Dofirms benefit from interactions with public research organisationsbeyond innovation?an analysis of smallfirms

Referencias bibliográficas

• Arza, V. (2010). Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowl-edge transfer: A conceptual framework inspired by Latin America.Science and Pub-lic Policy,37(7), 473–484
• Barge-Gil, A. (2010a). Open, semi-open and closed innovators. Towards an explanationof degree of openness.Industry and Innovation,17(6), 577–607.
• Barge-Gil, A. (2010b). Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: Anempirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior.Technovation,30(3), 195–206.
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D andfirm performance.Research Policy,33(10), 1477–1492.
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B., & Sastre, J. F. (2015). Inter-temporal patterns ofR&D collaboration and innovative performance.The Journal of Technology Transfer,40(1), 123–137.
• Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., & Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisationalmodes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratoryan alisis.Technovation,31(1), 22–33.
• Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowl-edge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation.Journal of Man-agement Studies,46(3), 481–509.
• Bishop, K., D'Este, P., & Neely, A. (2011). Gaining from interactions with universities:Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity.Research Policy,40(1), 30–40.
• Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Open Innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internalorganizational facilitators.Journal of Small Business Management,53, 1241–1263.
• Chams-Anturi, O., Moreno-Luzon, M., & Escorcia-Caballero, J. (2019). Linking organiza-tional trust and performance through ambidexterity.Personnel Review, https: Doi.org (10.1108(PR-07-2018-0239).
• Chesbrough, H. (2003).Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profitingfrom technology. Harvard Business School Press.
• Chiambaretto, P., Bengtsson, M., Fern andez, A.-. S., & N€asholm, M. (2020). Small andlargefirms’trade-off between benefits and risks when choosing a coopetitor forinnovation.Long Range Planning,53,(1) 101876.
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and Impacts: The influence ofpublic research on industrial R&D.Management Science,48(1), 1–23.
• Corolleur, C. D., Carrere, M., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Turning scientific and technolog-ical human capital into economic capital: The experience of biotech start-ups inFrance.Research Policy,33(4), 631–642.
• Cosh, A., & Huhges, A. (2010). Never mind the quality feel the width: University-indus-try links and governmentfinancial support for innovation in small high-technol-ogy business in the UK and the USA.Journal of Technology Transfer,35(1), 66–91.
• CSIC (2012). Memoria anual del csic 2011. madrid: consejo superior de investigacionescientíficas.
• Dias, J., & Magri ̧co, V. M. (2011). The impact of resource conditions and environmentaluncertainty on inter-firm alliance strategies.Applied Economics,43(6), 757–765.
• Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competi-tive advantage.Management Science,35(12), 1504–1511.
• DIUS (2008).Annual innovation report. UK: Department for Business Innovation andSkills.
• Dutr enit, G., De Fuentes, C., & Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between publicresearch organisations and industry and benefits for both agents: Evidence fromMexico.Science and Public Policy,37(7), 513–526.
• Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2014). The global innovation index 2014:the human factor in innovation. Fountainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva. European Commission (2014). Innovation union scoreboard. Belgium
• Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration andinnovation: Toward a portfolio approach.Journal of Product Innovation Manage-ment,22(3), 238–250.
• Feller, I., Ailes, C. P., & Roessner, J. D. (2002). Impacts of research universities on techno-logical innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers.Research Policy,31(3), 457–474.
• Finkelstein, S. (1997). Interindustry merger patterns and resource dependence: A replicationand extension of Pfeffer (1972).Strategic Management Journal,18(10), 787–810.
• Freitas, I. M. B., & Verspagen, B. (2017). The motivations, institutions and organizationof university-industry collaborations in the Netherlands.Journal of EvolutionaryEconomics,1, 34.
• Fuentes, C., & Dutr enit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia-industry interaction forlong term Benefit.Research Policy,4, 1666–1682.
• Garrette, B., Casta~ner, X., & Dussauge, P. (2009). Horizontal alliances as an alternative toautonomous production: Product expansion mode choice in the worldwide aircraftindustry 1945−2000.Strategic Management Journal,30(8), 885–894.
• Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2017). Organizing for knowledge generation: Internalknowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing.Strategic Management Journal,38(2), 395–414.
• Guzzini, E., & Iacobucci, D. (2017). Project failures and innovation performancein university−firm collaborations.The Journal of Technology Transfer,42(4), 865–883.
• Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commer-cial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965−1988.Review ofEconomics and Statistics,80(1), 119–127.
• Herv as-Oliver, J., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2019). SMEopen innovation for process development: Understanding process-dedicatedexternal knowledge sourcing.Journal of Small Business Management,58(2), 409–445. doi:10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072.
• Huizingh, E. K. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives.Tech-novation,31(1), 2–9.
• Johnson, S., Webber, D. J., & Thomas, W. (2007). Which SMEs use external businessadvice? A multivariate subregional study.Environment and Planning A,39(8), 1981.
• Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open inno-vation.R&D Management,39(4), 331–341.
• Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediatednetwork model.Research policy,39(2), 290–300
• .Lorentzen, J. (2009). Learning byfirms: The black box of South Africas innovation sys-tem.Science and Public Policy,36(1), 33–45.
• Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update ofempiricalfindings.Research policy,26(7), 773–776.
• Mazzanti, M., Montresor, S., & Pini, P. (2009). What drives (or hampers) outsourcing?Evidence for a local production system in Emilia Romagna.Industry and Innovation,16(3), 331–365.
• Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An inte-grated framework of an alisis.Research Policy,32(8), 1481–1499.
• Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurialfirms: Sharing thelaboratory life.Research Policy,33(4), 643–659.
• Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in theface of globalisation.Technovation,24(2), 153–161.
• Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996).Applied linear statis-tical methods. Chicago: Irwin.
• N u~nez-S anchez, R., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego-Rico, A. (2012). Performance of knowl-edge interactions between public research centres and industrialfirms in Spain: Aproject-level an alisis.The Journal of Technology Transfer,37(3), 330–354.
• OECD (2003). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposedstandard practise for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris.OECD (2014).
• OECD economic surveys. Spain: OECD.
• Olmos-Pe~nuela, J., García-Granero, A., Castro-Martínez, E., & DEste, P. (2017). Strength-ening SMEs innovation culture through collaborations with public research organi zations. Do allfirms benefit equally?European Planning Studies,25(11), 1–20.
• Olmos-Pe~nuela, J., Molas-Gallart, J., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2014). Informal collabora-tions between social sciences and humanities researchers and non-academic part-ners.Science and Public Policy,41(4), 493–506.
• Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University−industry relationships and open innova-tion: Towards a research agenda.International Journal of Management Reviews,9(4), 259–280.
• Pittz, T. G., Intindola, M. L., Adler, T., Rogers, S., & Gard, C. (2019). Collaborating smartly:The role of open strategy in absorptive capacity.Journal of Small Business Manage-ment,57(4), 1595–1615.
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Prob-lems and prospects.Journal of Management,12(4), 531–544.
• Putnam, R. D. (2001).Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community.Simon and Schuster.
• Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and successin innovation: Evidence from France and Germany.Research Policy,42(1), 149–166.
• Rogers, M. (2004). Networks,firm size and innovation.Small Business Economics,22,141–153.
• Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in indus-try−university interactions.Research policy,31(7), 1163–1180.
• Shaver, J., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economics,firm heterogeneity, and foreigndirect investment in the United States.Strategic Management Journal,21,1175–1993.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizationalpractices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An explor-atory study.Research Policy,32,27–48.
• Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integra-tion, collaboration, licensing and public policy.Research Policy,15(6), 285–305.
• Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry−university links: Sourcing knowledgefor innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public sci-ence-base.Research Policy,37(6), 1079–1095 . Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical an alisis.Research Policy,31(6), 947–967.
• Un, C. A., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Asakawa, K. (2010). R&D Collaborations and ProductInnovation.Journal of Product Innovation Management,27(5), 673–689.
• Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Openinnovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges.Technovation,29(6), 423–437.
• Vega-Jurado, J., Guti errez-Gracia, A., & Fern andez-de-Lucio, I. (2009). Does externalknowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanishmanufacturing industry.Industrial and corporate change,18(4), 637–670.
• Vega-Jurado, J., Kask, S., & Manjarr es-Henríquez, L. (2017). University industry linksand product innovation: Cooperate or contract?Journal of Technology Managementand Innovation,12(3), 1–8.
• Vega-Jurado, J., Manjarr es-Henríquez, L., Fern andez-de-Lucio, I., & Naranjo-Africano, G.(2020). A virtuous circle? The effects of university−industry relationships in aregion with low absorptive capacity.Science and Public Policy, scaa030, 10.1093/scipol/scaa030
• Veugelers, R. (1998). Collaboration in R&D: An assessment of theoretical and empiricalfindings.The Economist,146(3), 419–443.
• Vivas-Augier, C., & Barge-Gil, A. (2015). Impact onfirms of the use of knowledge exter-nal sources: A systematic review of the literatura.Journal of Economic Surveys,29(5), 943–964.
• Xia, T., & Roper (2016). Unpacking open innovation: Absorptive capacity, exploratoryand exploitative openness, and the growth of entrepreneurial biopharmaceutical.Journal of Small Business Management,54(3), 931–952