Una propuesta de tipificación de las regiones no urbanas en la Unión Europea

  1. Noguera Tur, Joan 1
  2. Copus, Andrew 2
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 James Hutton Institute
    info

    James Hutton Institute

    Dundee, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/03rzp5127

Revista:
Cuadernos geográficos de la Universidad de Granada

ISSN: 0210-5462,  2340-0129

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 55

Número: 1

Páginas: 92-124

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos geográficos de la Universidad de Granada

Resumen

Ce document présente la démarche méthodologique qui conduit à l’élaboration des typologies de développement régional créées dans le cadre du projet EDORA (European Development Opportunities for Rural Areas). Ces typologies constituent un point de référence important du processus de mise à jour des stéréotypes qui sous-tendent l’élaboration et la mise en œuvre de la politique de développement régional, et peuvent devenir un outil d’appui à la prise de décisions mieux adapté à la réalité régionale européenne.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bryden J, Copus A, Mitchell M and Loughrey Y (2004) Rural Development Indicators,
  • Section 3 of the (unpublished) final report of the PAIS II project for Eurostat
  • Copus A K, Psaltopoulos D, Terluin I, Weingarten P (2008) Common Feature of Diverse European Rural Areas: Review of Approaches to Rural Typology (J05/33/2006), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, EC Joint Research Centre Seville. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC48464.pdf
  • Dijkstra L and Poelman H, (2008) Remote Rural Regions, How proximity to a city influences the performance of rural regions, Regional Focus No1, DG Regio, European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/focus/2008_01_rural.pdf
  • European Commission (EC) DG Regio (2008) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion Turning territorial diversity into strength, COM(2008) 616 final.
  • Gade O (1991) Dealing with Disparities in Regional Development – The Intermediate Socioeconomic Region, Chapter 3 in Gade O, Miller V P, Sommers L M, Planning Issues in Marginal Areas, Occasional Papers in Geography and Planning, Vol 3 Spring 1991, Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, N. Carolina.
  • Gade O (1992) Functional and Spatial Problems of Rural Development: General Considerations of an Explanatory Model, Chapter 4 in Ó Cinnéide M and Cuddy M, Perspectives on Rural Development in Advanced Economies, Centre for Development Studies, Social Sciences Research Centre, University College Galway.
  • Hodge I (2004) The economic diversity of rural England: stylised fallacies and uncertain evidence, Editorial, Journal of Rural Studies 20 (2004) 263–272.
  • Massey D (1984) Spatial Divisions of Labour, Social structures and the geography of production, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke.
  • Peet J R (1969) The Spatial Expansion of Commercial Agriculture in the Nineteenth Century: A Von Thunen Interpretation, Economic Geography, 45, p283.
  • Peet J R (1970) Von Thunen Theory and the Dynamics of Agricultural Expansion, Explorations in Economic History, 8, p181.
  • Peet J R (1972) Influences of the British Market on Agriculture and Related Economic Development in Europe, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 56, p1.
  • Saraceno E (1994) Alternative readings of spatial differentiation: The rural versus the local economy approach in Italy, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 21 Number 3-4 pp451-474.
  • Wallerstein I, (1976) The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet