Writing business research article abstractsA genre approach

  1. Piqué Noguera, Carmen
Revista:
Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE )

ISSN: 1139-7241

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 24

Páginas: 211-232

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE )

Resumen

A great deal has been published about oral and written genres in business (e.g., letters, research articles, oral presentations, etc.), and less attention has been paid to business research article abstracts as a written genre, as many experts would argue. This research intends to raise rhetorical awareness about the role of abstracts in today�s academic world. To this effect, the abstracts of two official publications of the Association of Business Communication, Journal of Business Communication and Business Communication Quarterly, have been analyzed and compared in terms of structure and content according to models published in the specialized literature. The results show an irregular and inconsistent presentation of abstracts, a good number of them following no set pattern and thus lacking in important information for researchers. These findings suggest, first of all, that abstracts have a specific mission to fulfil and should not be disregarded; and, secondly, that journal guidelines for authors should be more explicit in their instructions on how to write and structure abstracts.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature (1987). “A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles”. Annals of Internal Medicine 106: 598-604.
  • Amidon, S. (2008). “The learning history: analyzing an emerging genre”. Journal of Business Communication 45: 451-482.
  • Andrews, D.C. & B. Henze (2009). “Teaching professional writing to American students in a study abroad program”. Business Communication Quarterly 72: 5-20.
  • ANSI/NISO (1997). “Guidelines for abstracts. Revision of ANSI Z39.14-1979 (R1987)”. Bethesda, MD: American National Standards Institute, NISO Press.
  • APA Publication Manual (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
  • Baxter, C. & T.D. Clark (1982). “My favorite assignment”. Business Communication Quarterly 45: 38-41.
  • Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Berkenkotter, C. & T. Huckin (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
  • Borko, H. & S. Chatman (1963). “Criteria for acceptable abstracts: a survey of abstracters’ instructions”. American Documentation 14: 149-160.
  • Cremmins, E.T. (1982). The Art of Abstracting. Philadelphia: ISI Press.
  • Dronberger, G.B. & G.T. Kowitz (1975). “Abstract readability as a factor in information systems”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 26: 108-111.
  • Gillaerts, P. & F. Van de Velde (2010). “Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 128-139.
  • Hartley, J. (1997). “Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals?” Learned Publishing 10: 313-317.
  • Hartley, J. (2003). “Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: the case for structure”. Science Communication 24: 366-379.
  • Hartley, J. & M. Benjamin (1998). “An evaluation of structured abstracts in journals published by the British Psychological Society”. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 443-456.
  • Hartley, J. & L. Betts (2009). “Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 2010- 2018.
  • Hernon, P. & C. Schwartz (2010). “Writing an abstract”. Library & Information Science Research 32: 173.
  • Huth, E.J. (1987). “Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials”. Annals of Internal Medicine 106: 626-627 . Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow, Essex: Longman/Pearson Education.
  • Hyland, K. (2001). “Bringing in the reader: addressee features in academic articles”. Written Communication 18: 549-574.
  • Kellner, R.S. (1982). “The degeneration of technical writing: a question of teacher competency”. Business Communication Quarterly 45: 5-10.
  • Kitchenham, B.A., O.P. Brereton, S. Own, J. Butcher & C. Jefferies (2008). “Length and readability of structured software engineering abstracts”. IEP Software 2: 37-45.
  • Kreth, M.L. (2005). “A small-scale client project for business writing students”. Business Communication Quarterly 68: 52-59.
  • Lammers, J.C. (2011). “How institutions communicate: institutional messages, institutional logics, and organizational communication”. Management Communication Quarterly 25: 154- 182.
  • Lancaster, F.W. (1991). Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. London: Library Association Publishing Press.
  • Lischinsky, A. (2008). “Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature”. Discourse & Communication 2: 243-269.
  • Lorés, R. (2004). “On RA abstracts: form rhetorical structure to thematic organization”. English for Specific Purposes 23: 280-302.
  • MacDonald, S.P. (1990). “The literary argument and its discursive conventions” in W. Nash (ed.), The Writing Scholar. Studies in Academic Discourse, 31-62. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Orasan, C. (2001). “Patterns in scientific abstracts” in Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference, 433-443. Lancaster: Lancaster University. URL: http://clg.wlv.ac.uk/papers/ orasan-01b.pdf [04/04/11]
  • Perales-Escudero, M. & J.M. Swales (2011). “Trading convergence and divergence in pairs of Spanish and English research article abstracts: the case of Ibérica”. Ibérica 21: 49-70.
  • Piqué-Angordans, J. & C. Piqué-Noguera (2010). “English for academic research” in R. Giménez Moreno (ed.), Words for Working. Professional and Academic English for International Business and Economics, 335-373. València: Publicacions de la Universitat de València.
  • Roundy, N. (1982). “A process approach to teaching abstracts”. Business Communication Quarterly 45: 34-38.
  • Russell, D.R. (2007). “Rethinking the articulation between business and technical communication and writing in the disciplines. Useful avenues for teaching and research”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 21: 249-277.
  • Samraj, B. (2005). “An exploration of a genre sent: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes 24: 141- 156.
  • Scott, M. (2009). WordSmith Tools, version 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Seifert, C. (2009). “Writing for business: a graduate-level course in problem-solving”. Business Communication Quarterly 72: 200-213.
  • Staiger, D. L. (1966). “What today’s students need to know about writing abstracts”. Journal of Business Communication 3: 29-33.
  • Swales, J. M. (1984). “Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application to the teaching of academic writing” in R. Williams, J. Swales & J. Kirkman (eds.), Common Ground: Shared Interests in ESP and Communication Studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swales, J.M. (2004). Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swales, J.M. & C.B. Feak (2009). Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Swales, J.M. & C.B. Feak (2010). “From text to task: putting research on abstracts to work” in M.F. Ruiz-Garrido, J.C. Palmer-Silveira & I. Fortanet- Gómez (eds.), English for Professional and Academic Purposes, 167-180. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
  • Swales, J.M., V. Irwin & C.B. Feak (2009). “Online commentary for Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts”. URL: http://www.press.umich.edu/esl/ compsite/ETRW/9780472033355-commentary.pdf [05/04/11]
  • Thomas, J. (1999). “Business writing in history: What caused the dictamen’s demise”. The Journal of Business Communication 36: 40-54.
  • Ufnalska, S. & J. Hartley (2009). “How can we evaluate the quality of abstracts?” European Science Editing 35: 69-71.
  • Weissberg, R. & S. Buker (1990). Writing up Research. Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet