Changes in response time and accuracy of laterality recognition tasks according to the age in healthy subjectsa cross-sectional study

  1. León Hernández, José Vicente
  2. Suso Martí, Luís
  3. La Touche, Roy
  4. Cuenca Martínez, Ferran
Revista:
Journal of Move & Therapeutic Science

ISSN: 2695-6330

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Diciembre

Volumen: 3

Número: 2

Páginas: 364-374

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.37382/JOMTS.V3I2.609 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Move & Therapeutic Science

Resumen

Objectives: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the laterality recognition of the body parts “hands”, “neck” and “feet” based on the response time and accuracy of left/right body-part judgments with performance compared across three age groups. The secondary objective was to calculate within age correlations between the time and accuracy variables and a measure of physical activity that provides activity in metabolic equivalents [METs]), and the METs score. Methods: A total sample of 154 healthy subjects was divided into three age groups: G1 (n = 58), G2 (n = 38), and G3 (n = 58). Response time and accuracy were measured with the application Recognise designed by the NOI Group for “hand”, “neck” and “feet” images. Results: The results showed significant changes between groups in accuracy and response time for all body parts. Post-hoc analysis revealed longest response time and worst accuracy for G3. In the correlation with METs analysis, the strongest correlations were found in G1, where there was a positive moderate association between the METs score and the accuracy for the right-hand images (r = 0.352) and right neck images (r = 0.398). Conclusion: Body-part laterality recognition is altered with age. Longer response time and lower accuracy was observed for “hands”, “neck” and “feet”.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Brady N, Maguinness C, Ní Choisdealbha Á. My Hand or Yours? Markedly Different Sensitivity to Egocentric and Allocentric Views in the Hand Laterality Task. Tsakiris M, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2011;6(8):e23316
  • Bray H, Moseley GL. Disrupted working body schema of the trunk in people with back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(3):168–73
  • Breckenridge JD, McAuley JH, Butler DS, Stewart H, Moseley GL, Ginn KA. The development of a shoulder specific left/right judgement task: Validity & reliability. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;28:39–45
  • Clark NC, Röijezon U, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 2: Clinical assessment and intervention. Man Ther. 2015;20(3):378–87
  • Conson M, Errico D, Mazzarella E, De Bellis F, Grossi D, Trojano L. Impact of body posture on laterality judgement and explicit recognition tasks performed on self and others’ hands. Exp brain Res. 2015;233(4):1331–8
  • Decety J. Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3(2):87–93.
  • Dror IE, Kosslyn SM. Mental imagery and aging. Psychol Aging. 1994;9(1):90–102.
  • Feng T, Zhang Z, Ji Z, Jia B, Li Y. Selective Effects of Sport Expertise on the Stages of Mental Rotation Tasks With Object-Based and Egocentric Transformations. Adv Cogn Psychol. University of Finance and Management in Warsaw; 2017;13(3):248–56
  • Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Wenderoth N, Van Impe A, Swinnen SP. Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: Degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(3):271–8
  • Gogos A, Gavrilescu M, Davison S, Searle K, Adams J, Rossell SL, Bell R, Davis SR, Egan GF. Greater superior than inferior parietal lobule activation with increasing rotation angle during mental rotation: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. Pergamon; 2010;48(2):529–35
  • Goss S, Hall C, Buckolz E, Fishburne G. Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Mem Cognit. Springer-Verlag; 1986;14(6):469–77
  • Hertzog C, Vernon MC, Rypma B. Age differences in mental rotation task performance: the influence of speed/accuracy tradeoffs. J Gerontol. 1993;48(3):P150-6.
  • Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Source J Educ Stat. 1990;15(1):84–7.
  • Jansen P, Lehmann J. Mental rotation performance in soccer players and gymnasts in an object-based mental rotation task. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2013;9(2):92–8
  • Jansen P, Pietsch S, Jansen P, Pietsch S. Physical Activity Improves Mental Rotation Performance. Creat Educ. Scientific Research Publishing; 2010;01(01):58–61
  • Jenkins L, Myerson J, Joerding JA, Hale S. Converging evidence that visuospatial cognition is more age-sensitive than verbal cognition. Psychol Aging. 2000;15(1):157–75.
  • Jongsma MLA, Meulenbroek RGJ, Okely J, Baas CM, van der Lubbe RHJ, Steenbergen B. Effects of hand orientation on motor imagery--event related potentials suggest kinesthetic motor imagery to solve the hand laterality judgment task. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2013;8(9):e76515
  • Lee NK, Kwon YH, Son SM, Nam SH, Kim JS. The effects of aging on visuomotor coordination and proprioceptive function in the upper limb. J Phys Ther Sci. Society of Physical Therapy Science; 2013;25(5):627–9
  • Linder M, Michaelson P, Röijezon U. Laterality judgments in people with low back pain - A cross-sectional observational and test-retest reliability study. Man Ther. Elsevier; 2016;21:128–33
  • Malouin F, Belleville S, Richards CL, Desrosiers J, Doyon J. Working memory and mental practice outcomes after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):177–83.
  • Moreau D. Unreflective actions? complex motor skill acquisition to enhance spatial cognition. Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2015;14(2):349–59
  • Moseley GL, Butler DS (David S, Beames TB, Giles TJ. The graded motor imagery handbook. Noigroup Publications; 2012.
  • Osuagwu BA, Vuckovic A. Similarities between explicit and implicit motor imagery in mental rotation of hands: An EEG study. Neuropsychologia. Pergamon; 2014;65:197–210
  • Parsons LM. Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994;20(4):709–30.
  • Parsons LM. Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001;107(1–3):155–81.
  • Ribeiro F, Oliveira J. Aging effects on joint proprioception: the role of physical activity in proprioception preservation. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2007;4(2):71–6
  • Rieger M. Motor imagery in typing: effects of typing style and action familiarity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012;19(1):101–7
  • Roman-Viñas B, Serra-Majem L, Hagströmer M, Ribas-Barba L, Sjöström M, Segura-Cardona R. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Reliability and validity in a Spanish population. Eur J Sport Sci. 2010;10(5):297–304
  • Saimpont A, Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C. Aging affects the mental rotation of left and right hands. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2009;4(8):e6714
  • Shenton JT, Schwoebel J, Coslett HB. Mental motor imagery and the body schema: evidence for proprioceptive dominance. Neurosci Lett. 2004;370(1):19–24
  • Spruijt S, Jongsma MLA, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B. Predictive models to determine imagery strategies employed by children to judge hand laterality. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126568
  • Takeda K, Shimoda N, Sato Y, Ogano M, Kato H. Reaction time differences between left- and right-handers during mental rotation of hand pictures. Laterality Asymmetries Body, Brain Cogn. Taylor & Francis Group ; 2010;15(4):415–25
  • Vannuscorps G, Pillon A, Andres M. Effect of biomechanical constraints in the hand laterality judgment task: where does it come from? Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:299
  • Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9
  • Wallwork SB, Butler DS, Fulton I, Stewart H, Darmawan I, Moseley GL. Left/right neck rotation judgments are affected by age, gender, handedness and image rotation. Man Ther. Elsevier; 2013;18(3):225–30
  • Weiss MM, Wolbers T, Peller M, Witt K, Marshall L, Buchel C, Siebner HR. Rotated alphanumeric characters do not automatically activate frontoparietal areas subserving mental rotation. Neuroimage. Academic Press; 2009;44(3):1063–73
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet