¡Viva la competencia!nuevas dimensiones para la búsqueda y evaluación de la información científica

  1. Enrique Orduña-Malea
  2. Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar
Journal:
Anuario ThinkEPI

ISSN: 1886-6344

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 12

Volume: 1

Pages: 304-310

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Anuario ThinkEPI

Abstract

After an overview of the changes that are taking place in the world of bibliographic databases used for scientific search and evaluation, this work describes the free version of Dimensions (bibliographic database produced by Digital Science and launched in January 2018). As a first step, a sketch is made of its main characteristics, operations, and features. We conclude that Dimensions is an interesting alternative for the search of scientific information, as well as for the analysis of citations, because it is able to compete with both Scopus (greater coverage and also free of charge) and Google scholar (greater functionalities for the treatment and export of data). Therefore, it is a hybrid product halfway between the classic bibliographic databases and the modern academic search engines.

Bibliographic References

  • Bode, Christian; Herzog, Christian; Hook, Daniel; McGrath, Robert (2018). A guide to the dimensions data approach. Digital science. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5783094
  • Harzing, Anne-Wil (2016). “Microsoft Academic (Search): A Phoenix arisen from the ashes?”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 3, pp. 1637-1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2026-y
  • Harzing, Anne-Wil; Alakangas, Satu (2017a). “Microsoft Academic is one year old: The Phoenix is ready to leave the nest”. Scientometrics, v. 112, n. 3, pp. 1887-1894. https://harzing.com/download/manest.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2454-3
  • Harzing, Anne-Wil; Alakangas, Satu (2017b). “Microsoft Academic: is the phoenix getting wings?”. Scientometrics, v. 110, n. 1, pp. 371-383. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/20937/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2185-x
  • Hook, Daniel (2017). “‘Who owns Digital Science’ – That is the Question…”. Digital Science. News blog, 8 noviembre. https://www.digital-science.com/blog/news/owns-digital-science-question
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (2012) (50th anniversary edition). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago press. ISBN: 978 0226458144
  • McShea, Jo (2018). “Dimensions – a Game-Changing product launch from Digital”. Outsell. https://figshare.com/s/68dcc69f3fe6189098bb
  • Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto; Ayllon, Juan M.; Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, Emilio (2014). “The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search”. Online information review, v. 38, n. 7, pp. 936-953. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2014-0169
  • Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto; Ayllón, Juan M.; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2016). La revolución Google Scholar: destapando la tapa de Pandora académica. Granada: UNE. ISBN: 978 84 338 5941 9
  • Schonfeld, Roger C. (2017). “Who owns Digital Science?”. The scholarly kitchen, 23 octubre. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/10/23/ownership-digital-science
  • Schonfeld, Roger C. (2018). “A new citation database launches today: Digital Science’s Dimensions”. The scholarly kitchen, 15 enero. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/01/15/new-citation-database-dimensions
  • Van-Noorden, Richard (2017). “Web of Science owner buys up booming peer-review platform”. Nature news. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.22094
Data source: Dialnet