “A Stigmatizing Dilemma in the Labour Room: Irrationality or Selfishness?” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 28, núm. 5 (2022): 875-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13747
  • Batalla, Ana L. “Les veus del testimoniatge. Dany, relacionalitat i gènere”. Tesis doctoral, Universitat de València, 2021.
  • Bergum, Vangie. “The Phenomenology of Woman to Mother: the Transformative Experience of Childbirth”. Tesis doctoral, University of Alberta, 1986.
  • Bohren, Meghan A., G. Justus Hofmeyr, Carol Sakala, Rieko K. Fukuzawa y Anna Cuthbert. “Apoyo continuo para las mujeres durante el parto”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews núm. 7 (2017): 1-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6
  • Boldt, Joachim. “The Concept of Vulnerability in Medical Ethics and Philosophy”. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 14, núm. 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6
  • Brigidi, Serena. “Estratificación obstétrica interseccional”. [Con]Textos. Revista D’Antropologia i Investigació Social, (2022): 93-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/test.2022.10.93-113
  • Butler, Judith. Frames of War; When Is Life Grievable? Londres-Nueva York: Verso, 2009.
  • Bueno-Gómez, Noelia. “Conceptualizing Suffering and Pain”. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 12, núm. 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-017-0049-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-017-0049-5
  • Cohen Shabot, Sara. “‘You Are Not Qualified—Leave It to Us’: Obstetric Violence as Testimonial Injustice”. Human Studies 44, núm. 4 (2021): 635-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09596-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09596-1
  • Dahan, Orli. “Birthing Consciousness as a Case of Adaptive Altered State of Consciousness Associated With Transient Hypofrontality”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15, núm. 3 (2020): 794-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620901546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620901546
  • Davis-Floyd, Robbie. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Londres: Routledge, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001393
  • Delgado Rodríguez, Janet. “The Relevance of the Ethics of Vulnerbility in Bioethics”. Les ateliers de l’éthique/ The Ethics Forum 12, nn. 2-3 (2017): 154-179. https://doi.org/10.7202/1051280ar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1051280ar
  • Díaz Romero, Paula. “Consideraciones críticas de la noción de cuerpo propio”. Ideas y Valores 68, núm. 170 (2019): 187-203. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v68n170.63187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v68n170.63187
  • Díaz Romero, Paula. “Consideraciones sobre el dolor desde una perspectiva fenomenológica”. Co-herencia 12, núm. 23 (2015): 89-106. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.12.23.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.12.23.4
  • El-Gabalawy, Renée, Jordana L. Sommer, Robert Pietrzak, Donald Edmondson, Jitender Sareen, Michael S. Avidan, y Eric Jacobsohn. “Post-Traumatic Stress in the Postoperative Period: Current Status and Future Directions”. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien d’anesthésie 66, núm. 11 (2019): 1385-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01418-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01418-4
  • Escribano, Xavier. “Poética del movimiento corporal y vulnerabilidad: reflexión desde la fenomenología de la enfermedad”. Co-herencia 12, núm. 23 (2015): 71-88. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.12.23.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.12.23.3
  • Feito, Lydia. “Vulnerabilidad”. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, núm. 30 (supl. 3) (2007): 7-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272007000600002
  • Fineman, Martha Albertson. “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition”. En Transcending the Boundaries of Law, Martha Albertson Fineman, ed., 177-91. Routledge-Cavendish, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848531-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848531-26
  • Goberna Tricas, Josefina. “Autonomía, heteronomía y vulnerabilidad en el proceso de parto”. ENE. Revista de Enfermería 6, núm. 1 (2012): 71-78.
  • Greco, Lucrecia Raquel, Ana Gretel Echazu Böschemeier, Mariana Abbatizzti, Violeta Osorio, Regina Ricco, y Francisco Saraceno. “El Parto Planificado en Domicilio (PPD) como práctica de cuidadanía: relevamiento cuali-cuantitativo de experiencias en Argentina (2000-2018)”. Cadernos de Gênero e Diversidade 5, núm. 4 (2019): 252-273. https://doi.org/10.9771/cgd.v5i4.29455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/cgd.v5i4.29455
  • Gros, Alexis E. “¿Una teoría crítica fenomenológica? Resonancia, alienación y crítica de la sociedad en el pensamiento de Hartmut Rosa”. Argumentos. Revista de Crítica Social 22 (2020): 485-519.
  • Have, Henk ten. Vulnerability: Challenging Bioethics. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624068
  • Henriksen, Lena, Elisabeth Grimsrud, Berit Schei y Mirjam Lukasse. “Factors Related to a Negative Birth Experience — A Mixed Methods Study”. Midwifery 51, (2017): 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.004
  • Kurz, Ella, Deborah Davis, y Jenny Browne. “Parturescence: A Theorisation of Women’s Transformation through Childbirth”. Women and Birth 35, núm. 2 (2022): 135-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.03.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.03.009
  • Liedo, Belén. “Vulnerabilidad”. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, núm. 20 (2021): 242-257. https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2021.6074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2021.6074
  • Luna, Florencia. “Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers not Labels”. The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2, núm. 1 (2009): 121-139. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121
  • Mackenzie, Catriona, Wendy Rogers y Susan Dodds. “Introduction: What Is Vulnerability, and Why Does It Matter for Moral Theory”. En Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers y Susan Dodds, Vulnerability. New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, 1-32. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.003.0001
  • MacLellan, Jennifer. “Vulnerability and identity negotiation in childbith: a narrative approach”. Tesis doctoral, Middlesex University, 2019.
  • Oelhafen, Stephan, Manuel Trachsel, Settimio Monteverde, Luigi Raio y Eva Cignacco. “Informal Coercion during Childbirth: Risk Factors and Prevalence Estimates from a Nationwide Survey of Women in Switzerland”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21, 369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03826-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03826-1
  • Olza, Ibone, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Yael Benyamini, Maria Kazmierczak, Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir, Andria Spyridou, Esther Crespo-Mirasol, et al. “Women’s Psychological Experiences of Physiological Childbirth: A Meta-Synthesis”. BMJ Open, 8, núm. 10 (2018): e020347. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347
  • Olza, Ibone, Kerstin Uvnas-Moberg, Anette Ekström-Bergström, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir, Marianne Nieuwenhuijze, Stella Villarmea, et al. “Birth as a Neuro-Psycho-Social Event: An Integrative Model of Maternal Experiences and Their Relation to Neurohormonal Events during Childbirth”. Editado por Anayda Portela. PLOS ONE 15, núm. 7 (2020): e0230992. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230992
  • O’Neill, Onora. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621239
  • Parratt, Jenny, y Kathleen Fahy. “Trusting Enough to Be out of Control: A Pilot Study of Women’s Sense of Self during Childbirth”. Australian Midwifery, 16, núm. 1 (2003): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80011-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80011-9
  • Pickles, Camilla, y Jonathan Herring. “Introduction”. En Childbirth, Vulnerability and Law: Exploring Issues of Violence and Control, editado por Camilla Pickles y Jonathan Herring, 1-13. Abingdon, Oxon-Nueva York, NY: Routledge, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443718-1
  • Quattrocchi, Patrizia. “‘Seguridad’ y ‘respeto’ durante el parto y el nacimiento. El aporte de las mujeres y de las matronas españolas e italianas desde un modelo de atención no medicalizado”. (Con)textos: Revista D’Antropologia i Investigació Social, 10, núm. 1 (2022): 13-33.
  • Reed, Rachel, Margaret Barnes, y Jennifer Rowe. “Women’s Experience of Birth: Childbirth as a Rite of Passage”. International Journal of Childbirth, 6, núm. 1 (2016): 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1891/2156-5287.6.1.46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/2156-5287.6.1.46
  • Rosa, Hartmut. Resonancia. Una sociología de la relación con el mundo. Trad. Alexis E. Gros. Buenos Aires-Madrid: Katz, 2019.
  • Rosa, Hartmut. Lo indisponible. Trad. Alexis E. Gros. Barcelona: Herder, 2020.
  • Simkin, Penny. “Just Another Day in a Woman’s Life? Part 11: Nature and Consistency of Women’s Long-Term Memories of Their First Birth Experiences”. Birth 19, núm. 2 (1992): 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1992.tb00382.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1992.tb00382.x
  • Villarmea, Stella, y Brenda Kelly. “Barriers to Establishing Shared Decision‐making in Childbirth: Unveiling Epistemic Stereotypes about Women in Labour”. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26, núm. 2 (2020): 515-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13375
  • Watson, Kristy, Colleen White, Helen Hall y Alana Hewitt. “Women’s Experiences of Birth Trauma: A Scoping Review”. Women Birth 34, núm. 5 (2021): 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.016
  • Whitburn, Laura Y., Lester E. Jones, Mary-Ann Davey, y Rhonda Small. “Women׳s Experiences of Labour Pain and the Role of the Mind: An Exploratory Study”. Midwifery, 30, núm. 9 (2014): 1029-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.04.005
Data source: Dialnet