Sistemas de limpieza gelificados para pinturas acrílicas en emulsiónuna revisión de la literatura científica

  1. Irene Cardaba López 1
  2. Álvaro Solbes García 2
  1. 1 Gordailua, Centro de Colecciones Patrimoniales de Gipuzkoa
  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (México)
Revista:
Ge-conservación

ISSN: 1989-8568

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 20

Páginas: 337-351

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.37558/GEC.V20I1.1075 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ge-conservación

Resumen

Las pinturas acrílicas en emulsión acuosa se han utilizado en el arte de forma masiva desde los años 60. Sus propiedades ópticas y versatilidad posibilitaron su rápida incorporación al ámbito artístico, convirtiéndola en una de las técnicas más reconocibles a nivel internacional. Desde entonces, muchos artistas se han servido de estos productos sintéticos y sus derivados para realizar sus obras, conformando un gran acervo en fondos y colecciones que hoy en día presenta problemas de conservación. Lo más grave de esta situación es que los problemas identificados están intrínsecamente relacionados con su composición y propiedades de envejecimiento. En general, las películas acrílicas son muy sensibles a los solventes orgánicos y el agua, por lo que los métodos de limpieza tradicional no son adecuados para su intervención. Esta publicación pone en contexto parte relevante de la literatura científica referente a los nuevos métodos de limpieza basados en sistemas acuosos y gelificados.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANGELOVA, L; BERRIE, B.H.; GHETALDI, K.; KERR, A. ET WEISS, R.G. (2015). “Partially hydrolyzed poly(vinyl acetate)-borax-based gel-like materials for conservation of art: Characterization and applications” In Studies in Conservation, 60: 227-244 https://doi.org/10.1179/2047058413Y.0000000112
  • ANGELOVA, L.; CARRETI, E.; BERRIE, B.H.; WEISS, R.G. (2017). “Poly (vinyl alcohol)-borax “gels”: a flexible cleaning option” In Gels in the Conservation of Art, Angelova L. (coord.). Londres: Archetype Publications Ltd, 231.
  • AGARWAL, N. & FARRIS, R. J. (1999). «Water absorption by acrylic-based latex blend films and its effect on their properties», Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 72(11): 1407-1419.
  • ARAMENDIA, E. ET AL. (2003) «Distribution of surfactants near acrylic latex film surfaces: A comparison of conventional and reactive surfactants (surfmers)», Langmuir, 19(8): 3212-3221. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0267950
  • BAGLIONI, P.; BERTI, D.; BONINI, M.; CARRETI, E.; DEI, L.; FRATINI, E. ET GIGORGI, R. (2014). “Micelle, microemulsions and gels for the conservation of cultural heritage” In Advances in colloid and interface science, 205: 361-371 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2013.09.008
  • BELAROUI, F. ET AL. (2003). «Distribution of water-soluble and surface-active low-molecular-weight species in acrylic latex films», Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 261(2): 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00098-5
  • BERTASA, M., CHIANTORE, O., POLI, T.; RIEDO, C.; DI TULLIO, V.; CANEVALI, C.; SANSONETTI, A. ET SCALARONE, D. (2017) “A study of commercial agar gels as cleaning materials” In Gels in the Conservation of Art, Angelova L. (coord.). Londres: Archetype Publications Ltd, 11
  • BURNSTOCK, A. & VAN DEN BERG, K. J. (2005) «A pilot study of the effects of triammonium citrate solutions used for surface cleaning paintings», Postprints (American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. Paintings Specialty Group), 17: 56-64.
  • BUTLER, L. N., FELLOWS, C. M. Y GILBERT, R. G. (2003) «Water sensitivity of latex-based films», Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(3): 456-464. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020611v
  • CARDABA, I.; POGGI, G.; BAGLIONI, M.; CHELAZZI, D.; MAGUREGUI, I. ET GIORGI, R. (2020). “Assessment of aqueous cleaning of acrylic paints using innovative cryogels”, Microchemical Journal, 152: 104311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104311
  • CREMONESI, P. ET CASOLI, A. (2017). “Thermo-reversible rigid agar hydrogels: their properties and action in cleaning” In Gels in the Conservation of Art, Angelova L. (coord.). Londres: Archetype Publications Ltd, 19.
  • CROLL, S. (2007). «Overview of developments in the paint industry since 1930», In Learner, T. J. S. et al. (eds.) Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium. Getty Conservation Institute (Getty Conservation Institute symposium proceedings series), 17-29.
  • DIGNEY-PEER, S. ET AL. (2004). «The migration of surfactants in acrylic emulsion paint films», In Modern art, new museums: contributions to the Bilbao Congress, 13-17 September 2004, 202-207.
  • DILLON, C. E., LAGALANTE, A. F. Y WOLBERS, R. C. (2014) «Acrylic emulsion paint films: The effect of solution pH, conductivity, and ionic strength on film swelling and surfactant removal», Studies in Conservation, 59(1): 59-62. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047058412Y.0000000076
  • DIMOND, O.; BARKOVIC, M.; CROSS, M. ET ORMSBY, B. (2019). “The role of agar gel in treating water stains on acrylic paintings: Case study of Composition, 1963 by Justin Knowles” In Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 58: 144-157. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01971360.2019.1570431
  • DOHERTY, T. ET STAVROUDIS, C. (2012). “Desarrollando sistemas de limpieza para pinturas sensibles al agua mediante ajuste del pH y de la conductividad”. In Conservación de arte contemporáneo: 13ª jornadas, febrero 2012, Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Departamento de Conservación-Restauración, 39-48.
  • DOMÉNECH-CARBÓ, M. T. ET AL. (2013) «Multitechnique Approach to Evaluate Cleaning Treatments for Acrylic and Polyvinyl Acetate Paints», In New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings: Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute, 125-134.
  • FELLER, R. L. ET AL. (1993). Artists’ pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics, volume 2. Editado por A. Roy. National Gallery of Art.
  • HAGAN, E. ET AL. (2007). «Factors affecting the mechanical properties of modern paints», In Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium, 227-235.
  • HAGAN, E. W. S. ET AL. (2011). «Influence of the inorganic phase concentration and geometry on the viscoelastic properties of latex coatings through the glass-transition», Polymer, 52(7): 1662-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.01.060
  • HAGAN, E. W. S. ET AL. (2015). «The effects of strain rate and temperature on commercial acrylic artist paints aged one year to decades», Applied Physics A, 121(3): 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-015-9423-6
  • HAYES, J., GOLDEN, M. & SMITH, G. D. (2007). «From formulation to finished product: causes and potential cures for conservation concerns in acrylic emulsion paints», In Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium, 58-65.
  • HOGFELDT, E. ET AL. (1989). «Application of a simple three-parameter model to titration data for some linear polyelectrolytes», Acta Chem. Scand, 43(5): 496-499. https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.43-0496
  • HOOGLAND, F. G. Y BOON, J. J. (2009). «Analytical mass spectrometry of poly(ethylene glycol) additives in artists’ acrylic emulsion media, artists’ paints, and microsamples from acrylic paintings using MALDI-MS and nanospray-ESI-MS», International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 284(1-3): 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2009.03.002
  • JABLONSKI, E. ET AL. (2003). «Conservation concerns for acrylic emulsion paints», Reviews in conservation, 4: 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2003.48.Supplement-1.3
  • KAMPASAKALI, E. ET AL. (2011). «A preliminary study into the swelling behavior of artists’ acrylic emulsion paint films», In ICOM-CC 16th triennial conference Lisbon 19-23 September 2011: preprints.
  • KHANDEKAR, N (2000). “A survey of the conservation literature relating to the development of aqueous gel cleaning on painted and varnished surfaces” In Reviews in conservation, IIC, London, 1: 10-20 https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2000.45.s3.003
  • LEARNER, T. (2004). Analysis of modern paints. Getty Publications.
  • LEÓN, T. L. (2006). Efectos Hofmeister en partículas coloidales. Editorial de la Universidad de Granada.
  • MALLÉGOL, J. ET AL. (2002). «Origins and effects of a surfactant excess near the surface of waterborne acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives», Langmuir, 18(11): 4478-4487. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0117698
  • MECKLENBURG, M. F. & TUMOSA, C. S. (1991). «An Introduction into the Mechanical Behavior of Paintings under Rapid Loading Conditions», In Art in Transit: Studies in the Transport of Paintings, 137-171.
  • MORRISON, R. ET AL. (2007) «An Investigation of Parameters for the Use of Citrate Solutions for Surface Cleaning Unvarnished Paintings», Studies in Conservation, 52(4): 255-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20619514
  • MURRAY, A. ET AL. (2002) «The condition and cleaning of acrylic emulsion paintings», In Materials issues in art and archaeology VI: symposium held November 26-30, 2001, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 83-90.
  • ORMSBY, B. A. ET AL. (2009) «An FTIR-based exploration of the effects of wet cleaning treatments on artists’ acrylic emulsion paint films», e Preservation Science, 6: 186-195. http://aata.getty.edu/Record
  • ORMSBY, B.; LEARNER, T.; SCHILLING, M.; DRUZIK, J.; KHANJIAN, H. ET FOSTER, G. (2006). “The effects of surface cleaning on acrylic emulsion paintings: a preliminary investigation” In Tate Papers [Tate’s Online Research Journal] 6: 1–14. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/06/effects-of-surface-cleaning-on-acrylic-emulsion-painting-preliminary-investigation
  • ORMSBY, B. A ET AL. (2007) «Wet cleaning acrylic emulsion paint films: an evaluation of physical, chemical, and optical changes», Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium, 189-200.
  • ORMSBY, B. & LEARNER, T. (2009) «The effects of wet surface cleaning treatments on acrylic emulsion artists’ paints: a review of recent scientific research», Reviews in conservation, 10(10): 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2010.55.Supplement-1.29
  • ORMSBY, B.; SOLDANO, A.; KEEFE, M. H.; PHENIX, A. ET LEARNER, T. (2010). “An Empirical Evaluation of a Range of Cleaning Agents for Removing Dirt from Artists’ Acrylic emulsion Paints” In AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints, 23: 77-87.
  • ORMSBY, B. & LEARNER, T. (2014). «Artists’ acrylic emulsion paints: materials, meaning and conservation treatment options», AICCM bulletin, 34: 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1179/bac.2013.34.1.007
  • ORMSBY, B.; LEARNER, T.; FOSTER, G.; DRUZIK, J. ET SCHILLING, M. (2007). “Wet-cleaning acrylic emulsion paint films: an evaluation of physical, chemical, and optical changes” In Modern Paints Uncovered: Proceedings from the Modern Paints Uncovered Symposium, T.J.S. Learner,P. Smithen, J.W. Krueger, M.R. Schilling (Eds.), Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, California,189–200.
  • OWEN, L., PLOEGER, R. & MURRAY, A. (2004). «The effects of water exposure on surface characteristics of acrylic emulsion paints», Journal of the Canadian Association for Conservation = Journal de l’Association canadienne pour la conservation et la restauration, 29(613): 8-25.
  • PLOEGER, R. ET AL. (2005).«An investigation of the chemical changes of artists’ acrylic paint films when exposed to water», In Materials issues in art and archaeology VII: symposium held November 30-December 3, 2004, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A., 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-852-OO3.4.
  • PLOEGER, R. ET AL. (2007). «Morphological changes and rates of leaching of water-soluble material from artists’ acrylic paint films during aqueous immersions», Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium, 201-207.
  • PLOEGER, R. E. ET AL. (2004). «Infrared analysis of materials leached by water from acrylic paint films», Proceedings of the Sixth Infrared and Raman Users Group (IRUG), 46-51.
  • RIEDO, C.; ROLLO, G.; SCALARONE, D. ET CHIANTORE, O. (2017). “Improved PVA gels for the cleaning of painted surfaces”. In Gels in the Conservation of Art, Angelova L. (coord.). Londres: Archetype Publications Ltd, 283
  • SAULNIER, G. ET TTHIBAULT, M.E. (2005). “Cleaning Acrylic Emulsion Paints: A two-part study” In AIC PSG Postprints, Portland, Oregon, 17: 1- 8
  • SANSONETTI, A.; BERTASA, M.; CANEVALI, C.; RABBOLINI, A.; ANZANI, M. ET SCALARONE, D. (2020). “A review in using agar gels for cleaning art surfaces” In Journal of Cultural Heritage, 44: 285-296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.01.008
  • SCALARONE, D. & CHIANTORE, O. (2004). «Separation techniques for the analysis of artists’ acrylic emulsion paints», Journal of Separation Science, 27(4): 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200301638
  • SMITH, G. D. (2007) «Aging characteristics of a contemporary acrylic emulsion used in artists’ paints», en Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium, 236-246.
  • SMITHEN, P. (2007). «A history of the treatment of acrylic painting», In Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium, 165-174.
  • SNUPAREK, J. ET AL. (1983). «Water Absorption in Acrylic Latex Films.», Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 28(4): 1421-1428.
  • DE SOUSA RAMOS FÉLIX SILVA, M. (2011). Analytical study of accelerated light ageing and cleaning effects on acrylic and PVAc dispersion paints used in Modern and Contemporary Art. Universitat Politècnica de València.
  • SOLBES-GARCIA, A.; MIRANDA-VIDALES, J.M.; NIETO-VILLENA, A.; HERNANDEZ, L.S. ET NARVÁEZ, L. (2017). “Evaluation of the oxalic and tartaric acids as an alternative to citric acid in aqueous cleaning systems for the conservation of contemporary acrylic paintings”, en Journal of Cultural Heritage, 25: 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.11.013
  • STAVROUDIS, C. Y DOHERTY, T. (2013). “The Modular Cleaning Program in Practice : Application to Acrylic Paintings”, en New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings: Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute, 139-145.
  • TSANG, J.S. Y BABO, S. (2011). Soot removal from acrylic emulsion paint test panels: a study of dry and non-contact cleaning, en ICOM Committee for Conservation 16th Triennial Meeting Lisbon Portugal 19-23 September 2011
  • WHITMORE, P. M. Y COLALUCA, V. G. (1995). «The natural and accelerated aging of an acrylic artists’ medium.», Studies in conservation, 40(1): 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1995.40.1.51
  • WHITMORE, P. M., COLALUCA, V. G. Y FARRELL, E. (1996). «A note on the origin of turbidity in films of an artist’s acrylic paint medium», Studies in conservation, 41(4): 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1996.41.4.250
  • WHITMORE, P. M., MORRIS, H. R. Y COLALUCA, V. G. (2007). «Penetration of liquid water through waterborne acrylic coatings», en Learner, T. J. S. et al. (eds.) Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium. Getty Conservation Institute (Getty Conservation Institute symposium proceedings series), 217-223.
  • WICKS, Z. W. ET AL. (2007). Organic coatings: science and technology, Third edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Disponible en: http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-in/doilookup/?10.1021/ie50472a014.
  • WOLBERS, R. C., NORBUTUS, A. Y LAGALANTE, A. (2012). «Cleaning of Acrylic Emulsion Paints: Preliminary Extractive Studies with Two Commercial Paint Systems», Smithsonian Contributions to Museum Conservation 2, 3(November 2010), 148-157.
  • ZHANG, Y. Y CREMER, P. S. (2006). «Interactions between macromolecules and ions: the Hofmeister series», Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 10(6): 658-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.020
  • ZIRALDO, I., KRISTEN WATTS, ARNOLD LUK, ANTHONY F. LAGALANTE & RICHARD C. WOLBERS (2016) The influence of temperature and humidity on swelling and surfactant migration in acrylic emulsion paint films, Studies in Conservation, 61(4): 209-221 https://doi.org/10.1179/2047058414Y.0000000156
  • ZUMBÜHL, S. ET AL. (2007) .«Solvent action on dispersion paint systems and the influence on the morphology: changes and destruction of the latex microstructure», en Learner, T. J. S. et al. (eds.) Modern paints uncovered: proceedings from the modern paints uncovered symposium. Getty Conservation Institute (Getty Conservation Institute symposium proceedings series), 257-268.