Apelación y atenuacióncomparación intergenética entre juicios orales y debates parlamentarios españoles

  1. Cristina Villalba 1
  2. Beate Kern
  1. 1 Universidad de Valencoa
Revue:
RLA: Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada

ISSN: 0033-698X 0718-4883

Année de publication: 2017

Número: 55

Pages: 169-195

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: RLA: Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada

Résumé

This study analyses forms of address that may play a mitigating role in formal contexts. More specifically, it focuses on nominal forms of address (such as señoría) and conventionalised formulas (such as mira). To that end, the research is based on corpora for two genres of formal oral language: parliamentary debate and oral trials. An analysis of the data taking into consideration the function (preventive or reparative) of the mitigating device, its position, the illocutionary force of the speech act as well as the roles of the speakers showed that these mechanisms can adopt mitigation-related strategic values even in formal contexts. The paper also highlights the benefits of intergeneric studies, noting that they contribute to a more precise understanding of how mitigation plays out in different contexts and that a comparative approach to the study of pragmatic phenomena might help add new details for the characterization of the genres.