¿Qué es esa cosa llamada cultura científica comunitaria? Una aproximación y un modelo de análisis

Referencias bibliográficas

• Akrich, M. (2016, agosto 31). Inquiries into experience and the multiple politics of knowledge [Keynote Plenary 1: to what extent is embodied knowledge a form of science and technology by other means?]. 4S-EASST Meeting, Barcelona, España. https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01364031v2
• Balazs, C. L. y Morello-Frosch, R. (2013). The Three Rs: How Community-Based Participatory Research Strengthens the Rigor, Relevance, and Reach of Science. Environmental Justice, 6(1), 9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2012.0017
• Bauer, M. W. (2014). Cultura científica y sus indicadores. Una revisión actualizada. En B. Laspra y E. Muñoz (Coord.). Culturas científicas e innovadoras. Progreso social (pp. 101-126). Eudeba.
• Bauer, M. W., Petkowa, K. y Boyadjieva, P. (2000). Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the ’Science War’. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500102
• Beresford, P. (2019). Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge. Frontiers in Sociology, 3:41. https://doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2018.00041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00041
• Berger, P. L. y Luckmann, T. (1966/1986). La construcción social de la realidad. Amorrortu.
• Bloor, D. (1976/1991). Knowledge and social imagery. University of Chicago Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social. Notes provisoires. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31, (2-3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1979.2654
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. En J. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
• Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Éditions du Seuil.
• Brown, P. (1992). Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2137356
• Brown, P. (1997). Popular Epidemiology Revisited. Current Sociology, 45, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139297045003008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001139297045003008
• Callard, F. y Perego, E. (2021). How and why patients made Long Covid. Social Science & Medicine, 268, 113426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426
• Callon, M. y Rabeharisoa, V. (2007). The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life. Lessons from the French Association of neuromuscular disease patients. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 230–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311264
• Corburn, J. (2005). Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6494.001.0001
• Cortassa, C. G. (2010). Del déficit al diálogo, ¿y después? Una reconstrucción crítica de los estudios de percepción. Revista CTS, 14(5), 117-124.
• de Cózar-Escalante J.M. y Núñez-Castro A. M. (2018) Matters of Concern Regarding Nanotechnology. En B. Laspra y J. López Cerezo (Eds.). Spanish Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71958-0_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71958-0_14
• de Cózar-Escalante, J. M. y Gómez Ferri, J. (2021). Community-based scientific culture: wave or particle? En A.Muñoz van den Eynde y C. Polino (Coords.). Pocket Science. The Praxeological Dimension of ScientificCulture (pp. 43-58). CIEMAT.
• de Kerckhove, D. (1995/1999). La piel de la cultura: investigando la nueva realidad electrónica. Gedisa.
• Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. En J. A. Boydston (Ed.), (1988) The later works, 1925-1953 (vol. 2) Southern Illinois University Press.
• Durkheim, E. (1898). Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morales, VI, 273-300.
• Epstein, S. (1995). The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science, Technology & Human Values, 20(4), 408-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000402
• Farr, R. (1993). Common sense, science and social representations. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 189-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/2/3/001
• Fleck, L. (1935/1986). La génesis y el desarrollo de un hecho científico. Alianza Editorial.
• Foucault, M. (1966/1968). Las palabras y las cosas. Siglo XXI.
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowking. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
• Fuller, S. (1987). On Regulating What Is Known: A Way To Social Epistemology. Synthese, 73(1), 145-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485445
• Goldman, A. (1987). Foundations of Social epistemics. Synthese, 73(1), 109-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485444
• Gómez Ferri, J. (2014). Ciència Ciutadana o Ciutadanies Científiques? Quatre Models de Participació en Ciència i Tecnologia. International Journal of Deliberative Mechanisms in Science, DEMESCI 3(1), 24-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.4471/demesci.2014.13
• Godin, B. y Gingras, Y. (2000). What Is Scientific and Technological Culture and How Is It Measured. A Multidimensional Model. Public Understanding of Science, 9(1), 43-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/303
• Haas, P. M. (1989). Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution. International Organization, 43(3), 377–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300032975
• Hess, D., Breyman, S., Campbell, N. y Martin, B. (2008). Science Technology and Social Movements. En J. Hackett Edward, O. Amsterdamska y M. Lynch (Eds.). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp.473-498). The MIT Press.
• House of Lords (2000). Science and Technology– Third Report. Report of the Science and Technology Committee. Paper 38. London: H.M. Stationery Office. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. The MIT press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
• Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva, 41, 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1975). La estructura delas revoluciones científicas. FCE.
• Lave, J. y Wanger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
• Lee, S. y Roth, W. (2003). Science and the “Good Citizen”: Community Based Scientific Literacy. Science, Technology & Human Values, 28(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903028003003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903028003003
• Lengwiler, M. (2008). Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262
• Levine, A. G. (1982). Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People. Heath & Co.
• Lévy, P. (1994). L‘Intelligence collective. La Découverte.
• López Cerezo, J. A. (2005). Participación ciudadana y cultura científica, Arbor CLXXXI, (715), 351-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2005.i715.417
• López Cerezo, J. A. (2017). Comprender y comunicar la ciencia. Los Libros de la Catarata.
• Merton, R. K. (1938/1984). Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad en la Inglaterra del siglo XVII. Alianza Editorial.
• Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
• Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3): 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
• Moscovici, S. (1961/1979). El psicoanálisis, su imagen y su público. Editorial Huemul.
• Nash, J. y Kirsch M. (1986). Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Electrical Machinery Industry: An Ethnological Study of Community Action and Corporate Responsibility. Social Science and Medicine, 23(2), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(86)90361-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(86)90361-8
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. The National Academies Press.
• Nonaka, I. y Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3
• Pardo Avellaneda, R. (2014). De la alfabetización científica a la cultura científica: un nuevo modelo de apropiación social de la ciencia. En B. Laspra y E. Muño (Eds.). Culturas científicas e innovadoras. Progreso social (pp. 39-72). Eudeba.
• Pella, M. O., O’Hearn, G. T. y Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(3), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660040317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660040317
• Rabeharisoa, V. y Callon, M. (1998). L’implication des malades dans les activite´s de recherche soutenues par l’Association française contre les myopathies, Sciences Sociales et Sante, 16(3), 41–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/sosan.1998.1435
• Rabeharisoa, V. y Callon, M. (1999). Le pouvoir des malades: l’Association française contre les myopathies et la recherche. Presses de l’Ecole des mines de Paris.
• Rabeharisoa, V. y Callon, M. (2000). Les associations de malades et la recherche: I. Des self-help groups aux associations de malades, Med Sci, 16(8-9), 945-949. http://hdl.handle.net/10608/1762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4267/10608/1762
• Rabeharisoa, V. y Callon, M. (2002). The Involvement of Patients’ Associations in Research. International Social Science Journal, 54, 57–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00359
• Rabeharisoa, V., Moreira, T. y Akrich, M. (2014). Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society, BioSocieties, 9(2), 111–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.2
• Roberts, D. A. y Bybee, R. W. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. En S. Abell y N. G. Lederman, (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 729-780). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Roth, W. y Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11(1), 33-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/1/302
• Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science Literacy: Public understanding of science is becoming vitally needed in developing and industrialized countries alike. American Scientist, 63(3), 265-268.
• Torres, C. (2005). Representaciones sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 111, 9-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40184698
• Villasante, T., Montañés, M. y Martí, J. (Eds.) (2000). La investigación social participativa. Construyendo ciudadanía. El viejo topo.