Comunicar y compararla historia de la ciencia ante el localismo, la fragmentación y la hegemonía cultural

Referencias bibliográficas

• Amsterdamska, Olga, Hiddinga, Anja. (2004). Locating Medical History: The Stories and Their Meanings. The Johns Hopkins University Press. BaltimoreLondon.
• Barona, Vilar, Lluís, Josep. (1994). Ciencia e Historia: Debates y tendencias en la historiografía de la ciencia. Seminari d'Estudis sobre la Ciència. València.
• Basalla, George. (1992). Reseña de An Encyclopaedia of the History of Technology de Ian McNeil. Isis. 83. 115
• Bloch, Marc. (1954). The Historian's Craft. Manchester University Press. Manchester.
• Boettcher, S. Forum: Transnationalism. January.
• Bonah, Christian. (2002). Experimental Rage': The Development of Medical Ethics and the Genesis of Scientific Facts. Social History of Medicine. 15. 187-207
• Response to the Announcement of the Languages Review.
• Bujosa, F. (1990). Nouveaux enjeux de l'histoire de la médecine. Institut Pasteur. Strasbourg.
• Buklijas, Tatiana, Lafferton, Emese. (2007). Science, medicine and nationalism in the Habsburg Empire from the 1840s to 1918. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38. 679-686
• Canny, Nicholas. (2009). Atlantic History: A Critical Appraisal. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
• Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. (2001). How to write the history of the New World: histories, epistemologies, and identities in the eighteenth-century Atlantic world. Stanford University Press. Stanford.
• Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. (2004). Renaissance Iberian Science: Ignored How Much Longer?. Perspectives on Science. 12. 86-125
• Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. (2006). Nature, Empire, and Nation: Explorations of the History of Science in the Iberian World. Stanford University Press. Stanford.
• Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. (2006). Puritan conquistadors: Iberianizing the Atlantic, 1550-1700. Stanford University Press. Stanford.
• Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge, Seeman, Erik R. (2007). The Atlantic in Global History, 1500-2000. Pearson Prentice Hall. ^eUpper Saddle River Upper Saddle River.
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
• Chang, Hasok. (2004). Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford University Press. New York.
• Chartier, Roger. (1984). Understanding Popular Culture. Mouton Publishers. Berlin.
• Christie, Jon. (1993). Aurora, Nemesis and Clio. British Journal for the History of Science. 26. 391-405
• Cohen, Deborah, O'Connor, Maura. (2004). Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective. Routledge. New YorkLondon.
• Crawford, Elisabeth. (1992). Nationalism and Internationalism in Science, 1880-1939. Four Studies of the Nobel Population. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
• Cueto, Marcos. (1989). Excelencia científica en la periferia: Actividades científicas e investigación biomédica en el Perú, 1890-1950. Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo GradeConcytec. Lima.
• Cueto, Marcos, Zamora, Víctor. (2006). Historia, Salud y Globalización. Universidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaInstituto de Estudios Peruanos. Lima.
• Cunningham, A, Williams, P. (1993). De-centring the 'big picture': The Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science. British Journal for the History of Science. 26. 407-432
• Curthoys, Ann, Lake, Marilyn. (2005). Connected Worlds: History in Transnational Perspective. Australian National University E Press. Canberra.
• Darnton, R. (1990). The kiss of Lamourette / reflections in cultural history. Faber & Faber. London.
• Dearing, R, King, L. The Languages Review.
• Detienne, Marcel. (2002). L'art de construire des comparables.Entre historiens et anthropologues. Critique Internationale. 14. 68-78
• Dolby, R. G. A. (1977). The Transmission of Science. History of Science. 15. 1-43
• Elliott, John Huxtable. (1991). National and Comparative History. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
• Espagne, Michel. (1999). Les transferts culturels franco-allemands. PUF. Paris.
• Espagne, Michel, Middell, M. Geschichte. Transnational.
• Espagne, Michel, Werner, Michael. (1987). La construction d'une référence culturelle allemande en France, genèse et histoire. Annales ESC. 42. 969
• (2007). European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH). European Science Foundation. Strasbourg.
• (2007). ERIH Initial List: History and Philosophy of Science (2007). European Science Foundation. Strasbourg.
• Fredrikson, George. (1980). The Past before Us: Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States. Cornell University Press. IthacaLondon.
• Findlen, P. (2005). The Two Cultures of Scholarship. Isis. 96. 230
• Fleck, Ludwik. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Fleck, Ludwik. (1983). Genesi e sviluppo di un fatto scientifico. Il Mulino. Bologna.
• Fleck, Ludwik. (1986). La génesis y el desarrollo de un hecho científico: Introducción a la teoría del estilo de pensamiento y del colectivo de pensamiento. Alianza. Madrid.
• Fleck, Ludwik. (2005). Genèse et développement d'un fait scientifique. Les Belles Lettres. Paris.
• Fara, Patricia. (2009). Science: A Four Thousand Year History. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
• Informe sobre la investigación en Humanidades. Panel de Historia. 132025
• (2006). White paper on research in the Humanities. Fecyt. Madrid.
• Forman, Paul, Heilbron, John L, Weart, Spencer. (1975). Physics circa 1900. Personnel, Funding, and Productivity of the Academic Establishments. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences. 5. 1-185
• Fox, Robert. (2006). Fashioning the Discipline: History of Science in the European Intellectual Tradition. Minerva. 44. 410-432
• Fyfe, Aileen. (2005). Reseña de The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science de John L. Heilbron, ed. British Journal for the History of Science. 38. 349
• Garber, Elizabeth. (1990). Beyond History of Science. Essays in Honor of Robert E. Schofield. Lehigh University Press. Bethlehem.
• Gavroglu, Kostas. (2008). Science and Technology in the European Periphery. Some historiographical reflections. History of Science. 46. 153-175
• Geison, G. L, Holmes, F. L. (1993). Research Schools. Historical Reappraisals. Osiris. 8. 227-238
• Gillispie, Charles C. (1991). Review: Scholarship Epitomized. Isis. 82. 94
• Gillispie, Charles C. (1960). The edge of objectivity: an essay in the history of scientific ideas. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
• Gil-Pérez, D. (1999). ¿Puede hablarse de consenso constructivista en la educación científica?. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. 17. 503-512
• Gil-Pérez, D. (2002). Defending constructivism in science education. Science & Education. 11. 557-571
• Glick, Thomas F, Pi-Sunyer, Oriol. (1969). Acculturation as an Explanatory Concept in Spanish History. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 11. 136-154
• Golinski, J. (1998). Making Natural Knowledge. Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
• Gross, Robert A. (2000). The Transnational Turn: Rediscovering American Studies in a Wider World. Journal of American Studies. 34. 373
• Hakfoort, Casper. (1991). The Missing Syntheses in the Historiography of Science. History of Science. 29. 209-216
• Harris, Steven J. (1998). Introduction: Thinking Locally, Acting Globally. Configurations. 6. 131-139
• Harwood, Jonathan. (1986). Review: Ludwik Fleck and the Sociology of Knowledge. Social Studies of Science. 16. 173-187
• Heilbron, John L. Science as a subject of history.
• Hiltgarner, Stephen. (1990). The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses. Social Studies of Science. 20. 519
• Holmes, F. L. (1993). Chemical Sciences in the Modern World. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia.
• Homburg, Ernst. (2008). Boundaries and audiences of national histories of science: insights from the history of science and technology of the Netherlands. Nuncius. 23. 309
• Hughes, Thomas P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. The John Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.
• Iriye, Akira. (2004). Transnational History. Contemporary European History. 13. 211
• Jacob, Margareth C. (1999). Beyond the cultural turn: new directions in the study of society and culture, editado por Victoria E. Bonnell y Lynn Hunt. University of California Press. Berkeley.
• Jeanneney, Jean-Noël. (2007). Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge. A view from Europe. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Kohler, Robert. (2005). A Generalist's Vision. Isis. 96. 224
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Kuhn, T. S. (1971). La Estructura de las Revoluciones Científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México, D. F.
• Lenoir, Timothy. (1984). Reseña de Ludwik Fleck: Erfahrung und Tatsache de Lothar Shäfer y Thomas Schnelle (eds.). Isis. 75. 724
• Lewison, Grant. (2001). Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine. Research Evaluation. 10. 89-95
• Lloyd, G. E. R. (1997). The Comparative History of Pre-Modern Science: The Pitfalls and the Prizes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 28. 363-368
• López Piñero, J. M. (1992). La historia de la ciencia como disciplina. Saber Leer. 55. 8-9
• López Piñero, J. M. (1993). Mundialización de la ciencia y cultura nacional. Ediciones Doce Calles. Madrid.
• Löwy, Ilana. (2007). The Social History of Medicine: Beyond the local. Social History of Medicine. 20. 465-481
• Maalouf, Amin. (2004). Identidades Asesinas. Alianza. Madrid.
• Maalouf, Amin. (2009). Le dérèglement du monde. Bernard Grasset. Paris.
• Mcevoy, John G. (2007). Modernism, postmodernism and the historiography of science. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences. 37. 383-408
• Morrell, J. B. (1972). The Chemist Breeders: The Research Schools of Liebig and Thomas Thomson. Ambix. 19. 1-46
• Navarro Brotóns, Víctor, Eamon, William. (2007). Más allá de la Leyenda Negra: España y la Revolución Científica / Beyond the Black Legend: Spain and the Scientific Revolution. Instituto de Historia de la CienciaDocumentación López Piñero. Valencia.
• Needham, J. (1979). The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West. University of Toronto Press. BuffaloNY.
• Nieto-Galan, Agustí. (1999). The Sciences in the European Periphery During the Enlightenment. Kluwer Academic Publishers. DordrechtBostonLondon.
• Nieto-Galan, Agustí. (2008). The History of Science in Spain. A Critical Overview. Nuncius. 211-236
• Numbers, Ronald L. (2009). The American History of Science Society or the International History of Science Society? The Fate of Cosmopolitanism since George Sarton. Isis. 100. 103-107
• O'Brien, Patrick. (2006). Historiographical traditions and modern imperatives for the restoration of global history. Journal of Global History. 1. 3-39
• Olby, Robert. (1990). Companion to the history of modern science. Routledge. London.
• Olesko, K. (2006). Science Pedagogy as a Category of Historical Analysis: Past, Present, and Future. Science and Education. 15. 863-880
• Oudshoorn, Nelly, Trevor, Pinch. (2003). How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies. The MIT Press. Cambridge.
• Palladino, P, Worboys, M. (1993). Science and Imperialism. Isis. 84. 91-102
• Pickstone, John V. (1993). Ways of knowing: towards a historical sociology of science, technology and medicine. British Journal for the History of Science. 26. 433-458
• ckstone, John V. (2000). Ways of knowing: a new history of science, technology and medicine. Manchester University Press. Manchester.
• Pickstone, John V. (2005). Review Article: Medical History as a Way of Life. Social History of Medicine. 18. 307-323
• Pickstone, John V. (2007). Working Knowledges Before and After circa 1800: Practices and Disciplines in the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine. Isis. 98. 489-516
• Pyenson, L. (2002). Comparative History of Science. History of Science. 40. 1-33
• Quirke, Viviane. (2007). Collaboration in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Changing Relationships in Britain and France,1935-1965. Routledge. LondonNew York.
• Raina, Dhruv. (2003). Images and Contexts: The History of Science and Modernity in India. Oxford University Press. Delhi.
• Raj, Kapil. (2007). Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Scientific Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650-1900. Macmillan. Basingstoke.
• Rosenkrantz, Barbara Gutmann. (1981). Review of Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact by Ludwik Fleck. Isis. 72. 96
• Rossi, Paolo. (1986). I ragni e le formiche: una apologia della storia della scienza. Il Mulino. Bologna.
• Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Scientists in the Classroom: the Cold War Reconstruction of American Science Education. BasingstokePalgave. New York.
• Rudwick, Martin J. S. (2005). Bursting the limits of time: the reconstruction of geohistory in the age of revolution. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Rudwick, Martin J. S. (1981). Review: Critical Problems in the History of Science. Isis. 72. 267-283
• Sabra, Abdelhamid I. (1987). The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek Science in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement. History of Science. 25. 223-243
• Sachse, Carola, Walker, Mark. (2005). Politics and Science in Wartime: Comparative International Perspectives on the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute. Osiris. 20.
• Saussy, Haun. (2006). Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, editado por Haun Saussy. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.
• Secord, James A. (1993). The Big Picture. Introduction. British Journal for the History of Science. 26. 387-483
• Secord, James A. (2000). Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Secord, James A. (2004). Knowledge in Transit. Isis. 95. 654-672
• Secord, James A. (2007). Science in the Marketplace. University Press. Chicago.
• Seigel, Micol. (2005). Beyond Compare: Comparative Method after the Transnational Turn. Radical History Review. 91. 62-90
• Sewell, W. H. (1967). Marc Bloch and the Logic of Comparative History. History and Theory. 6. 208-218
• Shigeru, Nakayama. (1995). History of East Asian Science: Needs and Opportunities. Osiris. 10. 80-94
• Europeans and their Languages. Eurobarometer.
• Thomas, R. Murray. (1990). International Comparative Education: Practices, Issues & Prospects. Pergamon Press. Oxford.
• Topham, Jonathan R. (2009). opularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800-2000. Ashgate. Aldershot.
• Topham, Jonathan R. (2000). Scientific Publishing and the Reading of Science in Nineteenth-Century Britain: A Historiographical Survey and Guide to Sources. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 31. 559-612
• Trenn, Thadeus J. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Vleuten, Erik van der, Kaijser, Arne. (2006). Networking Europe: Transnational Infrastructures and the Shaping of Europe, 1850-2000. Science History Publications.
• Walker, Mark. (2003). Science and Ideology: A Comparative History. Routledge. LondonNew York.
• Warner, John Harley. (2004). Grand Narrative and its Discontents: Medical History and the Social Tranformation of American Medicine. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 29. 757-780
• Warner, John Harley. (1995). The History of Science and the Sciences of Medicine. Osiris. 10. 164-193
• Wastiau-Schlüter, Patricia. (2005). Foreign Language Learning: A European Priority. Eurydyce. 2. 1-4
• Werner, Michael, Zimmermann, Bénédicte. (2006). Beyond Comparison: Histoire Croisée and the Challenge of Reflexivity. History and Theory. 45. 30-50
• Worboys, Michael. (1994). The Comparative History of Sleeping Sickness in East and Central Africa, 1900-1914. History of Science. 32. 89-102