Estado y diseminación del conectivismo. Análisis bibliométrico

  1. Suárez-Guerrero, Cristóbal 2
  2. San Martín Alonso, Ángel 2
  3. Limaymanta, Cesar 13
  1. 1 Departamento de Ciencias, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú
  2. 2 Departamento de Didáctica y Organización Escolar, Universitat de València, España
  3. 3 Departamento de de Bibliotecología y Ciencias de la Información, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Education in the knowledge society (EKS)

ISSN: 2444-8729,  1138-9737

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 23

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14201/EKS.28212 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Education in the knowledge society (EKS)

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Parallel to the spectacular development of communication technologies in recent decades, research programs have emerged that seek to build learning theories that respond to the communicative project of the network society. One of these programs is the one that tries to make its way around the metaphor of "connectivism". Based on this observation, the present paper sets out to analyze the state of development of Connectivism based on publications in journals indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. For this purpose, the bibliometric analysis methodology was adopted following the Prisma model. It is detected that, although there is a rising scientific production that allows us to see a budding development of connectivism, this production is not focused on the development of the theory itself but serves as a pragmatic framework to address three central themes: MOOC, teaching approach and e-learning. The development of Connectivism in less formal publications remains to be seen, but more important is to know whether this open and networked learning framework was significant in emergent digital education and whether it will be relevant in blended education.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5–6), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017100
  • Alemán, L. Y., Sancho-Vinuesa, T., & Gómez Zermeño, M. G. (2015). Indicators of pedagogical quality for the design of a Massive Open Online Course for teacher training. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2260
  • Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2185
  • Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning: Foundations and Applications (pp. 35-50). Athabasca University Press.
  • Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
  • Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 98-118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902
  • Calvani, A. (2009). Connectivism: New paradigm or fascinating pot-pourri? Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society-English Version, 4(1).
  • Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International journal of knowledge and learning, 3(4-5), 404-420. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.016702
  • Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2021). Docencia online y Covid-19: la necesidad de reinventarse. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 13, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v13iEspecial.2149
  • Clarà, M., & Barberà, E. (2013). Learning online: massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Education, 34(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770428
  • Clarà, M., & Barberà, E. (2014). Three problems with the connectivist conception of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12040
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  • De Souza, M. E. L., da Silva Martins, O. A., Duarte, M. N. M., & da Silva, M. R. (2021). Ensino Híbrido e Conectivismo: Desafios da educação na atualidade. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, 7(3), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v7i3.759
  • Diem, A., & Wolter, S. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1). 86-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
  • Downes, S (2007, February 6). Msg. 2, Re: What Connectivism Is. Online Connectivism Conference: University of Manitoba. http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/moodle/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=12
  • Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. Essays on meaning and learning networks. https://bit.ly/3R1FNao
  • Downes, S. (2019). Recent work in connectivism. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 112-131. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0014
  • Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1081
  • Dron, J. (2018). Smart learning environments, and not so smart learning environments: a systems view. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0075-9
  • Dunaway, M. K. (2011). Connectivism: Learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39(4), 675-685. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111186686
  • Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.878352
  • Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.643
  • Fontenelle-Tereshchuk, D. (2021). ‘Homeschooling’ and the COVID-19 Crisis: The Insights of Parents on Curriculum and Remote Learning. Interchange, 52, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-020-09413-1
  • Friesen, N., & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00426.x
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic Literature Reviews. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2020). Online Assessment in Higher Education in the Time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21, 12. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23013
  • Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064-1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
  • Gómez-Gómez, M., Hijón-Neira, R., Santacruz-Valencia, L., & Pérez-Marín, D. (2022). Impact of the Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning Process on Digital Competence and Mood in Teacher Training. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, Article e27037. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.27037
  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews, (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  • Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, media and technology, 41(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
  • Han, H., Williams, J., & Cui, S. (Eds.) (2021). Tackling Online Education: Implications of Responses to COVID-19 in Higher Education Globally. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Hansen, M. (2008). Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e1051. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1051
  • Hansen, M. M., Miron-Shatz, T., Lau, A. Y. S., & Paton, C. (2014). Big data in science and healthcare: a review of recent literature and perspectives. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 23(01), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2014-0004
  • Hine, C. (2011). Etnografía virtual. Editorial UOC.
  • Jandrić, P. (2020) The Day After Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00195-4
  • Jung, I. (2019). Connectivism and Networked Learning. In Open and Distance Education Theory Revisited (pp. 47-55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_6
  • Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704
  • Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
  • Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7), 74-93. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041
  • Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
  • Lange, M. (2012). Talk: Connectivism. https://bit.ly/3qSATCj
  • Limaymanta, C. H., Apaza-Tapia, L., Vidal, E., & Gregorio-Chaviano, O. (2021). Flipped Classroom in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis and Proposal of a Framework for its Implementation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(09), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.21267
  • Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
  • Moher, D., Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Onyema, E. M., Eucheria, N. C., Obafemi, F. A., Sen, S., Atonye, F. G., Sharma, A., & Alsayed, A. O. (2020). Impact of Coronavirus pandemic on education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(13), 108-121.
  • Ortiz, J. A. T., & Corrêa, T. H. B. (2020). Aspectos pedagógicos del conectivismo y su relación con redes sociales y ecologías del aprendizaje. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 25. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-24782020250026
  • Parmaxi, A., Nicolaou, A, Kakoulli Constantinou, E, Soulé, M. V, Papadima, Sophocleous, S., & Perifanou, M. (2021). Learning theories and teaching methodologies for the design of training in digital competence for language teachers: a narrative review. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences (pp. 125–139, Volume 12784) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_9
  • Peters M. A. (Ed.) (2017). Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4
  • Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.934
  • Rivas, A. (2021). The Platformization of Education: A framework to Map the New Directions of Hybrid Education Systems. Progress Reflection, 46. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377733
  • Sánchez-Cabrero, R., &. Costa-Román, O. (2018). Psychopedagogical predecessors of connectivism as a new paradigm of learning. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 4(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.18562/IJEE.037
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  • Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Lulu.com
  • Siemens, G. (2015). The role of MOOCs in the future of education. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.). MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 8–18). Routledge.
  • Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143
  • Van Dijck, J. (2016). La cultura de la conectividad. XXI-Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1635-1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In: Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram, (Eds.). Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice (pp. 285-320). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  • Verhagen, P. (2006). Connectivism: A new learning theory? Surf e-learning themasite, https://bit.ly/3xIjqAi
  • Voskoglou, M. G. (2022). Connectivism vs Traditional Theories of Learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-10-4-15
  • Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
  • Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883
  • Williamson, B., & Hogan, A. (2021) Pandemic Privatisation in Higher Education: Edtech and University Reform. Education International. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/209029/
  • Zapata-Ros, M. (2015). Teorías y modelos sobre el aprendizaje en entornos conectados y ubicuos. Bases para un nuevo modelo teórico a partir de una visión crítica del “conectivismo”. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1), 69-102. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks201516169102
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet