Delimitando conceptos jurídicos, también, en el plano internacionalel artículo XXI GATT como paradigma

Références bibliographiques

• Akande, D. y Williams, S.: “International Adjudication on National Security Issues: What Role for the WTO?”, Virginia Journal of International Law, 2003-2004, vol. 43, pp. 366–367
• Alford, R.P.: “The Self-Judging WTO Security Exception”, Utah Law Review, 2011, vol. 3, p. 750
• Bauman, Z.: Modernidad líquida, FCE, México, 2002
• Bhala, R.: “National Security and International Trade Law: What the GATT Says, and What the United States Does”, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 1989, vol. 19, p. 268
• Bianca, C.M.: Realtà sociale ed effettivita della norma: scritti giuridici, Giuffre, Milan, 2002, 2 vols
• Bjorklund, A.K.: “Emergency Exceptions”, en AA.VV.: The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (ed. por Muchlinski, P.T., Ortino, F. y Schreuer, C.), Oxford, OUP, 2008, p. 476
• Browne, R.E.: “Revising “National Security” in an Interdependent World: The GATT Article XXI Defense after Helms–Burton”, The Georgetown Law Journal, 1997, vol. 86, p. 411
• Burke-White, W. y Von Staden, A.: “Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Virginia Journal of International Law, 2008, vol. 48, n°. 2, p. 320
• Cann, W. jr.: “Creating Standards and Accountability for the Use of the WTO Security Exception: Reducing the Role of Power-Based Relations and Establishing a New Balance between Sovereignty and Multilateralism”, Yale Journal of International Law, 2001, vol. 26, p. 415
• Cottier, T. y Delimatsis, P.: “Article XIVbis GATS: Security Exceptions”, en AA.VV.: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, WTO – Trade in Services (ed. por Wolfrum, R., Stoll, P.T. y Feinäugle, C.), Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston, 2008, vol. 6, p. 6
• Dattu, R. y Boscariol, J.: “GATT Article XXI, Helms–Burton and the Continuing Abuse of the National Security Exception”, Canadian Business Law Journal, 1997, vol. 28, p. 204
• Emmerson, A.: “Conceptualizing Security Exceptions: Legal Doctrine or Political Excuse?”, Journal of International Economic Law, 2008, vol. 11, p. 136
• Esplugues, C.: Foreign Investment, National Security and Strategic Assets, Cambridge, intersentia, 2018
• Esplugues Mota, C.: El control de las inversiones extranjeras directas, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, 2018
• Esplugues Mota, C.: “La creciente interacción entre la seguridad nacional y el comercio internacional: hacia una concreción del significado y alcance del artículo XXI GATT en tiempos de cambios tecnológicos y competencia geopolítica”, CdT, 2020, vol. 12, nº. 1, p. 170.
• Federer, H.: “GATT Article XXI: Trade Sanctions and the Need to Clarify the Security Exceptions”, Cambridge Law Review, vol. 3, 2018, p. 220
• Goodman, R.: “Norms and National Security: The WTO as a Catalyst for Inquiry”, Chicago Journal of International Law, 2001, vol. 2, n°. 1, p. 104
• Hahn, M.J.: “Vital Interests and the Law of GATT: An Analysis of GATT’s Security Exception”, Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 12, 1990-1991, p. 583
• Kurtz, J.: “Adjudging the Exceptional at International Investment Law, Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2010, vol. 59, p. 326
• Kurtz, J.: The WTO and International Investment Law Converging Systems, Cambridge, CUP, 2016
• Lee, J.: “Commercializing National Security: National Security Exceptions’ Outer Parameter under GATT Article XXI”, Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L & Pol’y, 2018, vol. 13, p. 289
• Lester, S.L. y Zhu, H.: “A Proposal for Rebalancing to Deal with National Security Trade Restrictions”, Fordham Int’l L.J., 2019, vol. 42, nº. 5, p. 1452
• Lindsay, P.: “The Ambiguity of GATT Article XXI: Subtle Success or Rampant Failure?”, Duke Law Journal, 2002-2003, vol. 52, p. 1297
• Moon, W.J.: “Essential Security Interests in International Investment Agreements”, Journal of International Economic Law, 2012, vol. 15, n°. 2, p. 492
• Nagy, C.I.: “World Trade, Imperial Fantasies and Protectionism: Can You Really Have Your Cake and Eat It Too”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2019, vol. 26, nº. 1, p. 102
• Nasu, H.: “The Expanded Conception of Security and International Law: Challenges to the UN Collective Security System”, Amsterdam Law Forum, 2011, vol. 3, n°. 3, p. 15
• Nolan, M.D. y Sourgens, F.G.: “The Limits of Discretion? Self-Judging Emergency Clauses in International Investment Agreements”, Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy, 2001, vol. 1, p. 395
• Orakhelashvili, A.: “Threat, Emergency and Survival: The Legality of Emergency Action in International Law”, Chinese Journal of International Law, 2010, p. 353
• Peng, S.Y.: “Cybersecurity Threats and the WTO National Security Exceptions”, Journal of International Economic Law, 2015, vol. 18, nº 2, p. 460
• Pérez, A.S.: “WTO and U.N. Law: Institutional Comity in National Security”, Yale Journal of International Law, 1998, vol. 23, p. 328
• Rose-Ackerman, S. y Billa, B.: “Treaties and National Security”, International Law and Politics, 2008, vol. 40, p. 443
• Schill, S.W. y Briese, R., ‘“If the State Considers”: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement”, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 2009, vol. 13, p. 67
• Schloemann, H.L. y Ohlhoff, S.: ‘“Constitutionalization” and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence”, American Journal of International Law, 1993, vol. 93, p. 100
• Shapiro, D.T.: “Be Careful What You Wish for: U.S. Politics and the Future of the National Security Exception to the GATT”, George Washington Journal of International Law & Economy, 1997, vol. 31, p. 111
• Sornarajah, M.: Resistance and Change in the International Law of Foreign Investment, CUP, Cambridge, 2015
• Voon, T.: “The Security Exception in WTO Law: Entering a New Era”, AJIL Unbound, 2019, vol. 113, p. 46
• Waldron, J.: “Safety and Security”, en AA.VV.: Civil Liberties, National Security and Prospects for Consensus. Legal, Philosophical and Religious Perspectives (ed. por reed, e. y dumper, m.), Cambridge, CUP, 2012, p. 14
• Weber, R.H. y Baisch, R.: “Revisiting the Public Moral/Order and the Security Exception under the GATS”, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 2018, vol. 13, n°. 2, p. 376
• Wolfers, A.: ““National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol”, Political Science Quarterly, 1952, vol. 67, n°. 4, p. 481
• Yannaca-Small, K.: “Essential Security Interests under International Investment Law”, en AA.VV.: International Investment Perspectives: Freedom of Investment in a Changing World, Paris, OECD, 2007, p. 99