De la conservación fortaleza neoliberal a la conservación socialmente justa basada en datos.Una conversación con Dan Brockington

  1. Brockington, Dan entrevistado 1
  2. Requena-i-Mora, Marina entrev. 2
  1. 1 University of Sheffield
    info

    University of Sheffield

    Sheffield, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/05krs5044

  2. 2 Universitat Jaume I
    info

    Universitat Jaume I

    Castelló de la Plana, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02ws1xc11

Revista:
Encrucijadas: Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales

ISSN: 2174-6753

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: Neoliberalización de la naturaleza

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Encrucijadas: Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales

Resumen

La presente conversación se divide en tres partes. Primero, discutimos por qué la conservación no es siempre una solución beneficiosa y por qué es necesario problematizar la Conservación convencional. En este sentido, Brockington argumenta que existe una historia clara y sólida dentro de las prácticas de conservación en muchos países, donde la conservación se asocia con la injusticia del desalojo y el despojo de la población local. Además, sostiene que tratar de separar los lugares para su conservación no puede ser una solución sostenible ya que el sistema capitalista, que es el principal causante de la destrucción, no se detiene. En la segunda parte, Brockington explica cómo las políticas neoliberales han cambiado, reforzado o transformado la forma en que entendemos la Conservación, de modo que la conservación neoliberal intenta encontrar formas de reducir el medio ambiente a simples mercancías. Finalmente, en la tercera parte, hablamos sobre qué ha mejorado y qué cambios son necesarios en la Conservación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agrawal, Arun (1999). Greener pastures: Politics, markets, and community among a migrant pastoral people. Duke University Press.
  • Apostolopoulou, Elia; Anastasia Chatzimentor; Sara Maestre-Andrés; Marina Requena-i-Mora; Alejandra Pizarro y Dimitris Bormpoudakis (2021). Reviewing 15 years of research on neoliberal conservation: Towards a decolonial, interdisciplinary, intersectional and community-engaged research agenda. Geoforum, 124, 236-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.006
  • Balmford, Andrew; Aaron Bruner; Philip Cooper; Robert Costanza; Stephen Farber; Rhys E. Green; Martin Jenkins; Paul Jefferiss; Valma Jessamy; Joah Madden; Kat Munro; Norman Myers; Shahid Naeem; Jouni Paavola; Matthew Rayment Sergio Rosendo Joan Roughgarden; Kate Trumper y R. Kerry Turner (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 297(5583), 950-953. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073947
  • Blaikie, Piers (1993). What glasses are we wearing? Different views of environmental management. En C. Christiansson, A. Dahlberg, V. Loiske y W. Ostberg (eds.), Environment, Users, Scholars, Exploring Interfaces. ESDU Stockholm University.
  • Brockington, Dan y Jim Igoe (2006). Eviction for conservation: a global overview. Conservation and Society, 4(3), 424-470.
  • Brockington, Dan (2002). Fortress Conservation: the preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Indiana University Press.
  • Brockington, Dan; Rosaleen Duffy e Jim Igoe (2008). Nature unbound: conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. Routledge.
  • Büscher, Bram y Robert Fletcher (2020). The conservation revolution. Radical ideas for saving nature beyond the Anthropocene. Verso
  • Büscher, Bram; Kate Massarella; Robert Coates; Sierra Deutsch; Wolfram Dressler; W., Robert Fletcher; Marco Immovilli y Stasja Koot (2022). The convivial conservation imperative: exploring "Biodiversity Impact Chains" to support structural transformation. En I. Visseren-Hamakers y M. Kok (eds.), Transforming Biodiversity Governance (pp. 244-263). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856348.013
  • Büscher, Bram; Robert Fletcher; Dan Brockington; Chris Sandbrook; William M. Adams; Lisa Campbell; Catherine Corson; Wolfram Dressler; Rosaleen Duffy y Noella Gray (2017). Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications. Oryx, 51(3), 407-410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316001228
  • Galvin, Marc y Tobias Haller (2008). People, protected areas and global change: participatory conservation in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe (Vol. 3). University of Zurich
  • Green, Rhys E.; Stephen J. Cornell; Jörn P.W, Scharlemann y Andrew Balmford (2005). Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science, 307(5709), 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106049
  • Gutiérrez, David (2002). Metapoblaciones: un pilar básico en biología de conservación. Ecosistemas, 11(3): 1-3.
  • Hirsch, Fred (1977). The Social Limits to Growth. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Hulme, David y Marshall Murphree (2001). African wildlife and livelihoods: The promise and performance of community conservation. James Currey Ltd.
  • Igoe, Jim y Dan Brockington [2007] (2022). Conservación Neoliberal. Una breve introducción. Encrucijadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales, 22(1), r2201.
  • Ghimire, Kléber B. y Michel P. Pimbert (eds.) (1997). Social Change and Conservation. Earthscan.
  • Kiwango, Wilhelm A.; Hans C. Komakech; Thadeo M.C. Tarimo y Lawrence Martz (2015). Decentralized environmental governance: A reflection on its role in shaping wildlife management areas in Tanzania. Tropical Conservation Science, 8(4), 1080-1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800415
  • Kiwango, Wilhelm A.; Hans C. Komakech; Thadeo M.C. Tarimo y Lawrence Martz (2018). Levels of community participation and satisfaction with decentralized wildlife management in Idodi-Pawaga Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(3), 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1378750
  • Kosoy, Nicolás y Esteve Corbera (2010). Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological economics, 69(6), 1228-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002
  • Marx, Karl [1887] (1971). Capital. Volume One. Progress Publishers.
  • Murphree, Marshall W. (1993). Communities as resource management institutions. International Institute for Environment and Development.
  • Murphree, Marshall W. (2000). Boundaries and borders: the question of scale in the theory and practice of common property management. Paper presented to Eighth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomington (Indiana), May 31 - June 4.
  • Nash, Roderick (2001). Wilderness and the American Mind. Yale University Press.
  • Nelson, Fred (2021). Putting local communities at the centre of african conservation: a tribute to professor Marshall. currentconservation.org, 3 de diciembre, (enlace).
  • Neumann, Roderick P. (1998). Imposing wilderness: struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa (Vol. 4). University of California Press.
  • Oldekop, John. A., Katharine R. E. Sims; Birendra K. Karna; Mark J. Whittingham y Arun Agrawal (2019). Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal. Nature Sustainability, 2(5), 421-428. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0277-3
  • Ostrom, Elizabeth (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  • Requena-i-Mora, Marina y Dan Brockington (2021). Seeing environmental injustices: the mechanics, devices and assumptions of environmental sustainability indices and indicators. Journal of Political Ecology 28(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.4765
  • Robertson, Morgan (2006). The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: society and space, 24(3), 367-387. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3304
  • Stocking, Michael y Gerry Garland (1995). Land degradation and soil conservation: policy issues for a democratic South Africa. Africanus, 25(1), 27-35.
  • Stuit, Andrea; Dan Brockington y Esteve Corbera (2022). Smart, Commodified and Encoded. Conservation & Society, 20(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_41_21
  • Terbor, John (2004). Reflections of a Scientist on the World Parks Congress 2004. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 619-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.01837.x
  • Weiner, Douglas R. (1988). Models of Nature. Ecology, Conservation, and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. Indiana University Press.
  • Weiner, Douglas R. (1999). A Little Corner of Freedom. Russian Nature Protection from Stalin to Gorbachev. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • West, Patrick C. y Steven R. Brechin (1991). Resident Peoples and National Parks. University of Arizona Press.
  • Willis, K Katherine J.; L. Gillson y T.M. Brncic (2004). How" virgin" is virgi rainforest?. Science, 304(5669), 402-403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093991
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet