Repercusión en la autoeficacia docente de los términos “dislexia” y “dificultad específica del aprendizaje en lectura

  1. R. Tárraga-Mínguez 1
  2. Pilar Sanz-Cervera 1
  3. Irene Lacruz-Pérez 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València, España
Revista:
Interdisciplinaria: Revista de psicología y ciencias afines = journal of psychology and related sciences

ISSN: 0325-8203,  1668-7027

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 39

Número: 3

Páginas: 263-274

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.16888/INTERD.2022.39.3.15 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Interdisciplinaria: Revista de psicología y ciencias afines = journal of psychology and related sciences

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The diagnostic labels of “dyslexia” and “reading learning disability” can be considered from a theoretical point of view as practically synonymous, according to the latest version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5; APA, 2013). However, the teachers’ choice of one term or another carries certain connotations that could have a significant influence on their perceptions. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the labels of dyslexia and reading learning disability influence the feeling of self-efficacy of a group of pre-service teachers. Self-efficacy beliefs refer to the judgment that a person makes about their own ability to perform a certain action or task successfully. According to previous research, the study of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs is relevant because they are directly related to the academic performance of students. Moreover, these beliefs are also related to teachers’ attitudes towards educational inclusion of students with specific needs of educational support, in which students with dyslexia or reading learning disability are included. In this study, a questionnaire of 14 Likert-type questions with 9 options was administered to 242 students of the Early Childhood and Primary Education Teachers degrees of the University of Valencia. These students had no previous knowledge on the subject that was treated in the questionnaire in the moment that they filled it out. The instrument was adapted from a questionnaire used in the study of Gibbs & Elliot (2015). These authors adapted it from the original one, Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy for Literacy Instruction Scale (TSELI), designed by Tschannen-Moran & Johnson (2011). The questions were about the beliefs that pre-service teachers had about their own effectiveness and ability in teaching students with dyslexia or reading learning disability. There were also some questions regarding participants’ demographic information. A group of pre-service teachers filled out a version of the questionnaire asking about dyslexia and another group filled out another version where the word “dyslexia” was replaced by the term “reading learning disability”. After collecting the data, a statistical analysis was carried out with two purposes. One of them was to know if the use of two different diagnostic labels influences the pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. The other one was to find out if there were statistically significant differences regarding gender and the different specializations that the pre-service teachers were studying (early childhood education or primary education). After data analysis, statistically significant differences were obtained, finding that the term “dyslexia” seemed to be perceived by pre-service teachers as a more difficult problem to face compared to the term “reading learning disability”. No differences were found between gender or specialty (early childhood/primary education). Therefore, the main finding of this study is that the use of certain diagnostic labels influences teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. More specifically, the interpretation of this result in this research is that pre-service teachers conceive the term “dyslexia” as a medical concept, what can be interpreted for students as a more difficult diagnostic to intervene and modify through education in comparison with the term “reading learning disability”. This fact indicates that during initial teacher training, the understanding of the terms “dyslexia” and “reading learning disability” should be studied in greater depth. Additionally, this paper can contribute to show the importance of the decision made by professionals regarding the exact term they use when preparing the psychological reports of the students with special educational needs. These findings do not exactly agree with the results obtained in previous studies on this topic, and this is discussed in the discussion section. Moreover, we also indicate the limitations of the study and future lines of research.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Brownell, M. T., Ross, D. D., Colón, E. P. y Mccallum, C. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. The Journal of Special Education, 38(4), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050380040601
  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P. y Malone, P, S. (2006). Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs as Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Students’ Academic Achievement: A Study at the School Level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
  • Elliott, J. G. y Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). The dyslexia debate. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ferroni, M. V., Barreyro, J. P., Mena, M. y Diuk, B. G. (2019). Perfiles cognitivos de niños de nivel socioeconómico bajo con dificultades en la velocidad lectora: análisis de los resultados de una intervención. Interdisciplinaria, 36(1), 273-288. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.36.1.18
  • Gibbs, S., Beckmann, J. F., Elliott, J., Metsäpelto, R. L., Vehkakoski, T. y Aro, M. (2020). What’s in a name: the effect of category labels on teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1652441
  • Gibbs, S. y Elliot, J. (2015). The differential effects of labelling: how do ‘dyslexia’and ‘reading difficulties’ affect teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(3), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1022999
  • Hornstra, L., Denessen, E., Bakker, J., Van Den Bergh, L. y Voeten, M. (2010). Teacher attitudes toward dyslexia: Effects on teacher expectations and the academic achievement of students with dyslexia. Journal of learning disabilities, 43(6), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355479
  • Kite, D. M., Gullifer, J. y Tyson, G. A. (2013). Views on the diagnostic labels of autism and Asperger’s disorder and the proposed changes in the DSM. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(7), 1692-1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1718-2
  • Kudo, M. F., Lussier, C. M. y Swanson, H. L. (2015). Reading disabilities in children: A selective meta-analysis of the cognitive literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.002
  • Lee, K. W., Cheung, R. Y. M. y Chen, M. (2019). Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in managing students with symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: The roles of diagnostic label and students’ gender. Psychology in the Schools, 56, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22221
  • León, M. J. (2011). La situación de la formación en educación inclusiva en los nuevos títulos de grado de maestro en España. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 70, 145-164. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/25092
  • Leyser, Y., Zeiger, T. y Romi, S. (2011). Changes in self-efficacy of prospective special and general education teachers: Implication for inclusive education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 58(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2011.598397
  • Lindeblad, E., Svensson, I. y Gustafson, S. (2016). Self-concepts and psychological well-being assessed by Beck Youth Inventory among pupils with reading difficulties. Reading Psychology, 37(3), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1060092
  • Lopes, J. (2012). Biologising reading problems: the specific case of dyslexia. Contemporary Social Science, 7(2), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2012.692098
  • Maisog, J. M., Einbinder, E. R., Flowers, D. L., Turkeltaub, P. E. y Eden, G. F. (2008). A meta‐analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145(1), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1416.024
  • Malathesa, R., Washburn, E. K. y Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on teacher knowledge from an international perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0119-6
  • Malinen, O. P., Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Xu, J., Nel, M., Nel, N. y Tlale, D. (2013). Exploring teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices in three diverse countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.004
  • Nah, Y. H. y Tan, J. W. L. (2021). The effect of diagnostic labels on teachers' perceptions of behaviours of students with autism spectrum disorder. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12368
  • Sánchez-Acero, A. y García-Martín, M. B. (2021). Programa de entrenamiento en potencial de aprendizaje para niños colombianos con dificultades de aprendizaje en Matemáticas. Interdisciplinaria, 38(1), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2021.38.1.11
  • Sanz, P., Fernández, M. I., Pastor, G. y Tárraga, R. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge, misconceptions and gaps about autism spectrum disorder. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(3), 212-224. https://doi.org /10.1177/0888406417700963
  • Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M. y Malinen, O. P. (2012). Understanding teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy in inclusive education: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.613603
  • Soriano-Ferrer, M., Echegaray-Bengoa, J. y Malathesa, R. (2016). Knowledge and beliefs about developmental dyslexia in pre-service and in-service Spanish-speaking teachers. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(1), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0111-1
  • Taylor, L. M., Hume, I. R. y Welsh, N. (2010). Labelling and self‐esteem: the impact of using specific vs. generic labels. Educational Psychology, 30(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903494478
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. y Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education 27(4), 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.005
  • Vlachou, A., Eleftheriadou, D. y Metallidou, P. (2014). Do learning difficulties differentiate elementary teachers’ attributional patterns for students’ academic failure? A comparison between Greek regular and special education teachers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.830440
  • Washburn, E. K., Binks‐Cantrell, E. S. y Malathesa, R. (2014). What do preservice teachers from the USA and the UK know about dyslexia? Dyslexia, 20(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1459
  • Woodcock, S. y Hitches, E. (2017). Potential or problem? An investigation of secondary school teachers’ attributions of the educational outcomes of students with specific learning difficulties. Annals of dyslexia, 67(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0145-7
  • Zee, M. y Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet