The provision of public services under conditions of financial stressevidence from Spanish Autonomous Communities

  1. Antoni Zabalza 1
  1. 1 University of Valencia, Spain
Aldizkaria:
Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

ISSN: 0210-1173

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Zenbakia: 236

Orrialdeak: 65-104

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

Laburpena

The 2008 economic crisis had three consequences for Spanish regional governments: first, there was a substantial and sudden fall of their revenue, which they had no effective means to redress, while citizens demands for education, health and other services continued to increase as usual; second, their debt, which until then had been relatively small and stable, exploded to unknown levels; and third, there was a serious deterioration of the extent and quality of the set of public services provided by these governments. The first two consequences show up quite clearly in official statistics, while the third, on which arguably there is a high level of consensus among citizens, has not been systematically and formally documented. This article develops a simple model of public expenditure that explains these facts. It suggests that, under conditions of financial stress, it may be rational for regional governments to spend more than the resources they have, and thus to incur in debt finance, and at the same time to accept a deterioration of the extent and quality of the services provided to the public. More concretely, the model predicts that, if a meaningful measure of the gap between expenditure needs and revenue can be identified, then the optimal behaviour of governments is to absorb a part of this gap by borrowing and the rest by letting service provision to deteriorate. In a situation of financial stress, along with the traditional influence of revenue, demography plays a role of its own in the determination of governments’ behaviour. We test these hypotheses with a panel of data on expenditure, revenue and a series of indicators of expenditure need (essentially demographic indicators) of the fifteen “common regime” Spanish autonomous communities over the period that goes from 2007 to 2017. None of the predictions of the model is rejected by the data.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Ahrend, R., Curto-Grau, M. and Vam Malle, C. (2013), “Passing the buck? Central and sub-national governments in times of fiscal stress”, OECD Working Paper, 05-2013.
  • Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991), “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations”, Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277-297.
  • Barro, R. J. (1979), “On the determination of public debt”, Journal of Political Economy, 87: 940-971.
  • Benito, B. and Bastida, F. J. (2010), “Politics and financial management: A long-term evaluation on Spanish local governments”, International Journal of Critical Accounting, 2: 249-266.
  • BOE (2009), Ley 22/2009, de 18 de diciembre, por la que se regula el sistema de financiación de las Comunidades Autónomas de régimen común y Ciudades con Estatuto de Autonomía y se modifican determinadas normas tributarias, BOE No. 305, 19 December 2009, pp. 107086-107155. http://www.boe.es/ boe/dias/2009/12/19/pdfs/BOE-A-2009-20375.pdf.
  • Bohn, H. (1998), “The behaviour of U. S. public debt and deficits”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 949-963.
  • Borge, L. E. (2005), “Strong politicians, small deficits: Evidence from Norwegian local governments”, European Journal of Political Economy, 21: 325-344.
  • Bosch, N. and Suárez-Pandiello, J. (1995), “Seven hypotheses about public choice and local spending: A test for Spanish municipalities”, Public Finance, 50: 36-50.
  • Delgado-Téllez, M., Lledó, V. D. and Pérez, J. J. (2016), “On the determinants of fiscal non-compliance: an empirical analysis of Spain’s regions”, IMF Working Paper WP/16/XX, International Monetary Fund.
  • Drazen, A. (2000), Political Economy in Macroeconomics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Fernández-Caballero, L., Pedregal, D. and Pérez, J. (2012), “Monitoring subcentral government spending in Spain”, Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, 202(3): 77-104.
  • Foremny, D. (2014), “Sub-national deficits in European countries: The impact of fiscal rules and tax autonomy” European Journal of Political Economy, 34: 86-110.
  • Galí, J. and Perotti, R. (2003), “Fiscal policy and monetary integration in Europe”, Economic Policy, 18: 533-572.
  • Hansen, L. (1982), “Large sample properties of Generalized Method of Moments estimators”, Econometrica, 50: 1029-1054.
  • Hayashi, F. (2000), Econometrics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Hernández-de-Cos, P. and Pérez, J. J. (2013b), “The new budgetary Stability Law”, Bank of Spain Economic Bulletin, April.
  • Hsiao, C. (2014), Analysis of Panel Data (third edition), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  • Lago-Peñas, S., Fernández-Leiceaga, X. and Vaquero, A. (2017), “¿Por qué incumplen fiscalmente las Comunidades Autónomas?”, Investigaciones Regionales/Journal of Regional Research, 37: 7-29.
  • Leal, A. and López-Laborda, J. (2015), “Un estudio de los factores determinantes de las desviaciones presupuestarias de las Comunidades Autónomas en el periodo 2003-2012”, Investigaciones Regionales/Journal of Regional Research, 31: 35-58.
  • López-Hernández, A., Zafra-Gómez, J. L. and Ortíz-Rodríguez, D. (2012), “Effects of the crisis in Spanish municipalities’ financial condition: an empirical evidence (2005-2008)”, International Journal of Critical Accounting, 4: 631-64.
  • López-Laborda, J. and Zabalza, A. (2011), “Mantenimiento temporal de la equidad horizontal en el sistema de financiación autonómica”, Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, 197: 37-65.
  • Martí, F. and Pérez, J. J. (2016), “Spanish public finances through the financial crisis”, Working Paper No. 1620, Bank of Spain, Madrid.
  • Meltzer, A. and Richard, S. (1981), “A rational theory of the size of government”, Journal of Political Economy, 89: 914-927.
  • Ministerio de Hacienda (2019), Informe sobre los mecanismos de financiación de las CCAA. Balance 2012-2018, Secretaría General de Financiación Autonómica y Local, Madrid.
  • Molina-Parra, A. and Martínez-López, D. (2018), “Do federal deficits motivate regional fiscal (im) balances: Evidence from the Spanish case”, Journal of Regional Science, 58: 224-258.
  • Mueller, D. C. (2003), Public Choice III, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  • Pérez-García, F. and Cucarella, V. (2013), “Determinantes de las diferencias entre CCAA en la evolución del déficit y el nivel de endeudamiento” in S. Lago-Peñas and J. Martínez-Vázquez eds., La consolidación fiscal en España: El papel de las comunidades autónomas y los municipios (pp. 167- 199), Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Madrid.
  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000), Political economics. Explaining economic policy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Poterba, J. M., (1994), “State responses to financial crisis. The effects of budgetary institutions and politics”, Journal of Political Economy, 102: 799-821.
  • Rattsø, J. and Tovmo, P. (2002), “Fiscal discipline and asymmetric adjustment of revenues and expenditures: Local government responses to shocks in Denmark”, Public Finance Review, 30: 208-234.
  • Rodden, J. A., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack, J. (2003), Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Roberts, K. (1977), “Voting over income tax schedules”, Journal of Public Economics, 8: 329-340.
  • Romer, T. (1975), “Individual welfare, majority voting, and the properties of a linear income tax”, Journal of Public Economics, 4: 163-185.
  • Shamsub, H. and Akoto, J. B. (2004), “State and local fiscal structures and fiscal stress”, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 16: 40-61.
  • Vartapetov, K. (2011), “Russian fiscal federalism under stress: Federal support of regions during the global financial crisis”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52: 529-542.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2016), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 6th edition, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
  • Zabalza, A. (2017), “Un nuevo mecanismo de actualización para la financiación autonómica”, Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, 223(4): 67-100
  • Zabalza, A, (2021), “Plan de saneamiento de la deuda autonómica”, Investigaciones Regionales/Journal of Regional Research, forthcoming.
  • Zabalza, A. and López-Laborda, J. (2011), “The new Spanish system of intergovernmental transfers”, International Tax and Public Finance, 18: 750-786.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet