Public research organizations’ interactions with firmsFactors driving the perceived benefits

  1. García Granero, Ana 1
  2. Vega Jurado, Jaider
  3. Manjarrés Henríquez, Liney
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revista:
CIRIEC - España. Revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa

ISSN: 0213-8093

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 107

Páginas: 227-257

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7203/CIRIEC-E.107.23009 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: CIRIEC - España. Revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper investigates which factors are more effective when taking advantage of benefits perceived by firms in their collaborations with public research organizations (PROs). The empirical study is based on a survey of firms that have collaborated with the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), the largest PRO in Spain. We performed an ordinal probit regression, where the dependent variables reflect the importance of benefits from the interaction. We add to previous literature by considering benefits beyond innovation results and by studying the firm´s absorptive capacity and knowledge search strategy as determinants of such benefits. Our results show that firms need to have a certain level of absorptive capacity to take advantage of the collaboration with PROs, but that R&D is not the only antecedent that must be considered. Prior collaborative experience with PROs appears as an important factor to exploit these interactions, in particular as a way to develop internal capabilities and obtain long-term benefits. The study also outlined the firm´s external search strategy as a relevant factor in determining the benefits obtained from interactions with PROs.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • APA, R., DE MARCHI, V., GRANDINETTI, R. & SEDITA, S. (2021): “University-SME collaboration and innovation performance: the role of informal relationships and absorptive capacity”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 961-988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09802-9
  • ARZA, V. & VAZQUEZ, C. (2010): “Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina: analysis of channels and benefits for researchers and firms”, Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 499-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X512728
  • BARGE-GIL, A. (2010): “Open, semi-open and closed innovators: towards an explanation of degree of openness”, Industry and innovation, 17(6), 577-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.530839
  • BELDERBOS, R., CARREE, M. & LOKSHIN, B. (2004): “Cooperative R&D and firm performance”, Research Policy, 33(10), 1477-1492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
  • BELLINI, E., PIROLI, G. & PENNACCHIO, L. (2019): “Collaborative know-how and trust in university–industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1939-1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9655-7
  • BIERLY, P.E. & DALY, P.S. (2007): “Sources of external organisational learning in small manufacturing firms”, International Journal of Technology Management, 38(1), 45-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2007.012429
  • BISHOP, K., D’ESTE, P. & NEELY, A. (2011): “Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity”, Research Policy, 40(1), 30-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.009
  • BREKKE, T. (2021): “What Do We Know about the University Contribution to Regional Economic Development? A Conceptual Framework”, International Regional Science Review, 44(2), 229-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620909538
  • COHEN, W.M. & LEVINTHAL, D.A. (1990): “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective of learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  • COWAN, R. & ZINOVYEVA, N. (2013): “University effects on regional innovation”, Research Policy, 42(3), 788- 800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.001
  • DASPIT, J.J., RAMACHANDRAN, I, & D’SOUZA, D.E. (2014): “TMT shared leadership and firm performance: investigating the mediating role of absorptive capacity”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 26(3), 219-239.
  • DE FUENTES, C. & DUTRÉNIT, G. (2012): “Best channels of academia- industry interaction for long term benefit”, Research Policy, 41, 1666-1682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026
  • DE JONG, S.P.L. & BALABAN, C. (2022): “How universities influence societal impact practices: Academics’ sense-making of organizational impact strategies”, Science and Public Policy, 49 (4), 609–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac012
  • DUTRÉNIT, G., DE FUENTES, C. & TORRES, A. (2010): “Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and benefits for both agents: evidence from Mexico”, Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 513–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X512025
  • EISENHARDT, K.M. & MARTIN, J.A. (2000): ‘‘Dynamic capabilities. What are they?’’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266 (200010/11) 21:10/11 3.0.CO;2-E
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021): Innovation union scoreboard. Belgium
  • INTARAKUMNERD, P. & GOTO, A. (2018): “Role of public research institutes in national innovation systems in industrialized countries: The cases of Fraunhofer, NIST, CSIRO, AIST, and ITRI”, Research Policy, 47, 1309-1320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.011
  • INTARAKUMNERD, P. (2011): “Two models of research technology organisations in Asia”, Science, Technology and Society, 16, (1), 11-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097172181001600102
  • JANSEN, J., VAN DEN BOSCH, F. & VOLBERDA, H. (2005): “Managing potential and realised absorptive capacity: how do organisational antecedents matter?”, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106
  • KATILA, R. & AHUJA, G. (2002): “Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction”, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183–1194. https://web.stanford.edu/~rkatila/lagunita/KatilaSomethingold.pdf
  • LAURSEN, K. & SALTER, A. (2004): “Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?”, Research Policy, 33, 1201-1215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
  • LÖÖF, H. & BROSTRÖM, A. (2008): “Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness?”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 73-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9001-3
  • MONJON, S. & WAELBROECK, P. (2003): “Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1255-1270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00082-1
  • MUHONEN, R., BENNEWORTH, P. & OLMOS-PEÑUELA, J. (2020): “From productive interactions to impact pathways: Understanding the key dimensions in developing SSH research societal impact”, Research Evaluation, 29(1), 34-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz003
  • NETER, J., KUTNER, M.H., NACHTSHEIM, C.J. & WASSERMAN, W. (1996): Applied linear statistical methods, Irwin, Chicago.
  • OECD (2003): The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development, Paris.
  • OECD (2021): OECD Economic Surveys, Spain: OECD.
  • OLMOS-PEÑUELA, J., GARCÍA-GRANERO, A., CASTRO-MARTÍNEZ, E. & D’ESTE, P. (2017): “Strengthening SMEs innovation culture through collaborations with public research organizations. Do all firms benefit equally?”, European Planning Studies, 25(11), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1279592
  • PINTO, H., FERNANDEZ-ESQUINAS, M. & UYARRA E. (2015): “Universities and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as Sources of Knowledge for Innovative Firms in Peripheral Regions”, Regional Studies, 49(11), 1873-1891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.857396
  • PODSAKOFF, P.M. & ORGAN, D.W. (1986): “Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects”, Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
  • ROUD, V. & VLASOVA, V. (2020): “Strategies of industry science cooperation in the Russian manufacturing sector”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 870-907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9703-3
  • RUIZ, J.M.C., JURADO, E.B., MORAL, A.M., UCLÉS, D.F. & VIRUEL, M.J.M. (2017): “Medición del impacto social y económico: políticas públicas de emprendimiento en Andalucía”, CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, 90, 75-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.89.8166
  • SAAD, M., ZAWDIE, G. & MALAIRAJA, C. (2008): “The Triple Helix Strategy for Universities in Developing Countries: The Experiences in Malaysia and Algeria”, Science and Public Policy, 35(6), 431-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X323316
  • SANTORO, M.D. & CHAKRABARTI, A.K. (2002): “Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions”, Research policy, 31(7), 1163-1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
  • SARRIA-PEDROZA, J. & FERNÁNDEZ-GUADAÑO, J. (2021): “Evaluación del impacto de políticas públicas: análisis temporal del programa de reindustrialización en España”, CIRIEC-Espana, 102, 291-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.102.18914
  • SCHAEFFER, P., DULLIUS, A., RODRIGUES, R. & ZAWISLAK, P. (2017):“Searching to bridge the gaps: a new typology of university-industry interaction”, Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 30(4), 459-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-05-2016-0148
  • SIEGEL, D.S., WALDMAN, D. & LINK, A.N. (2003): “Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study”, Research Policy, 32, 27-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
  • VAN DEN BOSCH, F.A., VOLBERDA, H.W. & DE BOER, M. (1999): “Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities”, Organization Science 10(5), 551-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
  • VEGA-JURADO, J., GARCÍA-GRANERO, A. & MANJARRÉS HENRÍQUEZ, L. (2021): “Do firms benefit from interactions with public research organisations beyond innovation? An analysis of small firms”. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 100148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100148
  • VEGA-JURADO, J., GUTIERREZ-GRACIA, A. & FERNÁNDEZ DE LUCIO, I. (2009): “Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(4), 637-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp023
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet