Validación psicométrica de la batería UNIPSICO en valenciano/catalánanálisis de las escalas que evalúan las variables psicosociales de demanda

  1. Llorca-Rubio, José Luis 1
  2. Llorca-Pellicer, Marta 1
  3. Gil-Monte, Pedro R. 1
  4. Gil-LaOrden, Pedro 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Revue:
Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales

ISSN: 1138-9672,  1578-2549

Année de publication: 2022

Volumen: 25

Número: 3

Pages: 285-299

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12961/APRL.2022.25.03.05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales

Résumé

Aim: To analyse the psychometric properties of the demand scales of the UNIPSICO questionnaire in in Valencian / Catalan language. Method: The sample consisted of 2114 participants from public administration centres of Generalitat Valenciana in Valencia. Data were collected using the UNIPSICO questionnaire, which is grouped into six scales that measure psychosocial risk factors related to job demands (33 items): role conflict (5 items), role ambiguity (5 items), workload (6 items), interpersonal conflicts (6 items), inequity in social exchanges (5 items), and work-family and family-work conflict (6 items). We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and measured Cronbach alpha and McDonald omega coefficients for the scales. Results: All items had adequate statistical and psychometric values. The six-factor model that reproduces the original structure of the questionnaire presented an adequate fit to the data, and gender invariance. The Cronbach alpha and McDonald omega coefficients were acceptable for the six scales of the instrument. Conclusions: These results contribute to the psychometric validation of the questionnaire and allow us to conclude that the demand scales of the UNIPSICO questionnaire translated to Valencian / Catalan language are reliable and possess construct validity for the assessment of psychosocial risk factors in government employees.

Références bibliographiques

  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(3):309-28.
  • Karasek RA, Theorell T. Healthy work. Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books; 1990.
  • Gilboa S, Shirom A, Fried Y, Cooper CA. Meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psychology. 2008;61(2):227-71.
  • Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health. 1988;78(10):1336-42.
  • Karasek, RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979;24(2):285-308.
  • Gil-Monte PR. Manual de psicosociología aplicada al trabajo y a la prevención de riesgos laborales. Madrid. Ed. Pirámide; 2014.
  • Gil-Monte PR. La Batería UNIPSICO: propiedades psicométricas de las escalas que evalúan los factores psicosociales de demanda. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2016;19(2):86-94.
  • Gil-Monte PR La Batería UNIPSICO: propiedades psicométricas de las escalas que evalúan los factores psicosociales de recursos. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2016;19(2):95-102.
  • Llorca-Rubio JL, Gil-Monte PR, Llorca-Pellicer M, Gil-LaOrden P. Validación psicométrica de la batería UNIPSICO en valenciano/catalán: análisis de las escalas que evalúan las variables psicosociales de recursos. Anuario de Psicología. 2021; 51(3): 130-8.
  • Gil-Monte PR, López-Vílchez J, Llorca-Rubio, JL, Sánchez J. Prevalencia de riesgos psicosociales en personal de la administración de justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (España). Liber. 2016;22(1):7-19.
  • Moncada S, Llorens C, Kristensen TS, Vega S. El método COPSOQ (ISTAS21, PSQCAT21) de evaluación de riesgos psicosociales. NTP 703 del INSHT. Madrid: INSHT; 2006.
  • Pérez J, Nogareda C. Factores psicosociales: metodología de evaluación. NTP 926 del INSHT. Madrid: INSHT; 2012.
  • World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA; 2013.
  • Miles J, Shevlin M. Applying regression & correlation. A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage; 2005.
  • Kline M. Mathematics: The loss of certainty (Vol. 686). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982.
  • Bentler PM. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112(3):400–4.
  • Hoyle RH. The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage Publications, Inc.; 1995.
  • Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008.
  • Hair JH, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. Cuarta edición. Englewood Cliffs(NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1995.
  • Dimitrov DM. Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2010;43(2):121-49.
  • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. 2002;9(2):233-55.
  • Vargas CS, Barrientos AS. Análisis confirmatorio y coeficiente Omega como propiedades psicométricas del instrumento Clima Laboral de Sonia Palma. Revista de Investigación en Psicología. 2017;20(2):377-88.
  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. New York: Pearson Education Inc; 2007.
  • Elosua P. Evaluación progresiva de la invarianza factorial entre las versiones original y adaptada de una escala de autoconcepto. Psicothema. 2005;17(2):356-62.
  • Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  • McDonald R. El coeficiente omega. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 1999;50(4):150-5.
  • Salgado JF. Personalidad y deseabilidad social en contextos organizacionales: implicaciones para la práctica de la psicología del trabajo y las organizaciones. Papeles del Psicólogo. 2005;26(92):115-28.
La source de données: Dialnet