The dual process model of moral judgementA divided mind or a myopic methodology?

Références bibliographiques

• Aristóteles, Ética a Nicómaco, (Gredos, Madrid, 2000) 111a 20.
• Berker, S., «The normative insignificance of neuroscience», Philosophy and Public Affairs 37/4, (2009), pp. 293-329.
• Clarke, S., «SIM and the City: Rationalism in Psychology and Philosophy and Haidt’s Account of Moral Judgment», Philosophical Psychology 21/6 (2008) 805.
• Cortina, A., ¿Para qué sirve realmente la ética? (Paidós, Barcelona, 2013), p. 122.
• Cortina, A., «Neuroética: ¿Las bases cerebrales de una ética universal con relevancia política?» Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 42 (2010) 144
• Cortina, A., Ética de la razón cordial. (Nobel, Oviedo, 2007) 192
• Cortina, A., Neuroética y neuropolítica (Tecnos, Madrid, 2011), p. 47.
• Cortina, A., Neuroética: presente y futuro, in cortina, a. (ed.). Guía Comares de neurofilosofía práctica. (Granada: Comares, 2012), p. 20.
• Cushman, f. And greene, J., «Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure», Social Neuroscience, 7/3 (2012) 270 and greene, J., Moral tribes, cit., p. 217.
• Dean, R., «Does neuroscience undermine deontological theory?», Neuroethics 3/1 (2010) 43-60
• Edmonds, D. E., Would you kill the fat man? (Princeton University Press, Princeton,2014).
• Gazzaniga, M. S. And ledoux, J. E., The integrated mind. (Plenum, New York, 1978)
• Gracia, D., «La deliberación moral. El papel de las metodologías en la ética clínica», in feito, L., gracia, d. And sánchez, m. (eds.). Bioética: el estado de la cuestión. (Tricastela, Madrid, 2000), pp. 101-153.
• Gracia, J., «¿Conduce la neurociencia a una naturalización del deontologismo? “Juicios morales deontológicos” en perspectiva neuroética», Pensamiento 73/276, (2017), pp. 581-586.
• Gracia, J., «¿Incurre la teoría del proceso dual del juicio moral de Joshua Greene en falacia naturalista?», Pensamiento 72/273, (2016), pp. 809-826.
• Greene, j. And haidt, J., «How (and where) does moral judgment work?», Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6/12 (2002) 519
• Greene, J., An fmri «Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment», Science 293 (2001) 1206
• Greene, J., Moral tribes. Emotion, reason and the gap between us and them (London, Atlantic Books, 2013), p. 334.
• Greene, J., nystrom, L. E., engell, A. D. And Cohen, j., «The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment», Neuron 44/2 (2014), p. 389.
• Greene, J., sommerville, R. B., nystrom, L. E., darley, J. M. And Cohen, J. D., «An fmri Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment», cit., pp. 2.106.
• Greene,J., nystrom, L. E., engell, A.D. and Cohen, J., «The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control Immoral Judgment», cit., 398
• Guy Kahane «Intuitive and counterintuitive morality», in Justin d’arms and Daniel jacobson (eds.) Moral psychology and Human Agency: Philosophical Essays on the Science of Ethics. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014), pp. 9-39.
• Haidt, j. And bjorklund, F., «Social Intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology», in W. Sinnott-armstrong (ed.) Moral Psychology, vol.2, (The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2007), p. 186.
• Haidt, J., «The emotional dog and its rational tail. A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement», Psychological Review, 108 (2001), p. 815.
• Haidt, J., hollert, S. H. And dias, M., «Affect, culture and morality, or is it wrong to eat our dog?», Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65/4 (1993), pp. 613-628.
• Helion, C. And pizarro, D. A., «Beyond Dual-Process: The interplay of Reason and Emotion in Moral Judgment», in clausen, j. And levi, n. (eds.) Handbook of Neuroethics (Springer, Oxford, 2015) cit., p. 113.
• J. Greene, «The secret joke of Kant’s soul», in armstrong, W. S. (ed.) Moral Psychology, (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008) 36
• Kunda, Z., «The case for motivated reasoning», Psychological Bulletin, 108, (1990), p. 482.
• Margolis, H., Patterns, thinking and cognition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987).
• Monin, B., pizarro, D. A. And beer, J. S., «Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of Moral» «Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate», Review of General Psychology 11/2 (2007) 99-111
• Monin, B., pizarro, D. A. And beer, J. S., «Reason and emotion in moral judgment: different prototypes lead to different theories», in K. Vohs, D. (ed.). Do emotions help or hurt decision making: a hedgefoxian perspective. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2007), pp. 219-244.
• Narvaez, D., «Moral complexity: The Fatal Attraction Truthiness and the Importance of Mature Moral Functioning», Perspectives on Psychological Science 5/2 (2010) 163-181
• Pallarés domínguez, D. V., «Críticas y orientaciones para el estudio en neuroéica», Recerca. Revista de pensament i anàlisi 13 (2013), p. 98.
• Pava, M. L., «The exaggerated moral claims of evolutionary psychologists», Journal of Business Ethics, 85/3(2009) 391-401.
• Pizarro, D. A. And bloom, P., «The intelligence of moral intuitions: Comment on Haidt (2001)», Psychological Review, 110/1(2003), p. 194.
• Saltzstein, H. D., and kasachkoff, T., «Haidt’s moral intuitionist theory: A psychological and philosophical critique», General Review of Psychology 8/4 (2004), p. 276.
• V. Tiberious, Moral psychology. A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge, New York, 2015), p. 194.
• Wilson, T. D., Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2002).