Evaluación del impacto de los subsidios públicos en el funcionamiento de una empresauna aproximación cuasi-experimental en dos etapas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acs, Z. (2000): Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change, Pinter, London.
• Almus, M. and Czarnitzki, D. (2003): "The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany", Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21:226-236.
• Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H. and Lenz, S. (2002): "The effectiveness of government promotion of advanced manufacturing technologies (ATM): An economic analysis based on Swiss micro data", Small Business Economics, 19 (4): 321-340.
• Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1996): "Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle", Review of Industrial Organisation, 11: 253-273.
• Baldwin R. and Martin, P. (2006): "Coordination of industrial policy in the European Union". EIB Papers, 11 (1): 134-157.
• Becker, S.O. and Ichino, A. (2002): "The estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity score", The Stata Journal, 2 (4): 358-377.
• Blanes, J.V. and Busom, I. (2004): "Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms", Research Policy, 33 (10):1479-1476.
• Busom, I. (2000): "An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9 (2): 111-148.
• Callejón, M. and García-Quevedo, J. (2000): "Economía y política del cambio tecnológico en la industria de Cataluña", Economía Industrial, 335-336:193-206.
• Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (2005): Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
• Cooke, P., Boekholt, P. and Tödtling, F. (2000): The Governance of Innovation in Europe, Pinter, London.
• Czarnitzki, D. and Fier, A. (2002): "Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment? Evidence from the German service sector", Applied Economics Quarterly, 48 (1):1-25.
• David, P.A., Hall, B.H. and Toole, A.A. (2000): "Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence", Research Policy, 29 (4/5):1459-1476.
• Dehejia, R.H. and Wahba, S. (1999): "Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94 (448): 1053-1062.
• Dehejia, R.H. and Wahba, S. (2002): "Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies", Review of Economics and Statistics, 84 (1):151-161.
• Duguet, E. (2004): "Are R&D Subsidies a Substitute or a Complement to Privately Funded R&D? An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level", Revue d'Economie Politique, 114 (2):245-274.
• Feldman, M. and Audretsch, D. (1999): "Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition", European Economic Review, 43:409-429.
• Fernández, E., Junquera, B. and Vázquez, C. (1996): "The government support for R&D: The Spanish case", Technovation, 16 (2):59-65.
• Fornahl, D. and Brenner, T. (2003): Cooperation, Networks and Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Glos, UK.
• Fritsch, M. and Stephan, A. (2005): "Regionalization of innovation policy-Introduction to the special issue", Research Policy, 34 (8):1123-1127.
• Gallini, N. and Wright, B. (1990): "Technology transfer under asymmetric information", RAND Journal of Economics, 21 (1):147-160.
• García, J. and Afcha, S. (2009): "El impacto del apoyo público a la I+D empresarial: Un análisis comparativo entre las subvenciones estatales y regionales". Investigaciones Regionales, 15:277-294.
• Greene, W.H. (2003): Econometric Analysis, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddler River, New Jersey.
• Hall, B. (1993): "R&D tax policy during the eighties: success or failure?", Tax Policy and the Economy, 7:1-36.
• Hall, B.H. and van Reenen, J. (2000): "How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence", Research Policy, 29 (4/5):449-469.
• Heijs, J. (1999): "La difusión de los créditos del CDTI en el País Vasco y Navarra", Ekonomiaz-Revista Vasca de Economía, 44: 278-301.
• Heijs, J. (2001): Política tecnológica e innovación; evaluación de la financiación pública de I+D, Consejo Económico Social, Colección de Estudios. Madrid.
• Herrera, L. and Heijs, J. (2007): "Difusión y adicionalidad de las ayudas públicas a la innovación", Revista de Economía Aplicada, 15 (44):117-197.
• Herrera L. and M. Nieto (2008): "The national innovation policy effect according to firm location", Technovation, 28 (8):540-550.
• Klette, T.J., Moen, J. and Griliches, Z. (2000): "Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies", Research Policy, 29 (4/5):471-495.
• Lalonde, R.J. (1986): "Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data", American Economic Review, 76 (4):604-620.
• Lambrecht, J. and Pirnay, F. (2005): "An evaluation of public support measures for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Walloon Region of Belgium", Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17 (2):89-108.
• Lenihan, H. (1999): "An evaluation of a regional development agency's grants in terms of deadweight and displacement", Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17 (3):303-318.
• Lenihan, H. (2004): "Evaluating Irish industrial policy in terms of deadweight and displacement: a quantitative methodological approach", Applied Economics, 36 (3):229-252.
• Lenihan, H. and Hart, M. (2004): "The use of counterfactual scenarios as a means to assess policy deadweight: an Irish case study", Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22 (6):817-839.
• Lerner, J. (1999): "The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program", Journal of Business, 72 (3):285-318.
• Matutes, C., Regibeau, P. and Rockett, K. (1996): "Optimal patent design and the diffusion of innovations", RAND Journal of Economics, 27 (1):60-83.
• Mohnen, P. (2000): R&D tax incentives: issues and evidence. In: Neven, D and Roller, L. H. (Eds.), The political economy of industrial policy in Europe and the Member States (pp. 183-199). Sigma, Berlin.
• Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. (2008): Innovation policy, innovation in policy: policy learning within and across systems and clusters. In: Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. (Eds), Innovation Policy in Europe. Measurement and Strategy (pp. 225-269). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Glos, UK.
• Nordhaus, W. D. (1969): Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change, Cambridge, Mass.
• Paci, R. and Usai, S. (2000): "Technological enclaves and industrial districts: an analysis of the regional distribution of innovative activity in Europe", Regional Studies, 34 (2):97-114.
• Roper, S., Hewitt-Dundas, N. and Love, J.H. (2004): "An ex ante evaluation framework for the regional benefits of publicly supported R&D projects", Research Policy, 33 (3):487-509.
• Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D.B. (1983): "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects", Biometrica, 70 (1):41-55.
• Rubin, D.B. (1977) "Assignment to treatment group on the basis of covariate", Journal of Educational Statistics, 2 (1): 1-26.
• Smith, J.A. and Todd, P.E. (2005): "Does Matching Overcome LaLonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?", Journal of Econometrics, 125:305-353.
• Socorro, M. P. (2007): "Optimal technology policy under asymmetric information in a research joint venture", Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 62 (1):76-97.
• Storper, M. (1995): "The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies", European Urban and Regional Studies, 2 (3):191-221.
• Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005): "One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach", Research Policy, 34 (8):1203-1219.
• Turok, I. (1997): "Evaluating European support for business development: evidence from the structural funds in Scotland", Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9 (4): 335-352.
• Wallsten, S. (2000): "The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program", RAND Journal of Economics, 13 (1): 82-100.