Capacidad de generar imágenes mentales motoras en bailarines profesionales y sujetos sedentarios

  1. Agudo-Carmona, Diego
  2. Daimiel-Yllera, Alicia
  3. Vaz-Torralba, Patricia
  4. Paris-Alemany, Alba
  5. Cuenca-Martínez, Ferran
  6. La Touche, Roy
Revista:
Journal of Move & Therapeutic Science

ISSN: 2695-6330

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Junio

Volumen: 2

Número: 1

Páginas: 77-86

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.37382/JOMTS.V2I1.18 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Move & Therapeutic Science

Resumen

Objetivo: El objetivo principal del presente estudio fue evaluar la capacidad de generar imágenes mentales motoras entre bailarines profesionales y sujetos sedentarios. El objetivo secundario fue evaluar la relación entre la capacidad de generar imágenes mentales motoras y la cronometría mental. Diseño: Estudio observacional transversal. Marco: Conservatorio Superior de Danza. Participantes: 60 participantes fueron divididos en dos grupos: bailarines profesionales (GB) (n = 30) y sujetos sedentarios (GC) (n = 30). Variables: La capacidad de generar imágenes mentales motoras se evaluó a través del cuestionario de imagen del movimiento (MIQ-R) así como de la cronometría mental. El nivel de actividad física se evaluó a través del cuestionario internacional de actividad física (IPAQ). Resultados: En relación con la capacidad de generar imágenes mentales motoras, se encontraron diferencias significativas inter-grupo en todas las variables analizadas (p < .05). Adicionalmente, las correlaciones más fuertes se encontraron en el GB, donde se halló una asociación negativa moderada entre la capacidad de generar imágenes mentales motoras y la cronometría mental (r = -.54). Conclusión: En base a los resultados obtenidos, se sugiere que los bailarines profesionales, presentan una mayor capacidad de generar imágenes mentales motoras que los sujetos sedentarios, empleando, además, un menor tiempo en el desarrollo de la práctica mental.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bunno Y, Suzuki T, Iwatsuki H. Motor imagery muscle contraction strength influences spinal motor neuron excitability and cardiac sympathetic nerve activity. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(12):3793–8
  • Callow N, Hardy L. The relationship between the use of kinaesthetic imagery and different visual imagery perspectives. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(2):167–77
  • Calmels C, Holmes P, Lopez E, Naman V. Chronometric Comparison of Actual and Imaged Complex Movement Patterns. J Mot Behav. 2006;38(5):339–48
  • Campos A, González MA. Spanish version of the revised movement image questionnaire (miq-r): psychometric properties and validation. Rev Psicol del Deport. 2010;19:263–73.
  • Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Decety J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res. 1996;77(1-2):45–52
  • Decety J, Jeannerod M, Germain M, Pastene J. Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort. Behav Brain Res. 1991;42(1):1–5.
  • Di Corrado D, Guarnera M, Quartiroli A. Vividness and Transformation of Mental Images in Karate and Ballet. Percept Mot Skills. 2014;119(3):764–73
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91
  • Feltz DL, Landers DM. The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. J Sport Psychol. 1983;25–57.
  • Frenkel M, Herzig D, Gebhard F, Mayer J, Becker C, Einsiedel T. Mental practice maintains range of motion despite forearm immobilization: A pilot study in healthy persons. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(3):225–32
  • Goss S, Hall C, Buckolz E, Fishburne G. Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Mem Cognit. Springer-Verlag; 1986;14(6):469–77
  • Grèzes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001;12(1):1–19.
  • Guillot A, Collet C. Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Res Rev. 2005a;50(2):387–97
  • Guillot A, Collet C. Duration of Mentally Simulated Movement: A Review. J Mot Behav. 2005b;37(1):10–20 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.37.1.10-20.
  • Guillot A, Collet C. Construction of the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;1(1):31–44
  • Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Source J Educ Stat. 1990;15(1):84–7.
  • Isaac AR, Marks DF. Individual differences in mental imagery experience: developmental changes and specialization. Br J Psychol. 1994;85:479–500.
  • Lebon F, Byblow WD, Collet C, Guillot A, Stinear CM. The modulation of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery depends on imagery quality. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;35(2):323–31
  • Lotze M, Montoya P, Erb M, Hülsmann E, Flor H, Klose U, Birbaumer N, Grodd W. Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999;11(5):491–501
  • Luft AR, Skalej M, Stefanou A, Klose U, Voigt K. Comparing motion- and imagery-related activation in the human cerebellum: a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(2):105–13.
  • Malouin F, Richards CL, Durand A, Doyon J. Reliability of Mental Chronometry for Assessing Motor Imagery Ability After Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(2):311–9
  • Papaxanthis C, Schieppati M, Gentili R, Pozzo T. Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(4):447–52
  • Parsons LM. Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994;20(4):709–30.
  • Peixoto Pinto T, Mello Russo Ramos M, Lemos T, Domingues Vargas C, Imbiriba LA. Is heart rate variability affected by distinct motor imagery strategies? Physiol Behav. 2017;177:189–95
  • Ranganath C. Working memory for visual objects: Complementary roles of inferior temporal, medial temporal, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience. 2006;139(1):277–89
  • Ridderinkhof KR, Brass M. How Kinesthetic Motor Imagery works: A predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise. J Physiol. 2015;109(1-3):53–63
  • Rieger M. Motor imagery in typing: effects of typing style and action familiarity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012;19(1):101–7
  • Roberts R, Callow N, Hardy L, Markland D, Bringer J. Movement Imagery Ability: Development and Assessment of a Revised Version of the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;30(2):200–21
  • Robin N, Dominique L, Toussaint L, Blandin Y, Guillot A, Her M Le. Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;5(2):175–86
  • Roman-Viñas B, Serra-Majem L, Hagströmer M, Ribas-Barba L, Sjöström M, Segura-Cardona R. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Reliability and validity in a Spanish population. Eur J Sport Sci. 2010;10(5):297–304
  • Sacco K, Cauda F, Cerliani L, Mate D, Duca S, Geminiani GC. Motor imagery of walking following training in locomotor attention. The effect of “the tango lesson.” Neuroimage. 2006;32(3):1441–9
  • Sakamoto M, Muraoka T, Mizuguchi N, Kanosue K. Combining observation and imagery of an action enhances human corticospinal excitability. Neurosci Res. 2009;65(1):23–7
  • Stephan KM, Fink GR, Passingham RE, Silbersweig D, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS. Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73(1):373–86.
  • Taube W, Mouthon M, Leukel C, Hoogewoud H-M, Annoni J-M, Keller M. Brain activity during observation and motor imagery of different balance tasks: An fMRI study. Cortex. 2015;64:102–14
  • Vogt S, Rienzo F Di, Collet C, Collins A, Guillot A. Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation. Front Hum Neurosci. Frontiers; 2013;7:807
  • Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9
  • Williams SE, Guillot A, Di Rienzo F, Cumming J. Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(8):703–11
  • Wilson M, Knoblich G. The Case for Motor Involvement in Perceiving Conspecifics. Psychol Bull. 2005;131(3):460–73
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet