El conflicto entre el Tribunal Constitucional Federal Alemán y el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europeacomentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional Federal de Alemania, Sala Segunda [Bundesverfassungsgericht, Zweiten Senats], 2 BvR 859/15, 2 BvR 1651/15, 2 BvR 2006/15, 2 BvR 980/16, de 5 de mayo de 2020

  1. Antonio Bar Cendón
Aldizkaria:
Revista de las Cortes Generales

ISSN: 0213-0130 2659-9678

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Zenbakia: 109

Orrialdeak: 655-682

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.33426/RCG/2020/109/1545 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de las Cortes Generales

Laburpena

On May 5, 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany issued a long and harsh judgment (2 BvR 859/15) that contradicts and disavows the judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU of December 11, 2018 (C-493/17, Weiss; ECLI:EU:C:2018:1000). The Federal Constitutional Court does not hesitate to describe as incomprehensible, meaningless and, of course, ultra vires, the decision of the Court of Justice of the EU and the way in which the reasoning of the high European court was produced. In substance, what is at stake is the ECB’s Public Sector Assets Purchase Programme (PSPP) and the ECB and ESCB’s power to take such decisions, which might exceed their competence as regulator of the EU monetary policy, to fully encroach into the field of the EU economic policy. This article analyses and compares the reasoning that fundaments the respective judicial decisions and evaluates the consequences that might result from them.