The evaluation of status in Boris Johnson’s political speechesFrom foreign secretary to prime minister

  1. Rosana Dolón
Aldizkaria:
Revista española de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 0213-2028

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Alea: 35

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 332-359

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista española de lingüística aplicada

Laburpena

This study compares two seminal speeches given by Boris Johnson in the context of Brexit. The first is from 2018 during his tenure as Foreign Secretary, and the second from 2020, by which time he had become Prime Minister. The transcripts of the two complete speeches together constitute a corpus of 7,270 words. The current study applies Hunston’s (2000, 2008, 2011) model of evaluation as a means of testing Johnson’s attitude towards the propositions he develops through his political oratory. Using the concepts of evaluation of status and value, this model allows us to identify Johnson’s degree of alignment with his representation of the world, and to perceive an ideological component in his choices here. It is hypothesized that the changes which took place in the political landscape in the time that separated the two speeches, a period of two years in which Johnson became Prime Minister and Britain left the European Union, may have had an effect on his use of evaluative language. The study reveals statistically significant findings. Johnson is found to have changed from contributing primarily world-creating propositional content in his 2018 speech to a more significant use of world-reflecting statements in his 2020 speech, and to rely in both speeches most importantly on himself as the source of information. The study also reveals a reluctance to display any hypothetical speech behaviour, and a strong preference for truth driven statements.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aloy-Mayo, M. & Taboada, M. (2017) Evaluation in political discourse addressed to women: Appraisal analysis of Cosmopolitan’s online coverage of the 2014 midterm elections. Discourse, Context and Media, 18, 40–48. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.003
  • Ananko, T. (2017) The category of evaluation in political discourse. Advanced Education, 8, 128–137. 10.20535/2410‑8286.108550 https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.108550
  • Biber, D. & Finegan, E.(1989) Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124.
  • Billig, M. (1995) Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
  • Bloor, M. & Bloor, T. (2018) Systemic functional linguistics. InJ. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse analysis (pp.151–164). New York: Routledge.
  • Budd, K. (2015) Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Critical Discourse Analysis, 13(1), 139–141. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1105420 https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1105420
  • Cabrejas-Peñuelas, A. B. & Díez-Prados, M. (2014) Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates. Discourse and Society, 25(2), 159–185. 10.1177/0957926513515601 https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513515601
  • Cabrejas-Peñuelas, A. B. & Dolón, R. (2021) Evaluation in Theresa May’s political discourse: A study of the PM’s seminal Brexit speeches. InM. Fuster-Márquez, J. Santaemilia, C. Gregori-Signes & P. Rodríguez-Abruñeiras (Eds.), Exploring discourse and ideology through corpora (pp.95–118). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Catalano, T. (2011) Barack Obama: A semiotic analysis of his Philadelphia speech. Political Discourse Analysis, 3(1), 47–74.
  • Chafe, W. (1986) Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. InW. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp.261–272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Charteris-Black, J. (2013) Analysing political speeches. Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Chilton, P. & Schäffner, Ch. (Eds) (2002) Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4 https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4
  • Díez-Prados, M. & Cabrejas-Peñuelas, A. B. (2018) Evaluation of “status” as a persuasive tool in Spanish and American pre-electoral debates in times of crisis. Atlantis, 40(2), 169–195. 10.28914/Atlantis‑2018‑40.2.09 https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2018-40.2.09
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007) Research methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. & Fairclough, I. (2012) Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
  • Finlayson, A. & Martin, J. (2008) ‘It ain’t what you say …’: British political studies and the analysis of speech and rhetoric. Journal of British politics, 3, 445–64. 10.1057/bp.2008.21 https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2008.21
  • Gray, B. & Biber, D. (2012) Current conceptions of stance. InK. Hyland (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp.15–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137030825_2 https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_2
  • Halliday, M. A. & Matthiessen, Ch. M. (2004) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Harmon, L. (2017) Political discourse as practical reasoning: A case study of a British Prime Minister candidate speech. Linguistics Beyond and Within, 3, 74–86. 10.31743/lingbaw.5651 https://doi.org/10.31743/lingbaw.5651
  • Hillier, H. (2004) Analysing real texts: Research studies in modern English language. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑05005‑2 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05005-2
  • Hunston, S. (2000) Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. InS. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial status and the construction of discourse (pp.176–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hunston, S. (2008) The evaluation of status in multi-modal texts. Functions of Language15(1), 64–83. 10.1075/fol.15.1.05hun https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15.1.05hun
  • Hunston, S. (2011) Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York: Routledge.
  • Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (Eds) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. 10.1177/1461445605050365 https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
  • Lemke, J. L. (1998) Resources of attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientation in text semantics. Functions of Language5(1), 33–56. 10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem
  • Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
  • O’Donnell, M. (2012) UAM Corpus Tool: Annotation for the 21st Century, atwww.corpustool.com/index.html
  • Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (1989) Language has a heart. Text, 9(1), 7–25.
  • Pinna, A. (2007) Evaluation and ideology in political discourse: The use of extended units of meaning centred on modal verbs in G.W. Bush’s presidential speeches. InG. Garzone & S. Sarangi (Eds.), Discourse, ideology and specialized communication (pp.433–452). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Polonska-Kimunguyi, E. & Kimunguyi, P. (2018) ‘Gunboats of soft power’: Boris on Africa and post-Brexit ‘global Britain’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1432565
  • Ponton, D. M. (2011) For argument’s sake: Speaker evaluation in modern political discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Portner, P. (2009) Modality. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Rawlison, K. (2018) Brexit speech: Boris Johnson refuses to rule out resignation, athttps://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2018/feb/14/boris-johnson-brexit-speech-referendum-politics-live?page=with:block-5a83de8de4b074a20729abd6
  • Savoy, J. (2010) Lexical analysis of US political speeches. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), 123–141. 10.1080/09296171003643205 https://doi.org/10.1080/09296171003643205
  • Schaffner, Ch. (1996) Political speeches and discourse analysis. Current Issues in Language and Society, 3(3), 201–204.
  • Shayegh, K. (2012) Modality in political discourses of Barak Obama and Martin Luther King. Trends in Advanced Science and Engineering, 3(1), 2–8.
  • Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2008) Hillary Clinton vs. Barack Obama: A linguistic study of Appraisal in political speeches. Master’s thesis, University of Ghent.
  • Smith, N. (2020) Boris Johnson says ‘no need’ for UK to follow EU rules of trade, athttps://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51351914
  • Svensson, L. (2018) The European project: A comparative critical discourse analysis of three State of the Union speeches. PhD thesis, Lundt Universitet.
  • Swain, E. (2012) Analysing evaluation in political cartoons. Discourse, Context & Media, 1, 82–94. 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.09.002
  • The Guardian Editorial (2018) The Guardian’s view of Boris Johnson’s Brexit vision: All about me, athttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/14/the-guardian-view-of-boris-johnsons-brexit-vision-all-about-me
  • Thompson, G. & Hunston, S. (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. InS. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp.1–27). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1995) Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243–289. 10.1177/0957926595006002006 https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2002) Political discourse and political cognition. InP. Chilton & Ch. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp.203–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2006) Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. 10.1080/13569310600687908 https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
  • White, P. R. (2003) Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259–284.
  • Wodak, R. (Ed) (1989) Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Company. 10.1075/ct.7 https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7
Datuen iturria: Dialnet